Psychological Factors Predicting Sedentary Behavior of Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in Brazil

This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the psychological factors that might predict the sedentary behavior of 654 older adults from the South Region of Brazil. The participants were evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Mini-Mental State Exam; Geriatric Anxiety Sca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aging and physical activity Vol. 29; no. 2; p. 280
Main Authors: de Oliveira, Daniel Vicentini, do Nascimento, Matheus Amarante, Branco, Bráulio Henrique Magnani, de Oliveira, Rogéria Vicentini, do Nascimento Júnior, José Roberto Andrade, Freire, Gabriel Lucas Morais, Bertolini, Sônia Maria Marques Gomes
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States 01-04-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get more information
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the psychological factors that might predict the sedentary behavior of 654 older adults from the South Region of Brazil. The participants were evaluated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire; Mini-Mental State Exam; Geriatric Anxiety Scale; and the scales Geriatric Depression, Purpose in Life, Perceived Stress, Rosenberg Self-Esteem, and Satisfaction with Life. Data analysis was conducted through Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis (p < .05). No significant (p > .05) correlation was found between the sedentary behavior variables with self-esteem. Multiple regression analysis revealed that psychological variables explained 6% of the variance of sitting time during the week (R2 = .06; F = 11.546; p < .01). Depression showed a positive prediction (β = -0.10; p = .040), while life satisfaction (β = -0.16; p = .001) and purpose in life (β = -0.10; p = .026) showed negative prediction. Psychological variables predicted only 3% of the variance of sitting time during the weekend (R2 = .03; F = 5.629; p < .01), showing that life satisfaction had significant (p = .007) and negative (β = -0.13) association. Life satisfaction and purpose in life can be considered protector factors to sedentary behavior, while depression is a potentiating factor.
ISSN:1543-267X
DOI:10.1123/JAPA.2020-0051