Tomotherapy PET-guided dose escalation A dosimetric feasibility study for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma

Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT). Material and methods We selected 12 patients with MPM. Thr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Vol. 192; no. 2; pp. 102 - 108
Main Authors: Maggio, Angelo, Cutaia, Claudia, Di Dia, Amalia, Bresciani, Sara, Miranti, Anna, Poli, Matteo, Mastro, Elena Del, Garibaldi, Elisabetta, Gabriele, Pietro, Stasi, Michele
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01-02-2016
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT). Material and methods We selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV 1 ) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV 2 ). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV 1 and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV 2 , in 25 fractions. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans. Results For all plans, the 95 % PTVs received at least 95 % of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was < 8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment ( p  > 0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V 20 , V 30 , and V 40 DVHs of the lung ( p  < 0.0003) and with the lung mean dose ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs.
AbstractList The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT).AIMThe aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT).We selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV1) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV2). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV1 and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV2, in 25 fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans.MATERIAL AND METHODSWe selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV1) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV2). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV1 and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV2, in 25 fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans.For all plans, the 95 % PTVs received at least 95 % of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was < 8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment (p > 0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V20, V30, and V40 DVHs of the lung (p < 0.0003) and with the lung mean dose (p < 0.0001).RESULTSFor all plans, the 95 % PTVs received at least 95 % of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was < 8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment (p > 0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V20, V30, and V40 DVHs of the lung (p < 0.0003) and with the lung mean dose (p < 0.0001).The results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs.CONCLUSIONThe results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs.
The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT). We selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV1) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV2). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV1 and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV2, in 25 fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans. For all plans, the 95 % PTVs received at least 95 % of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was < 8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment (p > 0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V20, V30, and V40 DVHs of the lung (p < 0.0003) and with the lung mean dose (p < 0.0001). The results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs.
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT). Material and methods We selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV^sub 1^) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV^sub 2^). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV^sub 1^ and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV^sub 2^, in 25 fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans. Results For all plans, the 95% PTVs received at least 95% of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was <8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment (p>0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V^sub 20^, V^sub 30^, and V^sub 40^ DVHs of the lung (p<0.0003) and with the lung mean dose (p<0.0001). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Erratum DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0920-5
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is possible using helical tomotherapy (HT). Material and methods We selected 12 patients with MPM. Three planning strategies were investigated. In the first strategy (standard treatment), treated comprised a prescribed median dose to the planning target volume (PTV) boost (PTV 1 ) of 64.5 Gy (range: 56 Gy/28 fractions to 66 Gy/30 fractions) and 51 Gy (range: 50.4 Gy/28 fractions to 54 Gy/30 fractions) to the pleura PTV (PTV 2 ). Thereafter, for each patient, two dose escalation plans were generated prescribing 62.5 and 70 Gy (2.5 and 2.8 Gy/fraction, respectively) to the PTV 1 and 56 Gy (2.24 Gy/fraction) to the PTV 2 , in 25 fractions. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) constraints and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) calculations were used to evaluate the differences between the plans. Results For all plans, the 95 % PTVs received at least 95 % of the prescribed dose. For all patients, it was possible to perform the dose escalation in accordance with the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints for organs at risk (OARs). The average contralateral lung dose was < 8 Gy. NTCP values for OARs did not increase significantly compared with the standard treatment ( p  > 0.05), except for the ipsilateral lung. For all plans, the lung volume ratio was strongly correlated with the V 20 , V 30 , and V 40 DVHs of the lung ( p  < 0.0003) and with the lung mean dose ( p  < 0.0001). Conclusion The results of this study suggest that by using HT it is possible to safely escalate the dose delivery to at least 62.5 Gy in PET-positive areas while treating the pleural cavity to 56 Gy in 25 fractions without significantly increasing the dose to the surrounding normal organs.
