Choroidal vascularity index as a predictor for the development of retinopathy in diabetic patients

Background Today, limited and controversial data are available on predictive markers for diabetic retinopathy. Choroidal thickness (CT) is an unstable parameter affected by many factors. Also, previous studies had conflicting findings on choroidal thickness. In this study, we aimed to investigate th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of endocrinological investigation Vol. 47; no. 5; pp. 1175 - 1180
Main Authors: Keskin, Ç., Dilekçi, E. N. A., Üçgül, A. Y., Üçgül, R. K., Toprak, G., Cengiz, D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Cham Springer International Publishing 01-05-2024
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Today, limited and controversial data are available on predictive markers for diabetic retinopathy. Choroidal thickness (CT) is an unstable parameter affected by many factors. Also, previous studies had conflicting findings on choroidal thickness. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of choroidal vascularity index (CVI), a relatively new marker, in evaluating choroidal vascular status and its relationship with diabetic retinopathy (DR). Materials and methods A total of 124 subjects, 84 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and 40 healthy controls, were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups as follows: those without DR and those with non-proliferative DR (NPDRP). All subjects underwent enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT), and CT values were noted. To measure CVI, luminal (LA) and stromal areas of the choroidal images were binarized using Image J program. CVI was defined as the proportion of LA to total choroid area (TCA). Demographic and laboratory data of the patients were collected retrospectively. Results CVI were found to be lower in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic patients. CVI values in 3 groups were as follows: 67.9% ± 1.8 (healthy controls), 66.1% ± 2.4 (no DR), and 63.2% ± 2.6 (NPDRP) ( p  < 0.001). All groups were similar in terms of CT values ( p  = 0.296). The cut-off value for CVI in predicting retinopathy was 64.7%. Hypertension and current smoking were found to be more frequent in diabetic patients with CVI < 64.7% compared to those with CVI > 64.7%. Conclusions CVI tends to be lower in diabetic patients with or without DR compared to healthy controls. Moreover, patients with DR have a lower CVI than those without DR. CVI can be considered an early and sensitive biomarker for the onset of DR.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1720-8386
0391-4097
1720-8386
DOI:10.1007/s40618-023-02236-8