The Efficacy of 2 Doses of Epidural Morphine for Postcesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND:A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we sought to establish whether half the traditional dose of epidural morphine, when administered as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen after...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anesthesia and analgesia Vol. 117; no. 3; pp. 677 - 685
Main Authors: Singh, Sudha I., Rehou, Sarah, Marmai, Kristine L., Jones, and Philip M.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States International Anesthesia Research Society 01-09-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract BACKGROUND:A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we sought to establish whether half the traditional dose of epidural morphine, when administered as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean delivery, was associated with noninferior analgesia and fewer adverse effects. METHODS:Ninety term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mg epidural morphine or, half this dose, 1.5 mg epidural morphine. In addition, subjects received regular systemic ketorolac and acetaminophen. Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone) was administered for breakthrough pain. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in total opioid consumption (measured in median IV morphine equivalents) within the first 24 hours. A prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg was used. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption from 24 to 48 hours, numerical rating scale pain scores, time to first request for analgesics, overall pain relief, maternal satisfaction, quality of recovery, and adverse effects. RESULTS:Data were analyzed for 87 participants. Noninferiority was demonstrated as the difference in median 24-hour opioid consumption between the 1.5 mg epidural morphine (EM) and 3 mg EM groups was 0 mg (1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 mg), which was less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg. No significant differences were found between groups in the median 24- to 48-hour opioid consumption or the median total opioid consumption within 48 hours. Pain scores, overall pain relief, and satisfaction at 24 and 48 hours were not significantly different between groups. The 1.5 mg EM group had a lower incidence of moderate and severe pruritus at 6 and 12 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.44, 95% CI, 0.2–0.9 and RR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.2–0.8, respectively) and had less nausea and vomiting at 6 hours (RR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05–0.9). There was no difference in average pain scores at 12 weeks between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION:When used as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen, 1.5 mg epidural morphine provided noninferior postcesarean analgesia and caused fewer adverse effects compared with 3 mg epidural morphine.
AbstractList BACKGROUND:A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we sought to establish whether half the traditional dose of epidural morphine, when administered as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean delivery, was associated with noninferior analgesia and fewer adverse effects. METHODS:Ninety term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mg epidural morphine or, half this dose, 1.5 mg epidural morphine. In addition, subjects received regular systemic ketorolac and acetaminophen. Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone) was administered for breakthrough pain. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in total opioid consumption (measured in median IV morphine equivalents) within the first 24 hours. A prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg was used. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption from 24 to 48 hours, numerical rating scale pain scores, time to first request for analgesics, overall pain relief, maternal satisfaction, quality of recovery, and adverse effects. RESULTS:Data were analyzed for 87 participants. Noninferiority was demonstrated as the difference in median 24-hour opioid consumption between the 1.5 mg epidural morphine (EM) and 3 mg EM groups was 0 mg (1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 mg), which was less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg. No significant differences were found between groups in the median 24- to 48-hour opioid consumption or the median total opioid consumption within 48 hours. Pain scores, overall pain relief, and satisfaction at 24 and 48 hours were not significantly different between groups. The 1.5 mg EM group had a lower incidence of moderate and severe pruritus at 6 and 12 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.44, 95% CI, 0.2–0.9 and RR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.2–0.8, respectively) and had less nausea and vomiting at 6 hours (RR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05–0.9). There was no difference in average pain scores at 12 weeks between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION:When used as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen, 1.5 mg epidural morphine provided noninferior postcesarean analgesia and caused fewer adverse effects compared with 3 mg epidural morphine.
A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we sought to establish whether half the traditional dose of epidural morphine, when administered as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen after cesarean delivery, was associated with noninferior analgesia and fewer adverse effects. Ninety term parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under epidural anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either 3 mg epidural morphine or, half this dose, 1.5 mg epidural morphine. In addition, subjects received regular systemic ketorolac and acetaminophen. Rescue analgesia (oral oxycodone) was administered for breakthrough pain. The primary outcome was the difference between groups in total opioid consumption (measured in median IV morphine equivalents) within the first 24 hours. A prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg was used. Secondary outcomes included total opioid consumption from 24 to 48 hours, numerical rating scale pain scores, time to first request for analgesics, overall pain relief, maternal satisfaction, quality of recovery, and adverse effects. Data were analyzed for 87 participants. Noninferiority was demonstrated as the difference in median 24-hour opioid consumption between the 1.5 mg epidural morphine (EM) and 3 mg EM groups was 0 mg (1-sided 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5 mg), which was less than the prespecified noninferiority margin of 3.33 mg. No significant differences were found between groups in the median 24- to 48-hour opioid consumption or the median total opioid consumption within 48 hours. Pain scores, overall pain relief, and satisfaction at 24 and 48 hours were not significantly different between groups. The 1.5 mg EM group had a lower incidence of moderate and severe pruritus at 6 and 12 hours (relative risk [RR] 0.44, 95% CI, 0.2-0.9 and RR 0.41, 95% CI, 0.2-0.8, respectively) and had less nausea and vomiting at 6 hours (RR 0.22, 95% CI, 0.05-0.9). There was no difference in average pain scores at 12 weeks between the 2 groups. When used as part of a multimodal analgesia regimen, 1.5 mg epidural morphine provided noninferior postcesarean analgesia and caused fewer adverse effects compared with 3 mg epidural morphine.
