The trouble with justification – Getting straight on the science and politics of nuclear energy

The way nuclear energy technology ‘escapes’ a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast with the way fossil fuel energy technologies are subject of global negotiations driven by the doom of climate change. The claim put forward is t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy strategy reviews Vol. 1; no. 4; pp. 233 - 242
Main Author: Meskens, Gaston
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 01-05-2013
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract The way nuclear energy technology ‘escapes’ a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast with the way fossil fuel energy technologies are subject of global negotiations driven by the doom of climate change. The claim put forward is that this ‘denial’ is a symptom of a contemporary settled ‘comfort of polarisation’ around the use of nuclear energy technology that is deeply rooted in the organisational structures of politics, science and informed civil society. The article argues for the need to develop a new rationale that aims to seek societal trust ‘by method instead of proof’, taking into account that the outcome of such a justification process might as well be an acceptance or a rejection of the technology. It sketches what this ‘deliberate-political’ approach would be in theory and practice, briefly hits at two contemporary myths that would relativize the need for this approach and concludes with a ‘pragmatic’ list of elements of an advanced framework for deliberation on nuclear energy technology and on energy in general. ► Nuclear has never been negotiated at UN energy and climate change conferences. ► This ‘denial’ is a symptom of a ‘comfort of polarisation’ around nuclear. ► A responsible safety culture and public info are insufficient conditions for societal trust. ► Society needs to develop a rationale that seeks trust ‘by method instead of proof’.
AbstractList The way nuclear energy technology ‘escapes’ a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast with the way fossil fuel energy technologies are subject of global negotiations driven by the doom of climate change. The claim put forward is that this ‘denial’ is a symptom of a contemporary settled ‘comfort of polarisation’ around the use of nuclear energy technology that is deeply rooted in the organisational structures of politics, science and informed civil society. The article argues for the need to develop a new rationale that aims to seek societal trust ‘by method instead of proof’, taking into account that the outcome of such a justification process might as well be an acceptance or a rejection of the technology. It sketches what this ‘deliberate-political’ approach would be in theory and practice, briefly hits at two contemporary myths that would relativize the need for this approach and concludes with a ‘pragmatic’ list of elements of an advanced framework for deliberation on nuclear energy technology and on energy in general. ► Nuclear has never been negotiated at UN energy and climate change conferences. ► This ‘denial’ is a symptom of a ‘comfort of polarisation’ around nuclear. ► A responsible safety culture and public info are insufficient conditions for societal trust. ► Society needs to develop a rationale that seeks trust ‘by method instead of proof’.
The way nuclear energy technology aescapesa a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast with the way fossil fuel energy technologies are subject of global negotiations driven by the doom of climate change. The claim put forward is that this adeniala is a symptom of a contemporary settled acomfort of polarisationa around the use of nuclear energy technology that is deeply rooted in the organisational structures of politics, science and informed civil society. The article argues for the need to develop a new rationale that aims to seek societal trust aby method instead of proofa, taking into account that the outcome of such a justification process might as well be an acceptance or a rejection of the technology. It sketches what this adeliberate-politicala approach would be in theory and practice, briefly hits at two contemporary myths that would relativize the need for this approach and concludes with a apragmatica list of elements of an advanced framework for deliberation on nuclear energy technology and on energy in general.
