ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Cough

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Radiology Vol. 18; no. 11; pp. S305 - S319
• Main Authors: Kuzniewski, Christopher T., Kizhner, Oskar, Donnelly, Edwin F., Henry, Travis S., Amin, Alpesh N., Kandathil, Asha, Kelly, Aine Marie, Laroia, Archana T., Lee, Elizabeth, Martin, Maria D., Morris, Michael F., Raptis, Constantine A., Sirajuddin, Arlene, Wu, Carol C., Kanne, Jeffrey P.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Elsevier Inc 01-11-2021
• Subjects: Appropriate Use Criteria; Appropriateness Criteria; AUC; Chest radiograph; Chronic cough; Chronic Disease; Cough - diagnostic imaging; Cough - etiology; Diagnostic Imaging; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Persistent cough; Refractory cough; Societies, Medical; United States; United States; Chest radiograph; CT; Refractory cough; Chronic cough; Appropriate Use Criteria; Persistent cough; Appropriateness Criteria; AUC
• ISSN: 1546-1440; 1558-349X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.007

Chronic cough is defined by a duration lasting at least 8 weeks. The most common causes of chronic cough include smoking-related lung disease, upper airway cough syndrome, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis. The etiology of chronic cough in some patients may be difficult to localize to an isolated source and is often multifactorial. The complex pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and variable manifestations of chronic cough underscore the challenges faced by clinicians in the evaluation and management of these patients. Imaging plays a role in the initial evaluation, although there is a lack of high-quality evidence guiding which modalities are useful and at what point in time the clinical evaluation should be performed.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.