Evaluation of Sorbent Sampling and Analysis Procedures for Acetone in Workplace Air: Variations of Concentration and Relative Humidity

• Published in: Annals of work exposures and health Vol. 64; no. 1; pp. 96 - 105
• Main Authors: Soo, Jhy-Charm, Lebouf, Ryan F, Chisholm, William P, Nelson, John, Roberts, Jennifer, Kashon, Michael L, Lee, Eun Gyung, Harper, Martin
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01-01-2020
• Subjects: Acetone - analysis; Adsorption; Air Pollutants, Occupational - analysis; Humidity; Occupational Exposure - analysis; Workplace; beaded active carbon; acetone; silica gel; carbon molecular sieve; sorbent tube sampling
• DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxz087
• EISSN: 2398-7316
• ISSN: 2398-7308

This study experimentally evaluates the performance of different sorbent tubes for sampling acetone vapor in workplace air. A dynamic atmosphere system produced an acetone alone and a mixture with other analytes containing ~73, 483, and 1898 µg acetone mass loading at 25, 50, and 75% relative humidity (RH) at 25°C. Sorbent samples were analyzed in accordance with OSHA Method 69 (Carbosieve S-III) and NMAM 1501, modified to use Anasorb 747 sorbent. Both methods were modified to include the additional analytes. Additional extraction procedures with and without 1% dimethylformamide and anhydrous magnesium sulfate were included in the modified NMAM 1501 using Anasorb 747. Silica gel sorbent tubes analyzed according to NMAM 2027 were included. There were significant reductions in the recovery of acetone from both Anasorb 747 and Carbosieve S-III collected from air at 75% RH, relative to collection at 25 or 50% RH at very low loading compared with that of samples collected at mid to high loading. Silica gel provided a consistent recovery of acetone at all RHs and in the presence of other chemical interferences at 75% RH. The likely cause of mass dependence may arise from the humidity effect on acetone adsorption onto both beaded active carbon and carbon molecular sieve either in sampling or in analysis. The present study confirms not only previous observations but also adds to the literature showing carbonaceous sorbents are not well suited for sampling ketones at high humidity and low concentration.