Study of the ditallowdimethylammonium chloride interaction with cellulose

From a theoretical standpoint, the driving force for the deposition of ditallowdimethylammonium chloride (“DTDMAC” or “quat”) onto cotton must be distinguished from the nature of its interaction with cellulose. We found that the driving force is purely hydrophobic. Due to its strong hydrophobicity,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society Vol. 72; no. 1; pp. 137 - 143
Main Author: Crutzen, A.M
Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer‐Verlag 1995
Springer
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:From a theoretical standpoint, the driving force for the deposition of ditallowdimethylammonium chloride (“DTDMAC” or “quat”) onto cotton must be distinguished from the nature of its interaction with cellulose. We found that the driving force is purely hydrophobic. Due to its strong hydrophobicity, DTDMAC is expelled out of the aqueous rinse bath and deposits onto available surfaces. Besides its tendency not to leave the cotton surface and return to solution (hydrophobic effect), it binds to cellulose by weak London dispersion forces. A strong Coulombic interaction occurs only when a negative charge is present. Consequently, the strong affinity of DTDMAC for cellulose mainly results from the large specific surface area of the fiber; negative charges play a secondary role. Much experimental evidence supports the hydrophobic nature of DTDMAC adsorption onto cellulose. DTDMAC deposits onto charge‐free surfaces; its deposition is mainly governed by the available surface area, not by the surface nature. The hydrophobic nature of the interaction of DTDMAC with cotton may be displayed and distinguished from electrostatic binding. Structural effects demonstrate the correlation between hydrophobicity, deposition and the softening power of quaternaries. This model proposes a single mechanism to account for the deposition of DTDMAC onto cotton and synthetics. It is consistent with experimental facts that remain unexplained by the electrostatic model.
Bibliography:This work was presented at the 84th AOCS Annual Meeting in 1993 in Anaheim, California.
ISSN:0003-021X
1558-9331
DOI:10.1007/BF02635791