Comparative role of Interface in reinforcing mechanisms of Nano silica modified by Silanes and liquid rubber in SBR composites

• Published in: Journal of polymer research Vol. 23; no. 9; p. 1
• Main Authors: Hosseini, Seyed Mostaffa, Torbati-Fard, Nafise, Kiyani, Hossein, Razzaghi-Kashani, Mehdi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Netherlands 01-09-2016; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Characterization and Evaluation of Materials; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Industrial Chemistry/Chemical Engineering; Original Paper; Polymer Sciences; Surface modification; Nano composites; Rubber; Nano silica; Interfacial interactions
• ISSN: 1022-9760; 1572-8935
• DOI: 10.1007/s10965-016-1096-0

The objective of the present study is to discuss the role of silica-rubber interfacial interactions on vulcanization kinetics, morphology, mechanical and viscoelastic behavior of silica filled styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) composites. Three types of modifiers, namely mono- and bi-functional silanes as well as hydroxyl-terminated poly butadiene (HTPB) liquid rubber were grafted to silica surface, and composites prepared by these fillers were characterized. Results showed that modified silica, especially grafted by bi-functional silane and liquid rubber, accelerated vulcanization reactions, while pristine silica slowed down vulcanization kinetics of SBR. Morphological studies indicated that all modifications improved dispersion of silica, but HTPB-grafted silica was dispersed to a greater extent in SBR. The observed differences in mechanical and dynamic-mechanical properties of vulcanizates were correlated to the significant differences in silica-rubber and silica-silica interactions. Type of interfacial interactions, i.e. rigid covalent bonds in the bi-functional silane, flexible polymeric bonds in the liquid rubber, and weak energetic bonds in the mono-functional silane, could explain the observed differences. Although all modifications reduced filler networking, rigid covalent bonding by bi-functional silane significantly improved mechanical properties and stabilized the filler network. The mono-functional silane lacks these mechanisms. The soft and flexible interphase of HTPB could create bonds and transfer stresses between the rubber matrix and silica to some extent, however it could not improve the mechanical properties and reduce the Payne effect as much as the bi-functional silane did.