Comparing methanol and glycerol as carbon sources for mainstream partial denitrification/anammox in an IFAS process

• Published in: Water environment research Vol. 96; no. 4; pp. e11017 - n/a
• Main Authors: Bachmann, Megan, Parsons, Mike, Klaus, Stephanie, Kurt, Halil, Chandran, Kartik, Stockard, Daniel, Wells, George, De Clippeleir, Haydee, Bott, Charles
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01-04-2024
• Subjects: Activated sludge; Ammonia; Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria; Anaerobic bacteria; anammox; Anoxia; Bacteria; Bioreactors; Carbon; Carbon sources; Configurations; Control systems; Denitrification; Effluents; Glycerol; IFAS; Influents; mainstream; Methanol; Nitrogen compounds; Nitrogen removal; partial denitrification; Planctomycetota; Reactors; Sludge; Wastewater treatment; Water treatment; mainstream; methanol; partial denitrification; IFAS; anammox; glycerol
• ISSN: 1061-4303; 1554-7531
• DOI: 10.1002/wer.11017

This study explored the implementation of mainstream partial denitrification with anammox (PdNA) in the second anoxic zone of a wastewater treatment process in an integrated fixed film activated sludge (IFAS) configuration. A pilot study was conducted to compare the use of methanol and glycerol as external carbon sources for an IFAS PdNA startup, with a goal to optimize nitrogen removal while minimizing carbon usage. The study also investigated the establishment of anammox bacteria on virgin carriers in IFAS reactors without the use of seeding, and it is the first IFAS PdNA startup to use methanol as an external carbon source. The establishment of anammox bacteria was confirmed in both reactors 102 days after startup. Although the glycerol‐fed reactor achieved a higher steady‐state maximum ammonia removal rate because of anammox bacteria (1.6 ± 0.3 g/m2/day) in comparison with the methanol‐fed reactor (1.2 ± 0.2 g/m2/day), both the glycerol‐ and methanol‐fed reactors achieved similar average in situ ammonia removal rates of 0.39 ± 0.2 g/m2/day and 0.40 ± 0.2 g/m2/day, respectively. Additionally, when the upstream ammonia versus NOx (AvN) control system maintained an ideal ratio of 0.40–0.50 g/g, the methanol‐fed reactor attained a lower average effluent TIN concentration (3.50 ± 1.2 mg/L) than the glycerol‐fed reactor (4.43 ± 1.6 mg/L), which was prone to elevated nitrite concentrations in the effluent. Overall, this research highlights the potential for PdNA in IFAS configurations as an efficient and cost‐saving method for wastewater treatment, with methanol as a viable carbon source for the establishment of anammox bacteria.
Practitioner Points
Methanol is an effective external carbon source for an anammox startup that avoids the need for costly alternative carbon sources.
The methanol‐fed reactor demonstrated higher TIN removal compared with the glycerol‐fed reactor because of less overproduction of nitrite.
Anammox bacteria was established in an IFAS reactor without seeding and used internally stored carbon to reduce external carbon addition.
Controlling the influent ammonia versus NOx (AvN) ratio between 0.40 and 0.50 g/g allowed for low and stable TIN effluent conditions.
This pilot studied mainstream PdNA in an IFAS configuration and compared the use of methanol and glycerol for partial denitrification. The results indicate that IFAS PdNA is an effective method for optimizing nitrogen removal while minimizing carbon usage, and thinner biofilms allowed the methanol‐fed reactor to outcompete glycerol in TIN removal.