Clinical audit: development of the criteria of good practices

• Published in: Radiation protection dosimetry Vol. 147; no. 1-2; pp. 30 - 33
• Main Authors: Soimakallio, S., Alanen, A., Järvinen, H., Ahonen, A., Ceder, K., Lyyra-Laitinen, T., Paunio, M., Sinervo, T., Wigren, T.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Oxford University Press 01-09-2011
• Subjects: Clinical Audit; Dosimetry; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiology - standards; Reviews
• ISSN: 0144-8420; 1742-3406
• DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncr260

Clinical audit is a systematic review of the procedures in order to improve the quality and the outcome of patient care, whereby the procedures are examined against agreed standards for good medical RADIOLOGICAL procedures. The criteria of good procedures (i.e. the good practice) are thus the cornerstones for development of clinical audits: these should be the basis of assessments regardless of the type of the audit-external, internal, comprehensive or partial. A lot of criteria for good practices are available through the recommendations and publications by international and national professional societies and other relevant organisations. For practical use in clinical audits, the criteria need to be compiled, sorted out and agreed on for the particular aims of an audit (comprehensive or partial, external or internal). The national professional and scientific societies can provide valuable contribution to this development. For examination-or treatment-specific criteria-preliminary consensus needs to be obtained with the help of clinical experts, while clinical audits can be useful as a benchmarking tool to improve the criteria.