Cognitive-behavioral therapy for treating hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

• Published in: Psychology, health & medicine Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 411 - 426
• Main Authors: Walker, Marthina S., Figueiredo, Natália R., de Lara Machado, Wagner, Costa, Caroline A. D., Feoli, Ana Maria P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England Taylor & Francis 15-03-2024; Taylor & Francis Ltd
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Behavior modification; Bias; Blood Pressure; Body mass index; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; cognitive behavioral therapy, blood pressure; Cognitive therapy; Cognitive-behavioral factors; Extraction; Heterogeneity; High risk; Humans; Hypertension; Hypertension - therapy; Meta-analysis; Random effects; Risk assessment; Synonyms; Systematic review; Hypertension; cognitive behavioral therapy; cognitive behavioral therapy, blood pressure
• ISSN: 1354-8506; 1465-3966; 1465-3966
• DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2023.2282958

The aim of the study is to investigate whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) can help in reducing blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension, both systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), this being the primary outcome. This was a systematic review with a meta-analysis that followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. The keywords used for the searches were CBT and hypertension and their respective synonyms, and were applied to the Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of Science databases. Eligibility and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers. They assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane's RoB 2 tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The data was pooled on the basis that all the analyses had a random effects model. Twenty-two studies were included in this review. In the meta-analysis, 11 studies were included in the analyses of the BP outcomes (SBP and DBP), five studies were included in the follow-up evaluation, and two studies in the body mass index (BMI) analysis. The searches included a total of 2897 patients. The studies presented a high risk of bias and very low quality of evidence. We observed an effect of −0.65 (95% CI: −0.91; −0.39) for CBT-based interventions on SBP with high heterogeneity (I
2
85%) and a higher effect of −0.78% (95% CI: −1.13; −0.43) on DBP with even greater heterogeneity (I
2
92%). We observed that CBT did have an effect on reducing BP and BMI in hypertensive adults. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity between the studies, the high risk of bias, and the low overall quality of evidence, confidence in these findings should be limited.