Raman spectroscopy as a novel method in placental research: Recognizing the pattern of placental hypoxia

Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a nonelastic photon scattering technique. We evaluated whether a specific RS pattern exists in fetal venous perfusates obtained at 30‐ to 60‐min intervals from the ex vivo human dual placental perfusion model under hypoxic (n = 6) and normoxic (n = 5) conditions. A stratif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Raman spectroscopy Vol. 48; no. 12; pp. 1896 - 1899
Main Authors: Schlabritz‐Loutsevitch, Natalia, Gandhi, Kushal, Soydemir, Fatimah, Brownbill, Paul, Sengar, Raghvendra, Ventolini, Gary, Bruillard, Paul, Gosink, Luke
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Bognor Regis Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-12-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a nonelastic photon scattering technique. We evaluated whether a specific RS pattern exists in fetal venous perfusates obtained at 30‐ to 60‐min intervals from the ex vivo human dual placental perfusion model under hypoxic (n = 6) and normoxic (n = 5) conditions. A stratified principle component and a linear support vector machine analyses showed that the separation between 2 conditions was readily feasible at 60–120 min of perfusion; after this, any apparent differences were most likely the result of artifact overfitting. This report is the first attempt to identify the RS fingerprint associated with placental hypoxia. Raman spectroscopy (RS) is a nonelastic photon scattering technique. We evaluated whether a specific RS pattern exists in fetal venous perfusates obtained at 30‐min intervals from the ex vivo human dual placental perfusion model under hypoxic (n = 6) and normoxic (n = 5) conditions, a stratified principle component and a linear support vector machine analyses showed that the separation between two conditions was readily feasible at 60–120 min of perfusion; after this, any apparent differences were most likely the result of artifact overfitting.
ISSN:0377-0486
1097-4555
DOI:10.1002/jrs.5229