Author Jones, and Philip M.
Singh, Sudha I.
Rehou, Sarah
Marmai, Kristine L.
AuthorAffiliation From the Departments of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital-LHSC, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Victoria Hospital-LHSC, and Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: From the Departments of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital-LHSC, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Victoria Hospital-LHSC, and Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
– name: From the Departments of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital-LHSC, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, †Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St. Joseph’s Hospital, ‡Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Victoria Hospital-LHSC, and §Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Sudha
  surname: Singh
  middlename: I.
  fullname: Singh, Sudha I.
  organization: From the Departments of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, University Hospital-LHSC, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, St. Joseph’s Hospital, Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, Victoria Hospital-LHSC, and Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sarah
  surname: Rehou
  fullname: Rehou, Sarah
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Kristine
  surname: Marmai
  middlename: L.
  fullname: Marmai, Kristine L.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: and Philip
  surname: Jones
  middlename: M.
  fullname: Jones, and Philip M.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23921652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkNtKAzEQhoMoWg9vIJIXWJ0km3bjXdF6AE9IvV6yycRGt5uStEp9elOqXnihA8McmO-H-XfJZhc6JOSQwTHjTJwM70bH0AATKFjFlXGWsw3SY5L3i4FU1SbpAYAouFJqh-ym9JJHBlV_m-xwoTjrS94jaTxBOnLOG22WNDjK6XlImFbtaObtIuqW3oY4m_gOqQuRPoQ0N5h0RN3Rc2z9G8YlHXa6fcbk9Skd0kfd2TD1H2jpXeh85zD6EP18ScfR63afbDndJjz4qnvk6WI0Prsqbu4vr8-GN4URElhhSzQlMmNtpRphlBBgrcyvl4hoB6ICm1cwGPDKytKBESAbppUV1khTNmKPlGtdE0NKEV09i36q47JmUK88rLOH9W8PM3a0xmaLZor2B_o2LR9U64P30M4xptd28Y6xnqBu55P_tMs_UFiFFKrgGQOVhyInB_EJRB2Sjw
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x
10.1213/00000539-200004000-00021
10.1080/10543400600609478
10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.012
10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018
10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36
10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de0e6d
10.1016/j.jopan.2009.03.005
10.1097/01.aco.0000192815.22989.61
10.1007/BF03006481
10.1213/00000539-199901000-00016
10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright International Anesthesia Research Society
2013 International Anesthesia Research Society
Copyright_xml – notice: International Anesthesia Research Society
– notice: 2013 International Anesthesia Research Society
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
DOI 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829cfd21
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
EISSN 1526-7598
EndPage 685
ExternalDocumentID 10_1213_ANE_0b013e31829cfd21
23921652
10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829cfd21
00000539-201309000-00020
Genre Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.-D
.XZ
.Z2
01R
026
0R~
1J1
23M
2WC
40H
4Q1
4Q2
4Q3
5GY
5RE
5VS
71W
77Y
7O~
AAAAV
AAAXR
AAGIX
AAHPQ
AAIQE
AAJCS
AAMOA
AAMTA
AARTV
AASOK
AAUEB
AAWTL
AAXQO
ABBUW
ABDIG
ABJNI
ABOCM
ABPPZ
ABXVJ
ABZAD
ACCJW
ACDDN
ACEWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACILI
