Site of pharyngeal narrowing predicts outcome of surgery for obstructive sleep apnea

• Published in: The American review of respiratory disease Vol. 147; no. 1; p. 182
• Main Authors: Launois, S H, Feroah, T R, Campbell, W N, Issa, F G, Morrison, D, Whitelaw, W A, Isono, S, Remmers, J E
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-01-1993
• Subjects: Adult; Carbon Dioxide - physiology; Electromyography; Humans; Intercostal Muscles - physiopathology; Male; Middle Aged; Oxygen - physiology; Polysomnography; Sleep Apnea Syndromes - physiopathology; Tongue - physiopathology
• ISSN: 0003-0805
• DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.1.182

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP), an operation that enlarges the pharyngeal airway at the level of the soft palate, improves respiratory status during sleep in only 50% of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This poor outcome suggests that narrowing of the pharyngeal airway at nonpalatal sites contributes to the obstructive process in many patients with OSA. We have used a novel endoscopic method to identify regions of the passive pharyngeal airway most susceptible to narrowing or complete closure. In order to test the hypothesis that narrowing of the passive airway at the nasopharynx predicts a favorable surgical outcome, we have preoperatively assessed the local mechanics of the passive pharyngeal airway in 18 patients with OSA undergoing UPPP. The patient population was prospectively divided into two groups: an exclusively nasopharyngeal (ENP) group, consisting of patients exhibiting narrowing only in the nasopharynx, and a not exclusively nasopharyngeal (NENP) group, consisting of patients having at least one site of narrowing outside the nasopharynx. The frequency of respiratory disturbances and arousals and the cumulative time in apnea-hypopnea were significantly reduced after surgery for the ENP group, but not for the NENP group. Improvement rate for the ENP group (86%) exceeded that for the NENP group (18%) (p < 0.01). These differences became even greater when selection criteria for the ENP group were made more restrictive (i.e., restricted to the velopharynx) or more liberal (i.e., including secondary narrowing of the oropharynx). Our results show that evaluation of passive pharyngeal mechanics identifies patients with OSA likely to improve after UPPP.