Effects of 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor agonists and antagonists on responding for a conditioned reinforcer and its enhancement by methylphenidate

Objectives These experiments examined the effects of selective 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptor ligands on responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CRf). Effects of these ligands were measured under basal conditions and following elevated dopamine (DA) activity produced by the DA reuptake inhi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopharmacology Vol. 234; no. 5; pp. 889 - 902
Main Authors: Fletcher, Paul J., Zeeb, Fiona D., Browne, Caleb J., Higgins, Guy A., Soko, Ashlie D.
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-03-2017
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objectives These experiments examined the effects of selective 5-HT 1A , 5-HT 2A and 5-HT 2C receptor ligands on responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CRf). Effects of these ligands were measured under basal conditions and following elevated dopamine (DA) activity produced by the DA reuptake inhibitor methylphenidate. Methods Water-restricted rats learned to associate a conditioned stimulus (CS) with water in operant chambers. Subsequently, two response levers were made available; responding on one lever delivered the CS (now a CRf), while responding on the second lever had no consequences. The effects of agonist and antagonists of 5-HT 1A (8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT) and N -[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]- N -2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY100635)), 5-HT 2A (DOI and M100907) and 5-HT 2C (Ro60-0175 and SB242084) receptors on responding were examined alone, as well as in the presence of methylphenidate. Results Responding for a CRf was reduced by the agonists 8-OH-DPAT, DOI and Ro60-0175. 8-OH-DPAT also reduced responding for water and seemed to impair responding in a non-specific fashion. None of the receptor antagonists affected responding. Methylphenidate dose-dependently enhanced responding for a CRf, and this was attenuated by DOI and Ro60-0175. Conversely, the 5-HT 2C receptor antagonist SB242084 potentiated the effect of methylphenidate. Conclusions No evidence was found for a behaviourally selective effect of 5-HT 1A receptor ligands on responding for a CRf. Activation of 5-HT 2A receptors selectively inhibits responding for a CRf. 5-HT 2C receptor ligands exerted bidirectional modulation of responding for a CRf, especially when DA activity was increased. This indicates that 5-HT 2C receptor activity is an important modulator of DA-dependent reward-related behaviours.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0033-3158
1432-2072
DOI:10.1007/s00213-017-4529-5