DNA double-strand break–capturing nuclear envelope tubules drive DNA repair

• Published in: Nature structural & molecular biology Vol. 31; no. 9; pp. 1319 - 1330
• Main Authors: Shokrollahi, Mitra, Stanic, Mia, Hundal, Anisha, Chan, Janet N. Y., Urman, Defne, Jordan, Chris A., Hakem, Anne, Espin, Roderic, Hao, Jun, Krishnan, Rehna, Maass, Philipp G., Dickson, Brendan C., Hande, Manoor P., Pujana, Miquel A., Hakem, Razqallah, Mekhail, Karim
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Nature Publishing Group US 01-09-2024; Nature Publishing Group
• Subjects: 631/337/1427/2122; 631/80/128/1276; 631/80/128/1653; 631/80/386/1700; Acetyltransferase; Actin; Adenosine diphosphate; Aging (artificial); Biochemistry; Biological Microscopy; Biomedical and Life Sciences; BRCA1 protein; Circadian rhythms; Cytoskeleton; Damage; Deoxyribonucleic acid; DNA; DNA damage; DNA repair; Double-strand break repair; Filaments; Kinases; Kinesin; Life Sciences; Membrane Biology; Metamorphosis; Microtubules; Nuclear capture; Nuclear pores; Nuclear structure; Period 1 protein; Poly(ADP-ribose); Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase; Protein Structure; Ribose; Structure-function relationships; Tubulin; Yeast
• ISSN: 1545-9993; 1545-9985; 1545-9985
• DOI: 10.1038/s41594-024-01286-7

Current models suggest that DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can move to the nuclear periphery for repair. It is unclear to what extent human DSBs display such repositioning. Here we show that the human nuclear envelope localizes to DSBs in a manner depending on DNA damage response (DDR) kinases and cytoplasmic microtubules acetylated by α-tubulin acetyltransferase-1 (ATAT1). These factors collaborate with the linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton complex (LINC), nuclear pore complex (NPC) protein NUP153, nuclear lamina and kinesins KIF5B and KIF13B to generate DSB-capturing nuclear envelope tubules (dsbNETs). dsbNETs are partly supported by nuclear actin filaments and the circadian factor PER1 and reversed by kinesin KIFC3. Although dsbNETs promote repair and survival, they are also co-opted during poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition to restrain BRCA1-deficient breast cancer cells and are hyper-induced in cells expressing the aging-linked lamin A mutant progerin. In summary, our results advance understanding of nuclear structure–function relationships, uncover a nuclear–cytoplasmic DDR and identify dsbNETs as critical factors in genome organization and stability.
Here the authors show that the nucleus undergoes a transient ‘metamorphosis’ within a nuclear–cytoplasmic DNA damage response linked to health and disease. Through this process, the nuclear envelope projects tubules that capture damaged DNA, mediating its repair.