Gender, Sexism, and Contempt in Candidate Evaluation

Several recent studies have shown that the emotion of contempt, which is often linked to negative appraisals of competence and integrity, is the most important negative emotion in some electoral contests. Furthermore, gender-based stereotypes and prejudice have been shown to cause voters to evaluate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of women, politics & policy Vol. 45; no. 4; pp. 394 - 410
Main Authors: Ditonto, Tessa, Mattes, Kyle
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 01-10-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Several recent studies have shown that the emotion of contempt, which is often linked to negative appraisals of competence and integrity, is the most important negative emotion in some electoral contests. Furthermore, gender-based stereotypes and prejudice have been shown to cause voters to evaluate female candidates in ways that seem contemptuous, i.e. as inferior and having undesirable traits. In this study, we analyze how sexism and gender-based prejudices may influence voters' emotions (especially their levels of contempt) in response to female political candidates in general and to those who violate gender norms. We find strong differences in emotional responses between sexist and nonsexist voters.
ISSN:1554-477X
1554-4788
DOI:10.1080/1554477X.2024.2300934