Awareness affects the response of human subjects exposed to a single whiplash-like perturbation

• Published in: Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Vol. 28; no. 7; pp. 671 - 679
• Main Authors: SIEGMUND, Gunter P, SANDERSON, David J, MYERS, Barry S, INGLIS, J. Timothy
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Philadelphia, PA Lippincott 01-04-2003; Hagerstown, MD
• Subjects: Acceleration; Adult; Awareness - physiology; Biological and medical sciences; Biomechanical Phenomena; Cues; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording; Electromyography; Female; Head Movements - physiology; Humans; Injuries of the limb. Injuries of the spine; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Neck Muscles - physiology; Nervous system; Posture - physiology; Reaction Time; Reflex - physiology; Sex Factors; Traumas. Diseases due to physical agents; Human; Pathophysiology; gender; neck muscles; Diseases of the osteoarticular system; Traffic accident; Anticipation; Spine disease; reflex; Trauma; Biomechanics; Electrodiagnosis; Kinematics; Sternocleidomastoid muscle; Musculature; Electromyography; Neck; Cervical spine; whiplash
• ISSN: 0362-2436; 1528-1159
• DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000051911.45505.D3

Human subjects were exposed experimentally to a single whiplash-like perturbation.
To determine how awareness of the presence and timing of a whiplash-like perturbation affects the onset and amplitude of the neck muscle response and the peak magnitude of head and neck kinematics.
Although most whiplash injuries are sustained in rear-end collisions, which occur without warning, most studies of whiplash injury have used subjects aware of the imminent perturbation.
Seated subjects (35 women and 31 men) underwent a single forward horizontal perturbation (peak acceleration, 1.5 g). Surface electromyography measured the sternocleidomastoid and cervical paraspinal muscle activity. Three awareness conditions were tested: a countdown for subjects alerted to their perturbation, a perturbation without an alert for subjects who expected it within 60 seconds, and an unexpected perturbation for surprised subjects who were deceived.
The muscle and kinematic responses of aware (alerted and unalerted) subjects were not significantly different. Sternocleidomastoid activation occurred 7 ms later in surprised subjects than in aware subjects (P < 0.0002). Cervical paraspinal amplitudes were 260% larger and angular head accelerations in flexion were 180% larger in surprised male subjects than in alerted male subjects. Surprised female subjects exhibited a 25% larger head retraction and a 30% lower forward acceleration of the mastoid process than aware female subjects.
The larger retractions observed in surprised females likely produce larger tissue strains and may increase injury potential. Aware human subjects may not replicate the muscle response, kinematic response, or whiplash injury potential of unprepared occupants in real collisions.