Mentoring Minority Cancer Researchers of Tomorrow: Comparison of the Face-to-Face, Virtual, and Hybrid Training Methods of the CaRE2 Summer Cancer Research Education and Training Program

• Published in: Journal of cancer education Vol. 39; no. 4; pp. 405 - 412
• Main Authors: Mochona, Bereket, Redda, Kinfe K., Offringa, Ite A., Allen, John, Carpten, John D., Stern, Mariana C., Reams, Renee R., Wilkie, Diana J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01-08-2024; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Cancer; Cancer Research; Medical research; Mentors; Pandemics; Pharmacology/Toxicology; Research Training; Training Methods; Florida; United States > US; Undergraduate virtual/hybrid research training; Disparity in cancer research; Cancer disparity; Epidemiology; Underrepresented minority students
• ISSN: 0885-8195; 1543-0154; 1543-0154
• DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02426-9

In our previous publication, we reported a framework to develop an undergraduate cancer research training program at Florida A&M University (FAMU) under the umbrella of the Florida-California Cancer Research, Education, and Engagement (CaRE
2
) Health Equity Center activity by harnessing the resources available at FAMU, the University of Florida (UF), and the University of Southern California (USC) Cancer Centers. The implementation of the CaRE
2
face-to-face training platform was dramatically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic during the summer of 2020 and 2021 training periods. However, a concerted effort was made to restructure the face-to-face training model into virtual and hybrid training methods to maintain the continuity of the program during the pandemic. This article compared the three methods to identify the best platform for training URM students in cancer disparity research. The program’s effectiveness was measured through motivation, experiences, and knowledge gained by trainees during and one year after the completion of the program. The results showed that the participants were highly positive in their feedback about the professional and academic values of the program. Although the virtual and hybrid methods experienced significant challenges during the pandemic, the hybrid training module offered an “above average” effectiveness in performance, like the face-to-face mentoring platform in mentoring URM students in cancer disparity research.