Social innovation for developing sustainable solutions in a fisheries sector

• Published in: Environmental policy and governance Vol. 32; no. 6; pp. 504 - 519
• Main Authors: Akinsete, Ebun, Vassilopoulos, Achilleas, Secco, Laura, Pisani, Elena, Nijnik, Maria, Marini‐Govigli, Valentino, Koundouri, Phoebe, Kafetzis, Alkis
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01-12-2022
• Subjects: evaluation framework; Greece; innovative governance; Mediterranean region; natural assets; rural development
• ISSN: 1756-932X; 1756-9338
• DOI: 10.1002/eet.2022

In this paper, we explore how social innovation can provide a range of ecosystem services to local people while supporting public policies and private sector initiatives in delivering successful and innovative food distribution channels. In the Mediterranean basin, the status of commercial fish stocks is critical. In this sense, small‐scale, low‐impact fishing is a way to sustainably utilise socially innovative practices in the use of natural assets and to provide support to rural livelihoods while having minimal impacts on the marine environment. We use an innovative evaluation method, based on the integration of qualitative information with quantitative indicators, to assess social innovation initiatives and their impacts. The use of the methodology is demonstrated on the example of the project A Box of Sea, Greece. The results obtained show that this social initiative provides a novel food consumption and distribution model aiming at making low impact fishing more economically viable, and therefore achieving a triple sustainability for the sector (environmental, social, and economic). We identify third sector social innovation schemes as key tools to develop novel distribution systems supporting local communities (providing employment, fostering new networks and collaborations across fishers), while improving governance practices of the current fishing sector by creating a fairer market that protects the marine environment. Our findings provide a foundation upon which future evaluations of similar projects can build and compare. Such comparisons are crucial in determining patterns related to the innovation transfer processes.