Analysis of effective spatial range of oral vaccination against classical swine fever for wild boar

• Published in: Preventive veterinary medicine Vol. 221; p. 106080
• Main Authors: Hayama, Yoko, Sawai, Kotaro, Murato, Yoshinori, Yamaguchi, Emi, Kondo, Sonoko, Yamamoto, Takehisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Netherlands 01-12-2023
• Subjects: Animals; Animals, Wild; Classical Swine Fever - epidemiology; Classical Swine Fever - prevention & control; Classical Swine Fever Virus; Disease Susceptibility - veterinary; Sus scrofa; Swine; Swine Diseases; Vaccination - methods; Vaccination - veterinary; Vaccines, Attenuated; Viral Vaccines; Oral vaccine; Classical swine fever; Japan; Wild boar
• ISSN: 0167-5877; 1873-1716
• DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106080

Classical swine fever (CSF) re-emerged in Gifu Prefecture, central Japan, in September 2018 and is currently widespread in wild boar populations. Due to its widespread in wild boars, an oral mass vaccination strategy was initiated in March 2019, employing a commercial bait vaccine that is a live attenuated vaccine. To enhance the effectiveness of oral vaccination, it is crucial to determine the vaccine's effective spatial range. This understanding is essential for devising a comprehensive vaccination strategy, which should also include a preliminary investigation of wild boar habitats before vaccination. This study aimed to estimate the effective range of oral vaccination for wild boars against CSF by analyzing the geographical relationship between immune wild boars and vaccination points within the vaccination areas in Gifu Prefecture. This study utilized oral vaccination data from April 2021 to March 2022. The prevalence of CSF infections in wild boars remained below 5% in this period, suggesting limited disease transmission and immune wild boars were considered to be induced by the effect of vaccination. Two vaccination campaigns were conducted during this period, with almost 2000 vaccination points each. To investigate the factors associated with the intensity (i.e., density) of immune wild boar, the nearest distances to a vaccination point and to a susceptible wild boar were evaluated as explanatory variables. The Rhohat procedure and point process model were utilized to analyze the relationship between the intensity of immune wild boars and the explanatory variables. The point process model revealed a significant decrease in the intensity of immune wild boars when the distance from the nearest vaccination point exceeded 500 m, indicating that the effective spatial range of bait vaccination is within 500 m of the vaccination point. Although the distance to the nearest susceptible animal did not show significance in the model, Rhohat plots indicated that the intensity of immune wild boars decreased at distances greater than 1200 m from the nearest susceptible wild boar. This finding highlights the importance of investigating susceptible wild boar populations within a range of at least 1200 m from a vaccination point before implementation. The present study revealed the effective range of oral vaccination for wild boars against CSF and indicated the importance of investigating susceptible wild boar habitats around vaccination points before the implementation of vaccination. These findings may help improve the effectiveness of oral vaccinations.