Author Maggio, Angelo
Poli, Matteo
Cutaia, Claudia
Di Dia, Amalia
Bresciani, Sara
Gabriele, Pietro
Stasi, Michele
Miranti, Anna
Mastro, Elena Del
Garibaldi, Elisabetta
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Angelo
  surname: Maggio
  fullname: Maggio, Angelo
  email: maggio.angelo@gmail.com
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Claudia
  surname: Cutaia
  fullname: Cutaia, Claudia
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Amalia
  surname: Di Dia
  fullname: Di Dia, Amalia
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Sara
  surname: Bresciani
  fullname: Bresciani, Sara
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Anna
  surname: Miranti
  fullname: Miranti, Anna
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Matteo
  surname: Poli
  fullname: Poli, Matteo
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Elena Del
  surname: Mastro
  fullname: Mastro, Elena Del
  organization: Radiotherapy Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Elisabetta
  surname: Garibaldi
  fullname: Garibaldi, Elisabetta
  organization: Radiotherapy Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Pietro
  surname: Gabriele
  fullname: Gabriele, Pietro
  organization: Radiotherapy Department, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Michele
  surname: Stasi
  fullname: Stasi, Michele
  organization: Medical Physics, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO, IRCCS
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453534$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp1kE1LAzEURYMo9kN_gBspCOIm-pJMMslSSv2Agi4quAuZTKZOmU5q0ln035syVURw9QjvvHvDGaHj1rcOoQsCtwQgv4sAIAQGwjEoIFgeoSHJmEov9X6MhkByhXPC5QCNYlwBEJGp7BQNqMg44ywbouuFX_vthwtms5u8zhZ42dWlKyelj27iojWN2da-PUMnlWmiOz_MMXp7mC2mT3j-8vg8vZ9jy0BJbAknGc-sK4CqjCujqFQF4YJWPDUy4Ia53OYUnCJU5JIXRjKorDMsF7xkY3TT526C_-xc3Op1Ha1rGtM630VNcqkoCClFQq_-oCvfhTb9LlFcQqoGmijSUzb4GIOr9CbUaxN2moDeS9S9RJ0k6r1ELdPN5SG5K9au_Ln4tpYA2gMxrdqlC7-q_039Apabek0
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.012
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60727-8
10.1200/JCO.2005.06.502
10.1016/S0003-4975(96)01228-3
10.1093/annonc/mdu438.65
10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816fca1b
10.1007/s00259-013-2561-1
10.1007/s00066-003-1055-7
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.057
10.1378/chest.108.3.754
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.076
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00287-6
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
10.1007/s00066-011-2234-6
10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70149-8
10.1510/icvts.2010.255901
10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.06.010
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.06.002
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.041
10.1002/ijc.20820
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.037
10.1016/j.radonc.2009.03.011
10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.010
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.011
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015
– notice: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7RV
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
ARAPS
BENPR
BGLVJ
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
P5Z
P62
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s00066-015-0901-8
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Public Health Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)
AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Technology Collection
ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection
ProQuest Public Health
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Technology Collection

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: ECM
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&site=ehost-live
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
DocumentTitle_FL PET-geführte Dosiseskalation mit der Tomotherapie
EISSN 1439-099X
EndPage 108
ExternalDocumentID 3925962811
10_1007_s00066_015_0901_8
26453534
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.86
.VR
04C
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
1N0
1SB
203
29Q
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
3O-
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5RE
5VS
67Z
6NX
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FE
8FG
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AANXM
AANZL
AAPBV
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAWTL
AAYFA
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABIWU
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABPLI
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHXU
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACTTH
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AESTI
AETLH
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGJBK
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARAPS
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BDATZ
BENPR
BGLVJ
BGNMA
BKEYQ
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EN4
ESBYG
EX3
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GXS
HCIFZ
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
IWAJR
IXC
IXD
IXE
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KPH
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NAPCQ
NB0
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9I
O9J
OAM
P62
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
Q2X
QOR
QOS
R89
R9I
RIG
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
S16
S1Z
S27
S37
S3B
SAP
SDH
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SZ9
SZN
T13
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UDS
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WJK
WK8
WOW
X7J
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z82
Z87
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
ZXP
AACDK
AAJBT
AASML
AAYZH
ABAKF
ACAOD
ACDTI
ACZOJ
AEFQL
AEMSY
AFBBN
AGQEE
AGRTI
AIGIU
ALIPV
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
EMB
EMOBN
H13
NPM
SV3
AAYXX
CITATION
7XB
8FK
DWQXO
K9.
