THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ENGAGEMENT IN MENTORING RELATIONSHIPS AND SELF-ESTEEM AMONG AFFLUENT ADOLESCENT GIRLS

This study examined the influence of growth‐fostering mentoring relationships on the self‐esteem of adolescent female students from affluent communities. Studies have demonstrated that this population of students is susceptible to psychological distress and self‐esteem problems, due to perfectionist...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychology in the schools Vol. 53; no. 8; pp. 848 - 860
Main Authors: Liang, Belle, Lund, Terese Jean, Mousseau, Angela M. Desilva, Spencer, Renée
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-09-2016
Wiley-Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examined the influence of growth‐fostering mentoring relationships on the self‐esteem of adolescent female students from affluent communities. Studies have demonstrated that this population of students is susceptible to psychological distress and self‐esteem problems, due to perfectionistic strivings and achievement pressures. Specifically, we hypothesized that growth‐fostering mentoring relationships (e.g., with teachers and school staff) would be positively associated with self‐esteem. Moreover, we expected that this association would be mediated by engagement in purposeful activities. The authors surveyed 207 girls from two independent secondary schools and found support for the mediation hypothesis. Using an ordinary least squares regression approach, the association between growth‐fostering mentoring relationships and self‐esteem was mediated by youth engagement in purposeful activities. Implications for future research and practice in schools are discussed.
Bibliography:ArticleID:PITS21949
istex:3ABBE4AF9596919A8EF997C678A06979C6993714
ark:/67375/WNG-JHT1MQPB-7
This investigation was supported by the Laurel School's Center for Research on Girls. The authors gratefully acknowledge Lisa Damour, Caroline Erisman, Ann Klotz, and Caroline MacNichol for their critical contributions and collaboration. We are also indebted to our the students represented in this study for sharing their invaluable experiences over the course of our three‐year investigation.
ISSN:0033-3085
1520-6807
DOI:10.1002/pits.21949