ACWDW
ACWRI
ACXNZ
ADBBV
ADGGA
ADHPY
AE6
AEETU
AENEX
AFDTB
AFEXH
AFMFG
AFUWQ
AGINI
AHOMT
AHQNM
AHVBC
AHXIK
AIJEX
AINUH
AJIOK
AJNWD
AJZMW
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJPA
AMNEI
AWKKM
BAWUL
BOYCO
BQLVK
C45
CS3
DIK
DIWNM
DUNZO
E.X
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EX3
F2K
F2L
F2M
F2N
F5P
FCALG
FL-
FRP
FW0
GX1
H0~
HZ~
IKREB
IKYAY
IN~
JF9
JG8
JK3
JK8
K8S
KD2
KMI
L-C
L7B
MZP
N9A
N~7
N~B
O9-
OAG
OAH
OB4
ODA
ODMTH
OHYEH
OJAPA
OK1
OL1
OLG
OLH
OLL
OLU
OLV
OLW
OLY
OLZ
OPUJH
OVD
OVDNE
OVIDH
OVLEI
OVOZU
OWBYB
OWU
OWV
OWW
OWX
OWY
OWZ
OXXIT
P2P
PONUX
RLZ
S4R
S4S
TEORI
TR2
V2I
VVN
W3M
W8F
WOQ
WOW
X3V
X3W
XXN
XYM
YFH
YOC
ZFV
ZZMQN
.55
.GJ
08R
1CY
3O-
53G
AAPBV
AAQKA
AAQQT
AAUGY
ABASU
ABKPX
ACLED
ADFPA
ADNKB
AE3
AEBDS
AFFNX
AHRYX
AJNYG
AJRGT
AKALU
AKULP
ALMTX
AMKUR
AOHHW
BS7
C1A
EEVPB
GNXGY
GQDEL
IPNFZ
J5H
M18
N4W
N~M
OCUKA
ORVUJ
OUVQU
P-K
R58
RIG
TSPGW
TWZ
X7M
YQJ
ZA5
ZGI
ZXP
AASCR
ABVCZ
ACLDA
ACXJB
AFSOK
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
ERAAH
HLJTE
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3501-d4ec4e1cdd89b3c9330dd52134eeed7380d33007728d54f0c305b1a9d3dc5c4b3
ISSN 0003-2999
IngestDate Thu Nov 21 23:33:22 EST 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:48:26 EDT 2024
Sun Oct 29 17:13:30 EDT 2023
Thu Nov 14 18:59:42 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3501-d4ec4e1cdd89b3c9330dd52134eeed7380d33007728d54f0c305b1a9d3dc5c4b3
PMID 23921652
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs crossref_primary_10_1213_ANE_0b013e31829cfd21
pubmed_primary_23921652
wolterskluwer_health_10_1213_ANE_0b013e31829cfd21
wolterskluwer_health_00000539-201309000-00020
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-September-01
2013-September
2013-Sep
2013-09-00
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-September-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Anesthesia and analgesia
PublicationTitleAlternate Anesth Analg
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher International Anesthesia Research Society
Publisher_xml – name: International Anesthesia Research Society
References Carvalho (R11-20-20210902) 2010; 19
Fuller (R4-20-20210902) 1990; 37
Williamson (R7-20-20210902) 2005; 14
Pasero (R10-20-20210902) 2009; 24
Farrar (R8-20-20210902) 2010; 112
Coombs (R14-20-20210902) 1982; 154
Palmer (R17-20-20210902) 2000; 90
Myles (R9-20-20210902) 1999; 88
Lavandhomme (R2-20-20210902) 2006; 19
Haukoos (R12-20-20210902) 2005; 12
Pan (R16-20-20210902) 2006; 15
Chen (R13-20-20210902) 2006; 16
Jones (R15-20-20210902) 1996; 313
References_xml – volume: 14
  start-page: 798
  year: 2005
  ident: R7-20-20210902
  article-title: Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.
  publication-title: J Clin Nurs
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x
  contributor:
    fullname: Williamson
– volume: 90
  start-page: 887
  year: 2000
  ident: R17-20-20210902
  article-title: Postcesarean epidural morphine: a dose-response study.
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-200004000-00021
  contributor:
    fullname: Palmer
– volume: 16
  start-page: 357
  year: 2006
  ident: R13-20-20210902
  article-title: A bootstrap-based test for establishing noninferiority in clinical trials.
  publication-title: J Biopharm Stat
  doi: 10.1080/10543400600609478
  contributor:
    fullname: Chen
– volume: 19
  start-page: 10
  year: 2010
  ident: R11-20-20210902
  article-title: Analgesic requirements and postoperative recovery after scheduled compared to unplanned cesarean delivery: a retrospective chart review.