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c3098-c151454ceb029459a9289b1562f5453305a3e7c720e9126785ba830fcea3765d3
IEDL.DBID AEJHL
ISSN 0179-7158
1439-099X
IngestDate Sat Oct 26 04:31:18 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 22:02:03 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 20:57:10 EST 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:07:21 EDT 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:02:04 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords Maligne Pleuramesotheliome
Helical tomotherapy
Pleural malignant mesothelioma
PET imaging
Dose escalation
PET-Bildgebung
Survival
Dosiseskalation
Überleben
Helikale Tomotherapie
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c3098-c151454ceb029459a9289b1562f5453305a3e7c720e9126785ba830fcea3765d3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
PMID 26453534
PQID 1758092802
PQPubID 54006
PageCount 7
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1789206886
proquest_journals_1758092802
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00066_015_0901_8
pubmed_primary_26453534
springer_journals_10_1007_s00066_015_0901_8
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2016-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2016-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2016
  text: 2016-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Berlin/Heidelberg
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Berlin/Heidelberg
– name: Germany
– name: Heidelberg
PublicationSubtitle Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
PublicationTitle Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
PublicationTitleAbbrev Strahlenther Onkol
PublicationTitleAlternate Strahlenther Onkol
PublicationYear 2016
Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References BatirelHMetintasMCaglarHBYildizeliBLacinTBostanciKAkgulAEvmanSYukselMTrimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesotheliomaJ Thorac Oncol200834995041844900210.1097/JTO.0b013e31816fca1b
SharifSZahidIRoutledgeTScarciMDoes positron emission tomography offer prognostic information in malignant pleural mesothelioma?Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg2011128068112126649310.1510/icvts.2010.255901
CarmichaelJDegraffWGGamsonJRadiation sensitivity of human lung cancer cell linesEur J Cancer Clin Oncol19892535273534
McAleerM.FTsaoALiaoZRadiotherapy in malignant pleural mesotheliomaInt J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys200975232633710.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.037
GuptaVMychalczakBKrugLHemithoracic radiation therapy after pleurectomy/decortications for malignant pleural mesotheliomaInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys200563104510521605477410.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.041
KristensenCANottrupTJBerthelsenAKPulmonary toxicity following IMRT after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesotheliomaRadiother Oncol20099296991936462110.1016/j.radonc.2009.03.011
AllenAMCzerminskaMJannePAFatal pneumonitis associated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy for mesotheliomaInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys2006656406451675105810.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.012
FodorAFiorinoCDell’OcaIPET-guided dose escalation tomotherapy in malignant pleural mesotheliomaStrahlenther Onkol20111877367432203765010.1007/s00066-011-2234-6
SterzingFSroka-PerezGSchubertKEvaluating target coverage and normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant radiotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRTRadiother Oncol2008862512571820759710.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.010
NCCN Guidelines Version 1 (2014) Malignant pleural mesothelioma
PaganVCeronLPaccagnellaAPizziG5-year prospective results of trimodality treatment for malignant pleural mesotheliomaJ Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)2006475956011:STN:280:DC%2BD28ngtFegug%3D%3D
MuersMFStephensRJFisherPDarlisonLHiggsCMLowryEActive symptom control with or without chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MS01): a multicentre randomised trialLancet200837116851694184867411:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXlvFymt7g%3D243112310.1016/S0140-6736(08)60727-8
Stahel R, Weder W, Riesterer O et al (2014) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with or without hemithoracic radiotherapy: final results of the randomized multicenter phase II trial SAKK17/04. ESMO 2014 late breaking abstract
