Modulation of MEK activity during G‐CSF signaling alters proliferative versus differentiative balancing

Previous studies of the granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) receptor have demonstrated that discrete signals direct proliferative and maturation signaling. Receptor deletion/mutant studies have shown that although activation of the ras‐mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway is nece...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of hematology Vol. 68; no. 2; pp. 99 - 105
Main Authors: Baumann, Michael A., Paul, Cassandra C., Lemley‐Gillespie, Susan, Oyster, Marlo, Gomez‐Cambronero, Julian
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-10-2001
Wiley-Liss
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous studies of the granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) receptor have demonstrated that discrete signals direct proliferative and maturation signaling. Receptor deletion/mutant studies have shown that although activation of the ras‐mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinase pathway is necessary for G‐CSF directed proliferation, it is not necessary for maturation induced by this cytokine. We have assessed the effects of selective inhibition or overexpression of MAP kinase kinase (MEK) in a cell line model of G‐CSF‐induced neutrophil progenitor growth. Using the human G‐CSF responsive MPD cell line, we specifically inhibited MEK using PD 98059 and also transfected MPD cells with a constitutively active MEK construct. We then exposed the cells to G‐CSF and assessed the effects of MEK inhibition and forced expression on proliferation and differentiation. Inhibition of MEK followed by G‐CSF stimulation consistently resulted in an early 2.5‐fold increase in morphologically differentiated neutrophils expressing CD11b and CD16 and containing lactoferrin over that produced by G‐CSF alone. MEK inhibition alone had little effect on the differentiation stage of these cells, although proliferation was impaired. Forced expression of activated MEK resulted in a three‐ to five‐fold decrease in differentiated, lactoferrin containing neutrophilic cells resultant from G‐CSF induction, and a commensurate increase in cell proliferation. These observations suggest that modulation of MAPK activation may be a control point for altering the balance between proliferation and differentiation in response to G‐CSF. Physiologically, this control is likely exerted by costimulatory cytokines. Am. J. Hematol. 68:99–105, 2001. Published 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Bibliography:This article is a U.S. Government work and, as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0361-8609
1096-8652
DOI:10.1002/ajh.1160