An empirical test of forgiveness motives' effects on employees' health and well-being

Two critical-incident studies were conducted to determine what motivates employees to forgive (or reconcile) with coworkers who offend them. Data from the first study's exploratory factor analysis revealed five types of motives for forgiveness: apology, moral, religious, relationship, and lack...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of occupational health psychology Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 330 - 340
Main Authors: Cox, Susie S, Bennett, Rebecca J, Tripp, Thomas M, Aquino, Karl
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: United States Educational Publishing Foundation 01-07-2012
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Two critical-incident studies were conducted to determine what motivates employees to forgive (or reconcile) with coworkers who offend them. Data from the first study's exploratory factor analysis revealed five types of motives for forgiveness: apology, moral, religious, relationship, and lack of alternatives. Data from the second study on a different sample confirmed the five-factor structure, and structural equation modeling demonstrated differential relationships between the five motives and the outcome variables, stress and health. Individuals who claimed to have forgiven because they believed they had no other alternatives, or who forgave because they believed a higher power (religious) required it, were more likely to report greater stress and poorer health. Positive outcomes of forgiveness were discovered for those employees who forgave because they believed it was the right (moral) thing to do. Those who forgave for moral reasons reported less stress than those who forgave because they believed they had no other choice or because a higher power demanded it. Forgiving for relationship and apology reasons was not significantly related to either stress or general health. Future research directions are discussed.
AbstractList Two critical-incident studies were conducted to determine what motivates employees to forgive (or reconcile) with coworkers who offend them. Data from the first study's exploratory factor analysis revealed five types of motives for forgiveness: apology, moral, religious, relationship, and lack of alternatives. Data from the second study on a different sample confirmed the five-factor structure, and structural equation modeling demonstrated differential relationships between the five motives and the outcome variables, stress and health. Individuals who claimed to have forgiven because they believed they had no other alternatives, or who forgave because they believed a higher power (religious) required it, were more likely to report greater stress and poorer health. Positive outcomes of forgiveness were discovered for those employees who forgave because they believed it was the right (moral) thing to do. Those who forgave for moral reasons reported less stress than those who forgave because they believed they had no other choice or because a higher power demanded it. Forgiving for relationship and apology reasons was not significantly related to either stress or general health. Future research directions are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)
Two critical-incident studies were conducted to determine what motivates employees to forgive (or reconcile) with coworkers who offend them. Data from the first study's exploratory factor analysis revealed five types of motives for forgiveness: apology, moral, religious, relationship, and lack of alternatives. Data from the second study on a different sample confirmed the five-factor structure, and structural equation modeling demonstrated differential relationships between the five motives and the outcome variables, stress and health. Individuals who claimed to have forgiven because they believed they had no other alternatives, or who forgave because they believed a higher power (religious) required it, were more likely to report greater stress and poorer health. Positive outcomes of forgiveness were discovered for those employees who forgave because they believed it was the right (moral) thing to do. Those who forgave for moral reasons reported less stress than those who forgave because they believed they had no other choice or because a higher power demanded it. Forgiving for relationship and apology reasons was not significantly related to either stress or general health. Future research directions are discussed.
Author Aquino, Karl
Tripp, Thomas M
Bennett, Rebecca J
Cox, Susie S
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Susie S
  surname: Cox
  fullname: Cox, Susie S
  email: scox@mcneese.edu
  organization: Department of Management, Marketing, and Business Administration, McNeese State University, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA. scox@mcneese.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rebecca J
  surname: Bennett
  fullname: Bennett, Rebecca J
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Thomas M
  surname: Tripp
  fullname: Tripp, Thomas M
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Karl
  surname: Aquino
  fullname: Aquino, Karl
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22642409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdkEtPwzAQhC1URB8g8QuQJQ5wCfiRxPGxqnhJlbjQc-TG6zZVYhc7AfXf40LbA6cdrb6dHc0YDayzgNA1JQ-UcPGoCGEFp-kZGlHJZUI5EYOoiciTQspiiMYhbAghPBX0Ag0Zy1OWEjlCi6nF0G5rX1eqwR2EDjuDjfOr-gsshIBb10UZ7jAYA1UXsPu9aNwO9ts1qKZbY2U1_oamSZZQ29UlOjeqCXB1mBO0eH76mL0m8_eXt9l0nlSc0i4pjDQk1wVQlXIlVJ4JLjhnJC20qCqd5akoKBNiyaFQkuY6ZxK00XmagQHgE3T_57v17rOP4cu2DlWMoSy4PpSUMM4kp4JF9PYfunG9tzFdpKgQGdv_PhlW3oXgwZRbX7fK7yJU7qsuj1VH9OZg2C9b0Cfw2C3_AX4qeMA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_52547_qaiie_7_3_141
crossref_primary_10_1177_2158244020902084
crossref_primary_10_1002_nop2_729
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10490_023_09916_2
crossref_primary_10_3928_02793695_20231018_03
crossref_primary_10_5465_19416520_2016_1120956
crossref_primary_10_1080_1359432X_2017_1392940
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jvb_2017_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1111_beer_12570
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10943_022_01710_6
crossref_primary_10_4102_sajip_v46i0_1733
crossref_primary_10_4236_health_2014_68086
crossref_primary_10_1002_ejsp_2929
crossref_primary_10_5964_ijpr_4625
crossref_primary_10_1002_job_2632
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbusres_2021_09_040
crossref_primary_10_1002_job_2376
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2024_1256402
crossref_primary_10_1017_jmo_2016_18
crossref_primary_10_1080_19416520_2016_1120956
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11089_023_01081_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_leaqua_2015_06_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_obhdp_2014_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1002_pits_23010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10551_015_2750_x
crossref_primary_10_5812_semj_62299
crossref_primary_10_5964_pch_v8i1_313
crossref_primary_10_1080_13607863_2017_1399346
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2012, American Psychological Association
Copyright_xml – notice: 2012, American Psychological Association
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7RZ
PSYQQ
7X8
DOI 10.1037/a0028314
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
APA PsycArticles®
ProQuest One Psychology
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
ProQuest One Psychology
PsycARTICLES
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest One Psychology
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1939-1307
EndPage 340
ExternalDocumentID 10_1037_a0028314
22642409
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
354
5GY
5VS
7RZ
8VB
AAWTL
ABIVO
ABNCP
ACHQT
ACPQG
AEHFB
AEMOZ
AI.