Author Meskens, Gaston
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Gaston
  surname: Meskens
  fullname: Meskens, Gaston
  email: gaston.meskens@sckcen.be
  organization: Science & Technology Studies Unit, Institute of Environment, Health and Safety, SCK•CEN, Belgium
BookMark eNp9kM9KAzEQh4NUsNY-gLccveyabDb7B09StAoFLxW8hWx2tk3ZJjXJKr35Dr6hT2JKe_DkXGYYft_AfJdoZKwBhK4pSSmhxe0mBe_SjFCWEpoSkp-hcZZRmuRF-Tb6M1-gqfcbEqvgtCRsjORyDTg4OzQ94E8d1ngz-KA7rWTQ1uCfr288hxC0WWEfnNSrdcBxHyLmlQajAEvT4p3tddDKY9thM6gepMNgwK32V-i8k72H6alP0Ovjw3L2lCxe5s-z-0WiGCMhgUbVoHKuqqLjbUPKvCGq47zkHacsrwsJTV3VGa0kpy2v25aVDUAe0xmDUrEJujne3Tn7PoAPYqu9gr6XBuzgBc3zKqM1Z1WM0mNUOeu9g07snN5KtxeUiINRsRHRqDgYFYSKaDQyd0cG4g8fGpw4vd9qByqI1up_6F8ONIIt
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jenvrad_2015_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1177_0146645316639837
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esr_2019_100427
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esr_2019_100408
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.073
10.1787/9789264991897-en
10.1007/BF02832229
10.1260/0958-305X.22.7.945
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 Elsevier Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 Elsevier Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
7ST
7U6
C1K
DOI 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004
DatabaseName CrossRef
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
DatabaseTitleList
Environment Abstracts
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
EISSN 2211-467X
EndPage 242
ExternalDocumentID 10_1016_j_esr_2013_01_004
S2211467X13000059
GroupedDBID --M
.~1
0R~
0SF
13V
1~.
1~5
4.4
457
4G.
7-5
8P~
AAAKF
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAHCO
AAIAV
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AARIN
AARJD
AAXUO
ABFYP
ABLST
ABMAC
ABMVD
ABUCO
ABXDB
ABYKQ
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACHRH
ACNTT
ACRLP
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
AEBSH
AEKER
AFKWA
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGHFR
AGJBL
AGUBO
AGUMN
AGYEJ
AHEUO
AHIDL
AIEXJ
AIKHN
AITUG
AJBFU
AJOXV
AKIFW
ALEQD
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMFUW
AMRAJ
APLSM
AXJTR
BCNDV
BELTK
BKOJK
BLECG
BLXMC
BNSAS
EBS
EFJIC
EFLBG
EJD
FDB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
GBLVA
GROUPED_DOAJ
HAMUX
HZ~
JARJE
KCYFY
KOM
M41
MO0
NCXOZ
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK1
P-8
P-9
PC.
Q38
RIG
ROL
SDF
SPC
SSB
SSD
SSJ
SSL
SSR
SSZ
T5K
~G-
AAQFI
AAXKI
AAYXX
ADVLN
AFJKZ
AKRWK
CITATION
7ST
7U6
C1K
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-ebc9ec45c86f5db074b0cf5575f513496aeb989218a51d59dd37bee46f523e7c3
ISSN 2211-467X
IngestDate Fri Oct 25 07:14:16 EDT 2024
Fri Nov 22 00:39:06 EST 2024
Fri Feb 23 02:31:50 EST 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Risk governance
Deliberative democracy
Transdisciplinarity
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c330t-ebc9ec45c86f5db074b0cf5575f513496aeb989218a51d59dd37bee46f523e7c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PQID 1448219538
PQPubID 23462
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1448219538
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esr_2013_01_004
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_esr_2013_01_004
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate May 2013
2013-05-00
20130501
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-05-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2013
  text: May 2013
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle Energy strategy reviews
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher Elsevier Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Ltd
References World Nuclear News (bib10) 25 June 2012
(bib32) 3 August 2012
NucNet, Three Bids Submitted For Czech Republic's Temelin-3 and -4, NucNet News in Brief/No. 146/2nd July 2012.
WWF, The Energy Report – 100% Renewables by 2050, 20£11, ISBN 978-2-940443-26-0.
Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release (bib19) 7 maart 2007
World Health Organisation (bib24) July 2011
EU 2012 (bib5) 26 April 2012
BBL & Greenpeace Information note, Profiel van de Commissie Energie 2030 – de Commissie D’haeseleer
Hore-Lacy (bib2) September 2011; 22
NEI, Enhancing Safety at America’s Nuclear Energy Facilities
DIRECTIVE 2003/35/EC Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Of 26 May 2003 Providing For Public Participation In Respect Of The Drawing Up Of Certain Plans And Programmes Relating To The Environment And Amending With Regard To Public Participation And Access To Justice Council Directives 85/337/Eec And 96/61/Ec
UN 2012a (bib12) 19 June 2012
Daily Mail Online (bib21) 24 March 2011
Sjoblom and Linsley (bib22) 1994; 2
Kircher, Seligson, Bouabid, Morrow (bib23) 2006
World Nuclear News (bib11) 26 June 2012
EurActiv Press Release, Greenpeace Praises EU Nuclear Stress Test ‘Transparency’, Published: 16 February 2012, Updated: 17 February 2012
Belgian Federal Planning Bureau (bib17) July 2006
Hisschemöller, Hoppe (bib27) 1996; 8
Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release (bib18) 17 november 2006
FORATOM (bib3) 9 November 2011
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (bib13) Monday, 14 May 2007; vol. 5
TEPCO (bib1) June 20, 2012
World Nuclear News (bib26) 09 July 2012
Youri Mossoux, La législation organisant la participation du public au processus de décision de l’administration fédérale et son application au secteur du nucléaire civil, Centre de Droit Public, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Paper in progress (no English translation available), in: Presented During the SCK•CEN – ULB Symposium ‘La mise en œuvre de la Convention d’Aarhus dans le secteur nucléaire en Belgique: transparence et participation du public dans les processus décisionnels’, 11 April 2011, Brussels
OECD-NEA (bib9) 2012
Der Spiegel Online (bib20) 14 March 2011
.
Meskens, Laes (bib28) November 2009
No English Translation Available.
Beerten, Laes, Meskens, D'haeseleer (bib25) 2009; 37
NucNet, Belarus ‘On Its Way’ To Being Prepared For First Nuclear Plant, Says IAEA, NucNet News No. 147/2 July 2012.
Commission On Energy 2030, The Belgian Energy Policy towards 2030 within a European Framework, Final Report, June 19, 2007
Ongoing Research Project, The Possibility of Global Governance, In Cooperation With The Centre for Ethics and Value Inquiry of the Faculty of Arts & Philosophy of the University of Ghent (Belgium)
Convention On Access To Information, Public Participation In Decision-Making And Access To Justice In Environmental Matters (Aarhus Convention), The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE)
Belgian Federal Planning Bureau (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib17) 2006
Sjoblom and Linsley (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib22) 1994; 2
Der Spiegel Online (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib20) 2011
World Nuclear News (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib11) 2012
UN 2012a (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib12) 2012
World Nuclear News (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib26) 2012
Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib19) 2007
World Health Organisation (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib24) 2011
Hore-Lacy (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib2) 2011; 22
Kircher (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib23) 2006
FORATOM (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib3) 2011
(10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib32) 2012
OECD-NEA (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib9) 2012
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib29
Earth Negotiations Bulletin (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib13) 2007; vol. 5
TEPCO (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib1) 2012
Hisschemöller (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib27) 1996; 8
Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib18) 2006
EU 2012 (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib5) 2012
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib6
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib4
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib8
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib7
World Nuclear News (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib10) 2012
Daily Mail Online (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib21) 2011
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib30
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib31
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib33
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib14
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib15
Beerten (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib25) 2009; 37
10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib16
Meskens (10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib28) 2009
References_xml – year: 25 June 2012
  ident: bib10
  article-title: British Businesses Remain Hungry for Nuclear
