Ethical Conflicts for Clinicians under Tennessee Abortion Law

Tennessee’s new restrictive abortion law poses harms to pregnant patients and conflicts with ethical commitments that any medical professional participating in the care of pregnant patients should be able to endorse.

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	The New England journal of medicine Vol. 388; no. 19; pp. 1735 - 1737
Main Authors:	McCarthy, Allison M., Boos, Elise W., Anani, Uchenna E., Clayton, Ellen W.
Format:	Journal Article
Language:	English
Published:	United States Massachusetts Medical Society 11-05-2023
Subjects:	Abortion Abortion, Induced - ethics Abortion, Induced - legislation & jurisprudence Abortion, Legal - ethics Abortion, Legal - legislation & jurisprudence and Education and Education General Cesarean section Clinical Medicine Clinical Medicine General Ethics Ethics, Clinical Female Fetuses Gynecology Gynecology General Health Law Health Policy Humans Medical Ethics Medical personnel Medical Practice Mortality Obstetrics Patients Physicians Physicians - ethics Physicians - legislation & jurisprudence Pregnancy Professionals Tennessee Training Vagina Tennessee United States > US Medical Practice Health Policy Medicine and the Law Medical Ethics and Human Rights
Online Access:	Get full text
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Description
Summary:	Tennessee’s new restrictive abortion law poses harms to pregnant patients and conflicts with ethical commitments that any medical professional participating in the care of pregnant patients should be able to endorse.
Bibliography:	ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23
ISSN:	0028-4793 1533-4406
DOI:	10.1056/NEJMp2303213