NakasATrousseDSMartin-UcarAEOpen lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: the benefits of a radical approach within multimodality therapyEur J Card Thorac Surg20083488689110.1016/j.ejcts.2008.06.010
PatelPYooSBroadwaterGEffect of increasing experience on dosimetric and clinical outcomes in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma with intensity-modulated radiation therapyInt J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys201283136236810.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.057
MunterMWNillSThilmannCStereotactic intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and inverse treatment planning for advanced pleural mesothelioma. Feasibility and initial resultsStrahelenther Onkol200317953554110.1007/s00066-003-1055-7
Fact sheet N343 World Health Organisation (2010) Asbestos: elimination of asbestos-related diseases. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs343/en/index.html
KlabatsaAChickloreSBarringtonFSThe association of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters with survival in malignant pleural mesotheliomaEur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging201441276282240574591:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhsFWrtr7J10.1007/s00259-013-2561-1
(2010) Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 76:S3–S9
StevensCRiceDForsterKExtrapleural pneumonectomy followed by IMRT: Results of a Phase I/II studyJ Clin Oncol200523717810.1200/JCO.2005.06.502
TreasureTLang-LazdunskiLWallerDExtra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility studyLancet Oncol20111276377221723781314843010.1016/S1470-2045(11)70149-8
MarinaccioAMontanaroFMastrantonioMUccelliRAltavistaPNestiMCostantiniASGoriniGPredictions of mortality from pleural mesothelioma in Italy: a model based on asbestos consumption gures supports results from age-period-cohort modelsInt J Cancer200511414214710.1002/ijc.20820
BoutinCReyFViallatJRPrevention of malignant seeding after invasive diagnostic procedures in patients with pleural mesothelioma. A randomized trial of local radiotherapyChest199510875475876566291:STN:280:DyaK2MzosFCiug%3D%3D10.1378/chest.108.3.754
AbakayAKomekHAbakayORelationship between 18 FDG PET-CT findings and the survival of 177 patients with malignant pleural mesotheliomaEur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci20131712331241236901931:STN:280:DC%2BC3snltlymsg%3D%3D
YajnikSRosenzweigKEMychalczakBHemithoracic radiation after extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesotheliomaInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys200356131913261287367610.1016/S0360-3016(03)00287-6
UngYCYuEFalksonCThe role of radiation therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic reviewRadiother Oncol20068013181682023810.1016/j.radonc.2006.06.002
MilesEFLarrierNAKelseyCRIntensity-modulated radiotherapy for resected mesothelioma: the Duke experienceInt J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys200871114311501826236910.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.011
BaldiniEHRechtAStraussGMPatterns of failure after trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesotheliomaAnn Thorac Surg19976333433890332961:STN:280:DyaK2s7osFKitw%3D%3D10.1016/S0003-4975(96)01228-3
RiceDCStevensCWCorreaAMOutcomes after extrapleural pneumonectomy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for malignant pleural mesotheliomaAnn Thorac Surg200784168516931795408610.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.076
26545763 - Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Dec;191(12):987. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0920-5
S Sharif (901_CR10) 2011; 12
EH Baldini (901_CR24) 1997; 63
MW Munter (901_CR21) 2003; 179
A Klabatsa (901_CR11) 2014; 41
YC Ung (901_CR12) 2006; 80
901_CR25
A Abakay (901_CR23) 2013; 17
901_CR1
DC Rice (901_CR15) 2007; 84
V Pagan (901_CR8) 2006; 47
901_CR26
M.F McAleer (901_CR19) 2009; 75
H Batirel (901_CR7) 2008; 3
AM Allen (901_CR16) 2006; 65
P Patel (901_CR18) 2012; 83
MF Muers (901_CR3) 2008; 371
V Gupta (901_CR4) 2005; 63
A Nakas (901_CR6) 2008; 34
A Fodor (901_CR22) 2011; 187
EF Miles (901_CR28) 2008; 71
C Stevens (901_CR9) 2005; 23
A Marinaccio (901_CR2) 2005; 114
901_CR14
S Yajnik (901_CR27) 2003; 56
CA Kristensen (901_CR17) 2009; 92
T Treasure (901_CR20) 2011; 12
J Carmichael (901_CR13) 1989; 25
F Sterzing (901_CR29) 2008; 86
C Boutin (901_CR5) 1995; 108
References_xml – volume: 25
  start-page: 3527
  year: 1989
  ident: 901_CR13
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol
  contributor:
    fullname: J Carmichael
– volume: 65
