Comparison of recirculating, static, and elutriate aquatic sediment bioassay procedures

Acute sediment toxicity tests are commonly used to measure potential harm to biological communities. Results are presented from a study that compared the data from tests utilizing recirculating, static, and elutriate techniques for measuring the toxicity of various sediments to Daphnia magna. Each t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology Vol. 56; no. 5; pp. 742 - 749
Main Authors: SCHUYTEMA, G. S, NEBEKER, A. V, CAIRNS, M. A
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York, NY Springer-Verlag 01-05-1996
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Acute sediment toxicity tests are commonly used to measure potential harm to biological communities. Results are presented from a study that compared the data from tests utilizing recirculating, static, and elutriate techniques for measuring the toxicity of various sediments to Daphnia magna. Each technique is described. The frequency of similar test conclusions for sediments contaminated primarily by metals ranged 0.73 0.82, and the frequency of similarity was higher for initial and final recirculating tests. For sediments contaminated primarily with organic pollutants, the average frequency of similarity of test conclusion ranged 0.33 0.80, and the initial and final static tests had a higher frequency of similarity. The overall data suggested that the three test types generally result in similar conclusions regarding toxicity approximately three-quarters of the time in the case of sediments contaminated primarily with metals, while similar conclusions may be reached less often in the case of organic contaminants.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-4861
1432-0800
DOI:10.1007/s001289900109