Sentinel lymph node biopsy guideline concordance in melanoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database
Background and Objectives This study investigated the impact of treating facility type on guideline‐concordant sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) management in T1a* (defined as a Breslow depth <0.76 mm without ulceration or mitoses) and T2/T3 melanoma. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of surgical oncology Vol. 124; no. 4; pp. 669 - 678 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hoboken
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
01-09-2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background and Objectives
This study investigated the impact of treating facility type on guideline‐concordant sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) management in T1a* (defined as a Breslow depth <0.76 mm without ulceration or mitoses) and T2/T3 melanoma.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2012 to 2016.
Results
Our cohort included 109,432 patients. For T1a* melanomas, 85% of patients received guideline‐concordant SLNB management at community and academic facilities versus 75% of patients at integrated network facilities (p < .001). Over 83% of patients with T2/T3 melanoma treated at an academic facility received guideline‐concordant SLNB management versus 77% treated at a community facility (p < .001). Adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, integrated (adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 0.54), and comprehensive community (aOR = 0.74) facilities were less likely to provide guideline‐concordant SLNB management in patients with T1a* melanoma compared to academic facilities. Community facilities (aOR = 0.72) were less likely to provide guideline‐concordant SLNB management in patients with T2/T3 melanoma compared to academic facilities.
Conclusion
Academic facilities provide the highest rate of guideline‐concordant sentinel lymph node management. Comparatively, community programs may underutilize SLNB in T2/T3 disease, while integrated and comprehensive community facilities may over‐utilize SLNB in T1a* disease. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0022-4790 1096-9098 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jso.26565 |