Evaluation of different materials used for sealing of implant abutment access channel and the peri‐implant sulcus microbiota: A 6‐month, randomized controlled trial

• Published in: Clinical oral implants research Vol. 32; no. 8; pp. 941 - 950
• Main Authors: Rubino, Caroline V., Katz, Brandon G., Langlois, Kylie, Wang, Howard H., Carrion, Julio A., Walker, Stephen G., Collier, Jackie L., Iacono, Vincent J., Myneni, Srinivas R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Brussels Wiley Subscription Services, Inc 01-08-2021
• Subjects: abutment access channel sealing materials; Bacteria; Clinical trials; Cotton; Dental implants; dental prosthesis; Dentistry; Evaluation; fixed dental hybrid prostheses; Microbiota; Microleakage; Microorganisms; oral microbiome; Patients; peri‐implant microbiota; peri‐implant sulcus; Polytetrafluoroethylene; Sealing; Sealing materials; Siloxanes; Species diversity; Transplants & implants
• ISSN: 0905-7161; 1600-0501
• DOI: 10.1111/clr.13787

Objective
Peri‐implantitis has been attributed to a myriad of factors, including microleakage at the abutment‐implant interface. Implant abutment access channel sealing materials (IACSM) are readily used in implant dentistry, with little evidence on their effect on microleakage. This study aims to evaluate the effect of IACSM on the microbial composition in the implant access channel and the peri‐implant sulcus.
Methods
A total of n = 8 patients (64 implants) were included in this single‐blinded, randomized controlled trial, whereas four different materials (cotton, polytetrafluoroethylene [PTFE], synthetic foam, or polyvinyl siloxane [PVS]) were randomly placed as an IACSM. Following 6 months, microbial analysis was completed on the IACSM and samples from the peri‐implant sulci via PCR and high‐throughput sequencing. Bacterial samples on the IACSM and in the peri‐implant sulci were classified according to Socransky's microbial complexes.
Results
There was a preponderance of early colonizing bacteria within the IACSM, while the peri‐implant sulci were dominated by Orange complex bacteria. The proportion of Red and Orange complex members on the IACSM was significantly less than in the peri‐implant sulci. The proportion of Green, Yellow, and Blue complex members found on the IACSM was significantly greater than in the peri‐implant sulci. Atopobium, a diverse species not included in the microbial complexes, was frequently detected in the peri‐implant sulcus samples.
Conclusions
No detectable effects of IACSM on the microbial community in the peri‐implant sulcus or on the IACSM were identified. Variation of bacterial species was most dependent on the individual patient. No significant differences were found in the periodontal parameters between the different treatment groups.