Administering Audiometric Speech Tests via Bone Conduction: A Comparison of Transducers

• Published in: Ear and hearing Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 446 - 449
• Main Authors: Dolan, Thomas G, Morris, Sherry G
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Baltimore, MD Williams & Wilkins 01-12-1990; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Audiometry, Speech - methods; Biological and medical sciences; Bone Conduction - physiology; Electronics; Female; Humans; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects); Male; Medical sciences; Otorhinolaryngology functional investigation (larynx, voice, audiometry, vestibular function, equilibration...); Transducers; Vibration; Human; Transducer; Bone conduction; ENT disease; Audiometry; Comparative study
• ISSN: 0196-0202; 1538-4667
• DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199012000-00006

This study compared the intelligibility of speech delivered via three transducersa TDH-39 earphone, a Pracitronic KH 70 bone vibrator, and a Radioear 6-72 bone vibrator. CID W-1 spondees were presented to normal-hearing listeners via each transducer over a range of intensity levels. Functions relating the percentage of spondees correctly identified to stimulus level were similar for the three transducers, and notably, their slopes were comparable. This suggests that it is appropriate to use the W-1 word lists to determine speech reception thresholds (SRTs) with the KH 70 and 6-72 bone vibrators, even though these word lists were originally developed for testing by air conduction. Our subjects also identified NU-6 monosyllabic words equally well for each transducer when the words were delivered at 40 d6 above SRT. This result suggests that it is also valid to deliver the NU 6 speech test via the two types of bone vibrators.