Reproductive apparatus and male accessory structures in two batrachoid species (Teleostei, Batrachoididae)
The morphology of the genital apparatus of two batrachoid species, Opsanus tau and Porichthys notatus, was studied. The anatomical organization of the female reproductive apparatus is similar in both species but differences are observed in the rhythm of gametogenesis with individual oocyte productio...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of fish biology Vol. 58; no. 6; pp. 1557 - 1569 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01-06-2001
Blackwell |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The morphology of the genital apparatus of two batrachoid species, Opsanus tau and Porichthys notatus, was studied. The anatomical organization of the female reproductive apparatus is similar in both species but differences are observed in the rhythm of gametogenesis with individual oocyte production asynchronous in O. tau and group synchronous in P. notatus. The male reproductive apparatus is similarly organized in the two species, with both showing enlongated testes with an efferent duct system, two main testicular ducts, a common sperm duct, and a pair of multi‐channel accessory structures. The sperm transport system consisting of the efferent duct system, main testicular ducts, and sperm duct is more developed in P. notatus and only in this species does it secrete sialoglycoproteins. Male accessory organs also secrete sialoglycoprotein in both species, but they appear more developed in O. tau. Intraspecific variability in development of accessory structures and mucin secretion was also observed between the two male morphs of P. notatus. Type I males, which build nests and perform parental care to eggs and fry, have larger accessory organs and more abundant secretion than type II males, which adopt opportunistic spawning tactics. The possible role played by mucins as components of the seminal fluid, in both species, and their inter‐and intraspecific variability are discussed in the light of the reproductive biology and the presence of alternative male mating tactics. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | istex:4BECE8788CA4C7F4EC4885D4C73881B0012AF591 ArticleID:JFB1557 ark:/67375/WNG-W1817F83-0 |
ISSN: | 0022-1112 1095-8649 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02312.x |