Permeability of Dental Adhesives – A SEM Assessment

Objectives: To morphologically evaluate the permeability of different commercial dental adhesives using scanning electron microscopy. Methods: Seven adhesive systems were evaluated: one three-step system (Scotchbond Multi- Purpose - MP); one two-step self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond – SE...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of dentistry Vol. 4; no. 4; pp. 429 - 439
Main Authors: Malacarne-Zanon, Juliana, de Andrade e Silva, Safira M., Wang, Linda, de Goes, Mario F., Martins, Adriano Luis, Narvaes-Romani, Eliene O., Anido-Anido, Andrea, Carrilho, Marcela R.O.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd 01-10-2010
Dental Investigations Society
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives: To morphologically evaluate the permeability of different commercial dental adhesives using scanning electron microscopy. Methods: Seven adhesive systems were evaluated: one three-step system (Scotchbond Multi- Purpose - MP); one two-step self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond – SE); three two-step etch-and-rinse systems (Single Bond 2 – SB; Excite – EX; One-Step – OS); and two single-step selfetching adhesives (Adper Prompt – AP; One-Up Bond F – OU). The mixture of primer and bond agents of the Clearfil SE Bond system (SE-PB) was also tested. The adhesives were poured into a brass mold (5.8 mm x 0.8 mm) and light-cured for 80 s at 650 mW/cm2. After a 24 h desiccation process, the specimens were immersed in a 50% ammoniac silver nitrate solution for tracer permeation. Afterwards, they were sectioned in ultra-fine slices, carbon-coated, and analyzed under backscattered electrons in a scanning electron microscopy. Results: MP and SE showed slight and superficial tracer permeation. In EX, SB, and OS, permeation extended beyond the inner superficies of the specimens. SE-PB did not mix well, and most of the tracer was precipitated into the primer agent. In AP and OU, “water-trees” were observed all over the specimens. Conclusions: Different materials showed distinct permeability in aqueous solution. The extent of tracer permeation varied according to the composition of each material and it was more evident in the more hydrophilic and solvated ones. (Eur J Dent 2010;4:429-439)
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1305-7456
1305-7464
DOI:10.1055/s-0039-1697863