Transforming food systems: Multi-stakeholder platforms driven by consumer concerns and public demands
Food systems governance for healthy and sustainable diets remains a challenge. New structures are needed to better connect food systems actors. This paper argues that existing multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have the potential to contribute to food systems governance by facilitating linkages betw...
Saved in:
Published in: | Global food security Vol. 32; p. 100592 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier B.V
01-03-2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Food systems governance for healthy and sustainable diets remains a challenge. New structures are needed to better connect food systems actors. This paper argues that existing multi-stakeholder platforms (MSPs) have the potential to contribute to food systems governance by facilitating linkages between actors and scales. In a non-experimental study existing MSPs (n = 89) were explored in four countries addressing food and nutrition security. A diagnostic framework was used to identify MSP's capacities to address governance principles like system-based problem framing, boundary spanning, adaptability, inclusiveness, and transformative capacity. Existing MSPs can play a role in spanning boundaries, thereby increasing adaptability and learning, but seem less promising in shifting to systems-based narratives and thus may have limited capacity to truly transform food systems.
•Multistakeholder platforms are relevant in food systems governance for healthier diets.•Existing multistakeholder platforms are often overlooked as critical actors.•Multistakeholder platforms are not able to drive food systemic changes by themselves.•Key connectors are important as boundary spanners across scales.•Scholarly work on food systems and nutrition governance still seem separate domains. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2211-9124 2211-9124 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100592 |