ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Growth Disturbances-Risk of Fetal Growth Restriction

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 16; no. 5; pp. S116 - S125
• Main Authors: Shipp, Thomas D., Zelop, Carolyn M., Maturen, Katherine E., Deshmukh, Sandeep Prakash, Dudiak, Kika M., Henrichsen, Tara L., Oliver, Edward R., Poder, Liina, Sadowski, Elizabeth A., Simpson, Lynn, Weber, Therese M., Winter, Tom, Glanc, Phyllis
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-05-2019
• Subjects: Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; AUC; Biophysical profile; Doppler velocimetry; Fetal growth restriction; Fetal well-being; Gestational age; Ultrasound; Fetal well-being; Fetal growth restriction; Doppler velocimetry; Appropriate Use Criteria; Biophysical profile; Ultrasound; Appropriateness Criteria; Gestational age; AUC
• ISSN: 1546-1440; 1558-349X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.009

Fetal growth restriction, or an estimated fetal weight of less than the 10th percentile, is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Optimizing management for obtaining the most favorable outcome for mother and fetus is largely based on detailed ultrasound findings. Identifying and performing those ultrasound procedures that are most associated with adverse outcome is necessary for proper patient management. Transabdominal ultrasound is the mainstay of initial management and assessment of fetal growth. For those fetuses that are identified as small for gestational age, assessment of fetal well-being with biophysical profile and Doppler velocimetry provide vital information for differentiating those fetuses that may be compromised and may require delivery and those that are well compensated. Delivery of the pregnancy is primarily based upon the gestational age of the pregnancy and the ultrasound findings.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.