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
– year: 26 June 2012
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Apec Recognition for Nuclear Role
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
– year: 26 April 2012
  ident: bib5
  article-title: European Union Communication on the ‘Stress Tests and Peer Review Process’
  contributor:
    fullname: EU 2012
– year: July 2006
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Post-2012 Climate Policy: Analysis of Emissions Reduction Scenarios for 2020 and 2050, Executive Summary (English Version)
  contributor:
    fullname: Belgian Federal Planning Bureau
– volume: 22
  start-page: 945
  year: September 2011
  ident: bib2
  article-title: The future of nuclear energy post Fukushima
  publication-title: Energy & Environment
  contributor:
    fullname: Hore-Lacy
– year: 19 June 2012
  ident: bib12
  article-title: The Future We Want, UN Document A/CONF.216/L.1
  contributor:
    fullname: UN 2012a
– year: 17 november 2006
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Commissie energievooruitzichten tegen 2030: overhaaste en oppervlakkige reacties
  contributor:
    fullname: Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release
– volume: 2
  start-page: 12
  year: 1994
  end-page: 16
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Sea disposal of radioactive wastes: the London convention 1972
  publication-title: IAEA BULLETIN
  contributor:
    fullname: Sjoblom and Linsley
– year: November 2009
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Theoretical Perspectives on Participation and Democracy – The Possibility of Bridging the Gap between the Science of the Problems and the Politics of the Solutions
  contributor:
    fullname: Laes
– volume: 37
  start-page: 5056
  year: 2009
  end-page: 5068
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Greenhouse gas emissions in the nuclear life cycle: a balanced appraisal
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  contributor:
    fullname: D'haeseleer
– year: 3 August 2012
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Wind taken out of nuclear power’s sails
  publication-title: The Financial Times
– volume: vol. 5
  year: Monday, 14 May 2007
  ident: bib13
  publication-title: Summary Of The Fifteenth Session Of The Commission On Sustainable Development: 30 April - 11 May 2007, ENB
  contributor:
    fullname: Earth Negotiations Bulletin
– year: 7 maart 2007
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Energierapport van Commissie 2030: Geloofwaardige pistes en relevante aanbevelingen
  contributor:
    fullname: Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release
– year: 09 July 2012
  ident: bib26
  article-title: Public Trust Rests with Regulators
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
– year: June 20, 2012
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Press Release ‘Release of the Fukushima Nuclear Accidents Investigation Report’
  contributor:
    fullname: TEPCO
– year: 24 March 2011
  ident: bib21
  article-title: The Japanese Disaster PROVES the Value and Safety of Nuclear Power
  contributor:
    fullname: Daily Mail Online
– volume: 8
  start-page: 40
  year: 1996
  end-page: 60
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis
  publication-title: Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
  contributor:
    fullname: Hoppe
– year: 14 March 2011
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Japan's Chernobyl: Fukushima Marks the End of the Nuclear Era
  contributor:
    fullname: Der Spiegel Online
– year: 2006
  ident: bib23
  article-title: When the Big One Strikes Again: Estimated Losses Due to a Repeat of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake, Issued by the 1906 Earthquake Centennial Alliance
  contributor:
    fullname: Morrow
– year: July 2011
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Tobacco Fact Sheet N°339
  contributor:
    fullname: World Health Organisation
– year: 9 November 2011
  ident: bib3
  article-title: FORATOM 2012 Energy Roadmap 2050 Update
  contributor:
    fullname: FORATOM
– year: 2012
  ident: bib9
  article-title: The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Low-carbon Energy Future
  contributor:
    fullname: OECD-NEA
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib15
– volume: 2
  start-page: 12
  year: 1994
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib22
  article-title: Sea disposal of radioactive wastes: the London convention 1972
  publication-title: IAEA BULLETIN
  contributor:
    fullname: Sjoblom and Linsley
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib6
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib8
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib20
  contributor:
    fullname: Der Spiegel Online
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib12
  contributor:
    fullname: UN 2012a
– volume: 37
  start-page: 5056
  issue: 12
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib25
  article-title: Greenhouse gas emissions in the nuclear life cycle: a balanced appraisal
  publication-title: Energy Policy
  doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.073