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AWKKM
AZXWR
CGNQK
CGR
CS3
CUY
CVF
DU5
EBR
EBU
ECM
EIF
EMK
EPA
F3I
F5P
FTD
HVGLF
HZ~
ISO
K1G
LW5
NPM
O9-
OPA
OVD
P2P
QWB
ROL
SES
SPA
TEORI
TH9
TN5
UHS
VH1
ZL0
ZPI
AAYXX
CITATION
PSYQQ
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-8f9f06d8e1a43a7a65737332048d7ccd564781277b3e8a916d629edfd645efee3
ISSN 1076-8998
IngestDate Sun May 05 09:17:59 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 19:56:33 EDT 2024
Fri Aug 23 01:17:04 EDT 2024
Thu May 23 23:18:09 EDT 2024
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c311t-8f9f06d8e1a43a7a65737332048d7ccd564781277b3e8a916d629edfd645efee3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 22642409
PQID 1017752737
PQPubID 60993
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1023293172
proquest_journals_1017752737
crossref_primary_10_1037_a0028314
pubmed_primary_22642409
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2012-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2012-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2012
  text: 2012-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of occupational health psychology
PublicationTitleAlternate J Occup Health Psychol
PublicationYear 2012
Publisher Educational Publishing Foundation
Publisher_xml – name: Educational Publishing Foundation
SSID ssj0003471
Score 2.233137
Snippet Two critical-incident studies were conducted to determine what motivates employees to forgive (or reconcile) with coworkers who offend them. Data from the...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 330
SubjectTerms Adaptation, Psychological
Adult
Employee Attitudes
Employment - psychology
Female
Forgiveness
Health
Health Status
Human
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Male
Motivation
Stress
Well Being
Title An empirical test of forgiveness motives' effects on employees' health and well-being
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22642409
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1017752737
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1023293172
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3Ni9QwFA_uCuJF_HZ1lQjCHqS47Wua5jjqLHtY18N2YG-lbRIZ0HZ0pv79vnw1HRZhPXgpJW1SyPv1vZf3Sci7lHHJsrJLeCkZHlA0S0qJh5VWo7ZeNkLqzth0z6_45XX5eZkvozEnjv1XSuMY0tpkzv4DtadFcQDvkeZ4Rarj9VZ0X_Tv1Y_N2lX-QD3SevpRM_0W2JqJvvutbPDEFMxh59jOv3bcJUdav4Kx7SWtCgLupho7zMsU-4mbwFUne71vZ3w1btcqWls_2qSg3YzM0UtVITfbxBCmaLVd_BzXtl-4SWT7PrdapDHCFYWO47QCRIIClO-xYj6DHMz4KnjnjRPR4Co83eD-rn5AY_svudTU_QLbl1_rs9XFRV0tr6sDcjdD3gQh5cgLb0BhHWoUA_8Q1trXWv5yFLEqSfWQPPBEoAsHgkfkjuofk3tffLTEE7Ja9HTCAjVYoIOmMyxQj4UT6pFABzvDIeGEOnJSxAGNOHhKVmfL6tN54ttoJB2k6S4ptdCnhSxV2uTQ8KZgHDiAqdgseddJZtONM85bUPh3poUsMqGklkXOlFYKnpHDfujVC0KLVp2KHA8R0DS5ymQLrGzzrBOdZoLp7Ii8DdtUb1y1lNpGOQCvw1YekeOwf7X_b7Ym0JBzUwuQ4xLTY-R0xn3V9GoYzTuo_QvUd_Ezz92-Tx8x6eCom4qXt5j9ityPiDwmh7tfo3pNDrZyfGOx8Ad4c31n
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27933,27934
linkProvider American Psychological Association
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An+empirical+test+of+forgiveness+motives%27+effects+on+employees%27+health+and+well-being&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+occupational+health+psychology&rft.au=Cox%2C+Susie+S&rft.au=Bennett%2C+Rebecca+J&rft.au=Tripp%2C+Thomas+M&rft.au=Aquino%2C+Karl&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.eissn=1939-1307&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=330&rft.epage=340&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037%2Fa0028314&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1076-8998&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1076-8998&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1076-8998&client=summon