Comparison of titanium and Robinson stainless steel stapes piston prostheses

• Published in: Otology & neurotology Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 874 - 877
• Main Authors: Lippy, William H, Burkey, John M, Schuring, Arnold G, Berenholz, Leonard P
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 01-09-2005
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Auditory Threshold; Ear Ossicles - surgery; Female; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Prostheses and Implants; Retrospective Studies; Stainless Steel; Stapes Surgery - methods; Titanium
• ISSN: 1531-7129
• DOI: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185070.27705.26

Although stainless steel stapes prostheses have generally been considered magnetic resonance imaging safe, there is concern that this may change with the development of more powerful imaging systems. The objective of the study was to determine whether a titanium piston stapes prosthesis would be audiometrically and surgically equivalent to a Robinson stainless steel piston for stapedectomy.
Retrospective chart review.
Private otology practice.
In all, 50 patients underwent stapedectomy with a Gyrus titanium piston prosthesis. These patients were matched on the basis of age and preoperative bone-conduction scores with patients who underwent stapedectomy with a Robinson stainless steel piston prosthesis.
Audiometric results are analyzed, and surgical complications noted.
There was no significant difference between groups in hearing improvement or postoperative air-bone gap. The mean four-frequency hearing improvement was 27.7 dB for the stainless steel group and 27.8 dB for the titanium group. The mean postoperative air-bone gap was 2.65 dB for the stainless steel group and 2.60 for the titanium group. Neither group had a surgical complication.
The titanium stapes prosthesis is a good alternative to a stainless steel prosthesis.