INTERFEROMETRIC PATH MODELS FOR GNSS GROUND-BASED PHASE ALTIMETRY

• Published in: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Vol. XLII-4/W18; pp. 597 - 603
• Main Authors: Khajeh, S., Ardalan, A. A., Schuh, H.
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Gottingen Copernicus GmbH 18-10-2019; Copernicus Publications
• Subjects: Accuracy; Altimetry; Altitude; Computer simulation; Doppler sonar; Elevation; Global navigation satellite system; Interferometry; Low altitude; Mapping; Navigation; Navigation satellites; Navigational satellites; Phase retrieval; Ray tracing; Reflectometry; Sea surface; Signal paths; Troposphere; Variation
• ISSN: 2194-9034; 1682-1750; 2194-9034
• DOI: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W18-597-2019

Altimetry by using GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite Systems) reflectometry is regarded as a new promising technique. One important step to utilize this technique is modeling the interferometric path (the difference between the direct and the reflected signal paths). This paper evaluates three models: the planar model, the planar model with tropospheric correction and a model based on ray-tracing. If decimeter level accuracy for water surface fluctuation is required, the planar model cannot be used when a receiver is at an altitude of a few hundred meters and observations are taken at low elevation angles. On the other hand, depending on the mapping function and zenith total delay in the tropospheric correction, the planar model with tropospheric correction can provide decimeter level accuracy for low altitude stations. If simulated observations with a 1 cm accuracy have been employed to estimate Sea Surface Height (SSH) by the model based on ray-tracing the numerical results present 1 cm as RMSE for phase retrieval and 5 cm for Doppler retrieval. The planar model with tropospheric correction does not yield RMSE better than some decimeters for the same condition.