Additive influences of soil and climate gradients drive tree community composition of Central African rain forests

• Published in: Journal of vegetation science Vol. 31; no. 6; pp. 1156 - 1169
• Main Authors: Libalah, Moses Bakonck, Droissart, Vincent, Sonké, Bonaventure, Barbier, Nicolas, Dauby, Gilles, Fortunel, Claire, Kamdem, Gyslene, Kamdem, Narcisse, Lewis, Simon L, Mofack, Gislain II, Momo, Stéphane Takoudjou, Pélissier, Raphaël, Ploton, Pierre, Texier, Nicolas, Zebazé, Donatien, Couteron, Pierre, Giesecke, Thomas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-11-2020
• Subjects: Abundance; Bioclimatology; Cameroon; climate gradient; Climate models; Community composition; Composition; Diameters; Environmental gradient; Forest management; Geographical distribution; Herbivores; Nutrients; Rain; Rainforests; soil gradient; Soils; species abundance; Species composition; species occurrence; Trees; Tropical forests; tropical rain forests; Variance; Vegetation; Vegetation patterns; Cameroon
• ISSN: 1100-9233; 1654-1103
• DOI: 10.1111/jvs.12918

Aim
Examining tree species–environment association can offer insight into the drivers of vegetation patterns and key information of practical relevance to forest management. Here, we aim to quantify the contribution of climate and soil gradients to variation in Central African tree species composition (abundance and occurrence).
Location
Tropical rain forests of southern and eastern Cameroon.
Methods
We established 82 1‐ha permanent plots across seven localities and censused all trees ≥10 cm in diameter, representing a total of 37,733 trees and 455 species. In 60 of those plots, we measured 10 soil variables describing texture and nutrients levels and extracted 10 bioclimatic variables from global‐gridded climate databases. We synthesized the main environmental gradients by conducting principal component analyses on climate and soil data, respectively. We performed unconstrained and constrained non‐symmetric correspondence analyses to account for the individual and joint contributions of climate and soil on species abundance and occurrence.
Results
Climate and soil contributed similarly to variances of species abundance and occurrence (12–15% variance for climate vs 11–12% variance for soil). Climate influence mostly concerns some abundant species, while some of the less abundant species were mainly driven by soil. Fractions of species variances accounted for by climate and soil show strong correlation when assessed from species occurrence and abundance data.
Conclusion
Variation in occurrence and abundance of tropical forest trees can be partly shaped by both climate and soil gradients in Cameroon, which emphasizes the importance to jointly consider soil and climate in species distribution modeling. Less abundant species may express environmental influence differently than abundant species and convey complementary information about community assemblage. Though showing congruent patterns here, species abundance and occurrence reflect different interacting community processes and both should be examined to better understand vegetation patterns.
This study used a consequential data set of several permanent 1‐ha plots to show that patterns from species abundances and occurrences are overall congruent and that climate and soil do not have the same influence on abundant and less abundant species.