Development, Resilience Engineering, Degeneracy, and Cognitive Practices
Drawing on a range of literature, I introduce two new concepts for understanding and exploring distributed cognition: resilience engineering and degeneracy. By re-examining Ed Hutchins’ ( 1995 ) ethnographic study of the navigation team I show how a focus on the developmental acquisition of cognitiv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of philosophy and psychology Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 645 - 664 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dordrecht
Springer Netherlands
01-09-2022
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Drawing on a range of literature, I introduce two new concepts for understanding and exploring distributed cognition: resilience engineering and degeneracy. By re-examining Ed Hutchins’ (
1995
) ethnographic study of the navigation team I show how a focus on the developmental acquisition of cognitive practices can draw out several crucial insights that have been overlooked. Firstly, that the way in which agents learn and acquire cognitive practices enables a form of
resilience engineering
: the process by which the system is able to overcome and adapt to errors and the vagaries of nature. Secondly, that the best way to engineer a resilient system is through promoting
degeneracy
– how differing structures produce the same function – at the level of cognitive practices. These two features show that focusing on cognitive practices and developmental trajectories is important for both greater explanatory leverage; and is also useful in regard to the practicalities of designing real-world cognitive systems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1878-5158 1878-5166 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s13164-021-00550-9 |