State-of-the-art-myocardial perfusion stress testing: Static CT perfusion

Large multicenter studies and meta-analysis have documented the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic implications of stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and, mainly, nuclear stress tests. However, none of them provides a comprehensive anatomical and functional evaluation within the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography Vol. 14; no. 4; pp. 294 - 302
Main Authors: Mushtaq, Saima, Conte, Edoardo, Pontone, Gianluca, Baggiano, Andrea, Annoni, Andrea, Formenti, Alberto, Mancini, Maria Elisabetta, Guglielmo, Marco, Muscogiuri, Giuseppe, Tanzilli, Alessandra, Nicoli, Flavia, Bartorelli, Antonio L., Pepi, Mauro, Andreini, Daniele
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc 01-07-2020
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Large multicenter studies and meta-analysis have documented the diagnostic accuracy and the prognostic implications of stress echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance and, mainly, nuclear stress tests. However, none of them provides a comprehensive anatomical and functional evaluation within the same study as stress CT perfusion. Myocardial CT perfusion is the only non-invasive modality that allows to quantifying coronary stenosis and determining its functional relevance, constituting a potential “one-stop-shop” method for the diagnosis and global management of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. In comparison with the dynamic modality, that requires increased radiation, precise acquisition protocols and dedicated post-processing softwares, static CT perfusion was associated with less radiation exposure, non-inferior diagnostic accuracy, easier interpretation of images and is nowadays more widely available.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:1934-5925
1876-861X
DOI:10.1016/j.jcct.2019.09.002