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2009.02.012
  contributor:
    fullname: Carvalho
– volume: 12
  start-page: 360
  year: 2005
  ident: R12-20-20210902
  article-title: Advanced statistics: bootstrapping confidence intervals for statistics with difficult distributions.
  publication-title: Acad Emerg Med
  doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.11.018
  contributor:
    fullname: Haukoos
– volume: 313
  start-page: 36
  year: 1996
  ident: R15-20-20210902
  article-title: Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods.
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7048.36
  contributor:
    fullname: Jones
– volume: 112
  start-page: 1464
  year: 2010
  ident: R8-20-20210902
  article-title: A comparison of change in the 0-10 numeric rating scale to a pain relief scale and global medication performance scale in a short-term clinical trial of breakthrough pain intensity.
  publication-title: Anesthesiology
  doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181de0e6d
  contributor:
    fullname: Farrar
– volume: 24
  start-page: 186
  year: 2009
  ident: R10-20-20210902
  article-title: Assessment of sedation during opioid administration for pain management.
  publication-title: J Perianesth Nurs
  doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2009.03.005
  contributor:
    fullname: Pasero
– volume: 154
  start-page: 385
  year: 1982
  ident: R14-20-20210902
  article-title: Epidurally administered morphine for postcesarean analgesia.
  publication-title: Surg Gynecol Obstet
  contributor:
    fullname: Coombs
– volume: 19
  start-page: 244
  year: 2006
  ident: R2-20-20210902
  article-title: Postcesarean analgesia: effective strategies and association with chronic pain.
  publication-title: Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
  doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192815.22989.61
  contributor:
    fullname: Lavandhomme
– volume: 37
  start-page: 636
  year: 1990
  ident: R4-20-20210902
  article-title: Epidural morphine for analgesia after caesarean section: a report of 4880 patients.
  publication-title: Can J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1007/BF03006481
  contributor:
    fullname: Fuller
– volume: 88
  start-page: 83
  year: 1999
  ident: R9-20-20210902
  article-title: Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults.
  publication-title: Anesth Analg
  doi: 10.1213/00000539-199901000-00016
  contributor:
    fullname: Myles
– volume: 15
  start-page: 185
  year: 2006
  ident: R16-20-20210902
  article-title: Post cesarean delivery pain management: multimodal approach.
  publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004
  contributor:
    fullname: Pan
SSID ssj0001086
Score 2.3046982
Snippet BACKGROUND:A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we...
A single dose of epidural morphine is effective in reducing pain after cesarean delivery but is associated with adverse effects. In this study, we sought to...
SourceID crossref
pubmed
wolterskluwer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 677
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Analgesia, Obstetrical - methods
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Analgesics, Opioid - adverse effects
Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - therapeutic use
Cesarean Section
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Ketorolac - therapeutic use
Morphine - administration & dosage
Morphine - adverse effects
Morphine - therapeutic use
