Comparison between K-means and Self-Organizing Maps algorithms used for diagnosis spinal column patients

Back pain is a problem that affects at least 90% of the human population during their lifetimes, and it is one of the main causes of absence from work. Despite the large number of medical cases, there is insufficient research in this field, due in part to the necessity of administering multiple medi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Informatics in medicine unlocked Vol. 16; p. 100206
Main Authors: Melo Riveros, Nicolas Andres, Cardenas Espitia, Bayron Alexis, Aparicio Pico, Lilia Edith
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2019
Elsevier
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Back pain is a problem that affects at least 90% of the human population during their lifetimes, and it is one of the main causes of absence from work. Despite the large number of medical cases, there is insufficient research in this field, due in part to the necessity of administering multiple medical exams to patients with vertebral problems for accurate diagnosis. In addition, the cause of back pain may be benign, and heal without treatment. In this study, two artificial intelligence algorithms were employed to classify patients with spinal problems. The algorithms used were K-means and Self Organizing Maps (SOM). With these techniques, two models were obtained that provided a generalization error of less than 10%. The models were compared based on metrics that enable the measurement of classifier performance, including the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and negative predictive value (NPV), as well as Cohen's Kappa index to evaluate concordance. It was found that the model trained with SOM outperformed the model trained with K-means, with improved detection of patients having vertebral problems. Additionally, it was found that the SOM and K-means models yielded similar precision as compared with models obtained with different algorithms reported elsewhere. The values yielded were in agreement with those of expert orthopedic physicians.
ISSN:2352-9148
2352-9148
DOI:10.1016/j.imu.2019.100206