Management of Lingual Cortex Fracture of Mandible Using Lingual Arch Bar: A Finite Element Analysis of Reduction with a Pilot Clinical Trial

• Published in: Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 979 - 986
• Main Authors: Jain, Meghana, Krishnan, Velavan, Panneerselvam, Elavenil, Raja, V. B. Krishnakumar
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New Delhi Springer India 01-12-2023; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Biomechanics; Clinical trials; Dentistry; Digital imaging; Finite element analysis; Fractures; Injuries; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; Original Article; Otorhinolaryngology; Pain; Patients; Plastic Surgery; Software; Stress analysis; Teeth; Transplants & implants; United States > US; Greenstick fracture; Finite element analysis; Erich arch bar; Lingual cortex fracture
• ISSN: 0972-8279; 0974-942X
• DOI: 10.1007/s12663-023-02031-1

Purpose
Fractures of lingual cortex are frequently left untreated leading to poor resolution of patient’s symptoms and function. Positioning an implant on same side of fracture would provide better reduction. The study aims at improving stability offered by Erich arch bar placed on lingual surface, by Finite element analysis (FEA) along with a pilot clinical trial.
Methods
Two FEA models were generated from CT scan of an individual having lingual cortex fracture: control model with labial arch bar and study model with lingual arch bar. Parameters assessed: Stress distribution (Mpa) along lines of osteosynthesis; Separation of fracture fragments (mm) across fracture line. Associated, was a clinical trial of 5 patients, managed by placing lingual arch bar. Feasibility of arch bar, post-operative pain, radiographic inter-fragmentary gap and complications were assessed clinically.
Results
Lingual positioning of arch bar demonstrated less displacement (mm) of fracture fragments compared to labial placement (0.123 vs. 0.677) upon application of masticatory load. Insignificant lingual splay and lesser degree of stress distribution (Mpa) was observed (83.1 vs. 99.3) favoring placement of arch bar on lingual side. Clinical trial correlated with outcomes of FEA, resulting in improvement of patient’s symptoms.
Conclusion
FEA and supporting clinical trial provided an effective method of reduction for lingual cortical fracture.