Nausea - chemically induced
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Patient Satisfaction
Pregnancy
Pruritus - chemically induced
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Title The Efficacy of 2 Doses of Epidural Morphine for Postcesarean Delivery Analgesia: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial
URI http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00000539-201309000-00020
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23921652
Volume 117
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1LbxMxELbS9oKEEIhXeMkHbpXFxvY-3FugqbjQAwSJ22rX41UiSDfqNkLi13fG3lfaguDAZbVyVp7NzJfx-ItnhrG3lYwUxgFS6CKOhDZJJUrQUiSF0omt8Kde-tYJX9Lzb9npQi8mk67N1jD2Xy2NY2hrypz9B2v3k-IA3qPN8YpWx-tf291RXQjq446RoDyGugmVZd12Db7KxqZG7VJ4SWcMt3Vzhc6iuCROHtwPOqhBRZmoAUizLkI2NK5oUG_Wv-iwABG4FX6VmvreHfu2H-MQd47OE6PKJmR7DRP1XA4ulqtwIAhWxcDafnareneLpP5ElPt6cEf40j1dPfQZ8KxQS-y2FAa1kzAdheFatysTkcahH3Xvl0NSZwtANfKySej8csv7y5mvQnG-GOhdaWwFIQd7ZPztxltfYnA4S0IF3RtVt7uPDtiRRBeGHvRofna6fN-v8tShqk3FRLHv7hJKhabbafainj7Uuf-zpiMRzXefETGKa5YP2YN2Q8LnAUmP2MRdPGYNooh3KOJ1xSX3KKLbDkW8QxFHFPExiniHIt4b_4QXfMAQ38cQ9xh6wr6eLZYfPoq2PYew9G-0AO2sdjMLkJlSWWLGAGKqEOgw8EpVFgEORbh9yyDWVWRxaSlnhQEFNra6VE_ZIYpzzxmXUIBRBpIkM1paWZoqUtbaWOsUCpVOmejUl29DFZacdq8oLEfN5zc1P2XPgo77pztD4Ex7Ss9DunHuN8uxMoLwGZm23oKMpmx25_N_kv7it9JfsnsD_l-xw6vLnXvNDhrYvWnxdQ17KKI_
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934,64549,64569,65344,65364
linkProvider Ovid
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV1Lj9MwELagewAJ8RCv8vQB5RZIbCeNkXqI2ixb6EaIFgGnKPHYqNolqcguaPn1zKRpYREgceEUK7JiRTOe-TyemY-xJ04EEnGA8FUZBb7SsfMrUMKPS6li43CrVx11wmKUv0-mGbXJ2eaqUvFZu35Kj85M04DocOhcuBy_XHh59m4xrr3JYjL-4L1OX2RdmJqSJLzpuPniTrw079KvULk0qgCaaN0XTws82e_FkVRqwPbSyWw-25lsohvaUuuhfdZ9jZ0I5bM0z34EC4U2DkR4zoftHNeVrw1dcLdHXX77T15q_9p_-r_r7GoPY3m60bsb7IKtb7IWdY5n1JOiNGe8cVzwadPalobZegXU4YMfNihZhLYc0TInqmA0VCUi15pP7TEliZxxapTy0bar8jlP-ZuyhubT6psFnlPo2OGWaYhxjy9p79xib_ez5eTA70kdfEN3mD4oa5QNDUCiK2kongIQUV85i-56JJMA8FWAoD-BSLnAoEGqwlKDBBMZVcnbbFA3tb3LuIAStNQQx4lWwohKu0AaYyKlRlDK0ZD5WzEV603vjoLOPLhYgWItfhXrkN3ZyHI3WyB6DONI4JfOCbfYFKkWfxLEkIW_nf-31e_94xqP2aWD5eG8mM_yV_fZZdHRdFDu2wM2OPl8ah-yiy2cPupV_TvY5gTo
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwvV3di9NAEF_0DkQQP1DP-rkPkrdosrtJs0IeQpNq9QyHrahPIdnZSPEuKeZOqX-9M2laPVHBF5-yhCVLmO_Zmfkx9rgWnkQ_QLiqDDxX6bB2K1DCDUupQlOjqFc9dMJ8nL-P0ozG5Gxv8Kn5rFs9oUevpmlBcDgUFy7il3NnMp_EH5w8ezePc-coeZ71aWoqknCO0mm8dtK4_VKfOkneF2Ehi2lkBFTUemihFhjf79MYKxSB_WQyO5ztFDeBDm0B9lBL66HTTvjyaZJnP1KGQpsahH_Oku3M15WvLV1zd5_6KvefbNX02n_9y-vs6uDS8mTDgzfYBdvcZB3yH89oPkVp1rytueBp29mOltlqCTTtg79ukcro5nL0nDnBBqPSKtGLbXhqj6lgZM1paMpH2y3LZzzhb8oG2pPlNws8pzRyjeLTEvoeX5Ac3WJvp9li8sIdAB5cQ_eZLihrlPUNQKQraSi3AhDQjDmLpnssIw_wlYcBQASBqj2DyqnySw0STGBUJW-zvaZt7B3GBZSgpYYwjLQSRlS69qQxJlBqDKUcj5i7JVax2szxKCj-wcMKJG7xK3FH7GBD0d1ugZ6kHwYCv3SOxMWmYbX4EyFGzP_t_r-dfvcfz3jELiFfFIez_NU9dln0iB1UBnef7Z1-PrMP2MUOzh4O_P4dkLMHyg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+efficacy+of+2+doses+of+epidural+morphine+for+postcesarean+delivery+analgesia%3A+a+randomized+noninferiority+trial&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia+and+analgesia&rft.au=Singh%2C+Sudha+I&rft.au=Rehou%2C+Sarah&rft.au=Marmai%2C+Kristine+L&rft.au=Jones%2C+Philip+M&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.volume=117&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213%2FANE.0b013e31829cfd21&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F23921652&rft.externalDocID=23921652
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0003-2999&client=summon