  contributor:
    fullname: Beerten
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib26
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
– year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib28
  contributor:
    fullname: Meskens
– year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib19
  contributor:
    fullname: Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib29
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib30
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib21
  contributor:
    fullname: Daily Mail Online
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib3
  contributor:
    fullname: FORATOM
– volume: vol. 5
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib13
  contributor:
    fullname: Earth Negotiations Bulletin
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib9
  doi: 10.1787/9789264991897-en
  contributor:
    fullname: OECD-NEA
– year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib18
  contributor:
    fullname: Federation of Enterprises in Belgium (FEB) press release
– year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib23
  contributor:
    fullname: Kircher
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib14
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib16
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib33
– volume: 8
  start-page: 40
  issue: 4
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib27
  article-title: Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis
  publication-title: Knowledge and Policy: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer and Utilization
  doi: 10.1007/BF02832229
  contributor:
    fullname: Hisschemöller
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib5
  contributor:
    fullname: EU 2012
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib7
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib1
  contributor:
    fullname: TEPCO
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib4
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib32
  article-title: Wind taken out of nuclear power’s sails
  publication-title: The Financial Times
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib11
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
– ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib31
– year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib24
  contributor:
    fullname: World Health Organisation
– volume: 22
  start-page: 945
  issue: 7
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib2
  article-title: The future of nuclear energy post Fukushima
  publication-title: Energy & Environment
  doi: 10.1260/0958-305X.22.7.945
  contributor:
    fullname: Hore-Lacy
– year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib17
  contributor:
    fullname: Belgian Federal Planning Bureau
– year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004_bib10
  contributor:
    fullname: World Nuclear News
SSID ssj0000651703
Score 1.966189
Snippet The way nuclear energy technology ‘escapes’ a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast...
The way nuclear energy technology aescapesa a deliberate justification approach as an energy technology on a transnational level is today in sharp contrast...
SourceID proquest
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Publisher
StartPage 233
SubjectTerms Deliberative democracy
Risk governance
Transdisciplinarity
Title The trouble with justification – Getting straight on the science and politics of nuclear energy
URI https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2013.01.004
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1448219538
Volume 1
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Nb9MwGLbYdoDLxPgQGzAZiRNVUJM4dXKcoGwgwWVD6s2Kk9eHIrXT0h648R_4h_wSnje2267ANJC4RJHVxqnfp6-f99NCvKRKW12STkattYlKLSVl1jbAMsgpIIV7dg2cnetPk_LtWI3X-fPrsf8qaYxB1lw5-xfSXj0UA7iHzHGF1HG9tdwXV_MlV0T1TtYpn9flgmtuEJMb8sEp-ZRn9nWwhR7CBoNY6NN3EPDZcSHdo-EjJgbUVwte8-j7-sHON7r9GsphVmT9I3VfyNP105q55qanId3I6_Pur1gCs843gpbKYEEm0LYTv6H8Ziyq2Q00qU2V6RthhN038722flHs3scwfU0dN3FN877Xqj-4eKtf9jnPzpNzoI5ra3fEXgYtBCW4d_J-PPmwcsGBfaW6Pzt79cIx7t1nAG7N9SfmsrWH98Tk4r7YDxaFPPFQOBB3aPZA3I0F591DUQMSMkBCMiTkNUjIH9--ywAGGcEgMQ4wyAAGCTDICAY5dzKAQXowPBKf340v3pwl4WSNpMnz4SIh21TUqKIpR65oLWikHTauAHV3BferHNVkq7IC_auLtC2qts21JVL4dJaTbvLHYnc2n9ETISuCUZpnldV2qByMa5XVTis3Ki3bDu5QvIqrZi59AxUTMwunBktseInNMDVY4kOh4rqa8AM9szPAwU1fexFlYKAdOeRVz2i-7GDYqjLjSHF59G-Pfirurf8Kz8Tu4mpJz8VO1y6PA5x-AgsrikM
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934
linkProvider Elsevier
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+trouble+with+justification+%E2%80%93+Getting+straight+on+the+science+and+politics+of+nuclear+energy&rft.jtitle=Energy+strategy+reviews&rft.au=Meskens%2C+Gaston&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.pub=Elsevier+Ltd&rft.issn=2211-467X&rft.eissn=2211-467X&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.esr.2013.01.004&rft.externalDocID=S2211467X13000059
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2211-467X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2211-467X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2211-467X&client=summon