Prognostic criteria for the management of temporomandibular disorders using arthrocentesis with normal saline and arthrocentesis with normal saline and platelet-rich plasma

• Published in: Journal of medicine and life Vol. 15; no. 5; pp. 698 - 704
• Main Authors: Ansar, Ahmad Syed, Munna, Khan, Iqbal, Asif, Mohammad, Faisal, Naved, Alam, Shamimul, Hasan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Bucharest Carol Daila University Foundation 01-05-2022; Carol Davila University Press
• Subjects: Anti-inflammatory agents; Arthritis; Blood platelets; Mouth; Original; Pain; Patients; Physical therapy; Plasma; Temporomandibular joint disorders
• ISSN: 1844-122X; 1844-3117
• DOI: 10.25122/jml-2021-0240

Temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) are ailments affecting the jaws and allied structures, resulting in many pathologies (TMJ hypermobility, internal disc derangement, bone changes, degenerative disorders, and ankylosis). Pain, clicking or crepitus, restricted range of motion, deranged jaw function, and deflected or deviated mouth opening and closing are the commonly observed manifestations in TMDs. Internal derangement refers to an aberrant relation of the articular disc to the condyle and fossa, respectively. Conventional therapies highlight the role of non-invasive conservative treatment strategies, namely joint unloading, anti-inflammatory drugs, and physiotherapy. Current literature has emphasized the use of corticosteroids and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as treatment strategies in TMDs. This study aimed to evaluate whether intra-articular injection of PRP after normal saline lavage in TMJ minimizes the symptoms of TMDs, as compared to injection of normal saline. Thirty patients with TMD according to research diagnostic criteria (RDC) were selected. One group received arthrocentesis with normal saline, and the other group received arthrocentesis with PRP injection. The patients were assessed for pain, maximum inter-incisal mouth opening, bite force, and TMJ sounds. TMDs treated by PRP injection had slightly better results. More studies are required to substantiate the outcome. Injections of PRP were more effective in reducing the symptoms than arthrocentesis with normal saline.