  start-page: 640
  year: 2006
  ident: 901_CR16
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.03.012
  contributor:
    fullname: AM Allen
– volume: 371
  start-page: 1685
  year: 2008
  ident: 901_CR3
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60727-8
  contributor:
    fullname: MF Muers
– volume: 23
  start-page: 7178
  year: 2005
  ident: 901_CR9
  publication-title: J Clin Oncol
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.502
  contributor:
    fullname: C Stevens
– volume: 63
  start-page: 334
  year: 1997
  ident: 901_CR24
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(96)01228-3
  contributor:
    fullname: EH Baldini
– ident: 901_CR25
  doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu438.65
– volume: 3
  start-page: 499
  year: 2008
  ident: 901_CR7
  publication-title: J Thorac Oncol
  doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31816fca1b
  contributor:
    fullname: H Batirel
– volume: 41
  start-page: 276
  year: 2014
  ident: 901_CR11
  publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
  doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2561-1
  contributor:
    fullname: A Klabatsa
– volume: 179
  start-page: 535
  year: 2003
  ident: 901_CR21
  publication-title: Strahelenther Onkol
  doi: 10.1007/s00066-003-1055-7
  contributor:
    fullname: MW Munter
– volume: 83
  start-page: 362
  issue: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 901_CR18
  publication-title: Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.057
  contributor:
    fullname: P Patel
– volume: 108
  start-page: 754
  year: 1995
  ident: 901_CR5
  publication-title: Chest
  doi: 10.1378/chest.108.3.754
  contributor:
    fullname: C Boutin
– volume: 84
  start-page: 1685
  year: 2007
  ident: 901_CR15
  publication-title: Ann Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.076
  contributor:
    fullname: DC Rice
– volume: 56
  start-page: 1319
  year: 2003
  ident: 901_CR27
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00287-6
  contributor:
    fullname: S Yajnik
– ident: 901_CR14
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040
– volume: 187
  start-page: 736
  year: 2011
  ident: 901_CR22
  publication-title: Strahlenther Onkol
  doi: 10.1007/s00066-011-2234-6
  contributor:
    fullname: A Fodor
– volume: 12
  start-page: 763
  year: 2011
  ident: 901_CR20
  publication-title: Lancet Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70149-8
  contributor:
    fullname: T Treasure
– volume: 12
  start-page: 806
  year: 2011
  ident: 901_CR10
  publication-title: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.255901
  contributor:
    fullname: S Sharif
– volume: 34
  start-page: 886
  year: 2008
  ident: 901_CR6
  publication-title: Eur J Card Thorac Surg
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.06.010
  contributor:
    fullname: A Nakas
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1233
  year: 2013
  ident: 901_CR23
  publication-title: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci
  contributor:
    fullname: A Abakay
– volume: 80
  start-page: 13
  year: 2006
  ident: 901_CR12
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2006.06.002
  contributor:
    fullname: YC Ung
– volume: 63
  start-page: 1045
  year: 2005
  ident: 901_CR4
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.041
  contributor:
    fullname: V Gupta
– volume: 114
  start-page: 142
  year: 2005
  ident: 901_CR2
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.20820
  contributor:
    fullname: A Marinaccio
– volume: 47
  start-page: 595
  year: 2006
  ident: 901_CR8
  publication-title: J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)
  contributor:
    fullname: V Pagan
– ident: 901_CR1
– volume: 75
  start-page: 326
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 901_CR19
  publication-title: Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.037
  contributor:
    fullname: M.F McAleer
– volume: 92
  start-page: 96
  year: 2009
  ident: 901_CR17
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.03.011
  contributor:
    fullname: CA Kristensen
– volume: 86
  start-page: 251
  year: 2008
  ident: 901_CR29
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.12.010
  contributor:
    fullname: F Sterzing
– ident: 901_CR26
– volume: 71
  start-page: 1143
  year: 2008
  ident: 901_CR28
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.011
  contributor:
    fullname: EF Miles
SSID ssj0016494
Score 2.1814709
Snippet Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with...
The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with unresectable...
Aim The aim of this study was to investigate whether a safe escalation of the dose to the pleural cavity and PET/CT-positive areas in patients with...
SourceID proquest
crossref
pubmed
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 102
SubjectTerms Aged
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Humans
Lung - radiation effects
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Mesothelioma - mortality
Mesothelioma - radiotherapy
Middle Aged
Multimodal Imaging
Oncology
Original Article
Pleural Neoplasms - mortality
Pleural Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Positron-Emission Tomography
Radiation Dosage
Radiometry
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - methods
Survival Rate
Tomography, Spiral Computed
Subtitle A dosimetric feasibility study for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma
Title Tomotherapy PET-guided dose escalation
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00066-015-0901-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26453534
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1758092802
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1789206886
Volume 192
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3dS8MwED_cBuKL3x_VKRXEB6XSpcmSPE7dmKJj4ATfStNeRYROnPv_vfQLZfqgT31oSC53l7vf5ZILwIkRvjGKohPOOHq8k3DPSBN7iFIqNISQjL3vPHyQoyd13bdlcli9dZG9XlQZydxQ13fdcu9Ika-wWwsdTzWgRa5H8Ca0ev3b4V2dO-hyXVT0ltqTHaGqXOZPnXz3RgsQcyE9mnudwdp_6F2H1RJjur1CKTZgCbNNWL4vs-hbcDqxR_CKcgLuuD_xnucvCSZuMp2hizOSWi6ubXgc9CdXQ698L8GLA1sWNCbvzQWP0fhMc6EjTdGUoQCNpYSTAlrZUYAylsxH3WHkpYSJVOCnMUZkZkQS7EAzm2a4By4qLWMuOU-V5hhx3eWpNUWEh1ik_MiBs4pv4VtRFiOsCyDnMw9p5qGdeagcaFecDcsVMgsJtiifCPSZA8f1b9Jtm7CIMpzObRulmX0Vp-vAbiGRejQCciIQAXfgvOL_l85_I2X_T60PYIXwUXlIuw3Nj_c5HkJjlsyPSqWj7-BmdDn-BC5tzMI
link.rule.ids 315,782,786,27934,27935,41074,42143,48345,48348,48358,49650,49653,49663,52154
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT8MwDLbYJgEX3o_CgCIhDqBKXZssyXGCjU1sExJF4lY1rYe4bIjS_4_Tl0CDA5wb5WEn9ufa-QJwobmrtaTohHkMHdZJmKOFjh1EISRqQkja3HcePorps7ztG5ocv7oLk1e7VynJ3FLXl91y90ihLzf_FjqObEDLkJ27TWj1RsHdoE4edJkqKL2FckSHyyqZ-VMn393REsZcyo_mbmew-a8Jb8FGiTLtXrEttmEF5zuwOinz6LtwGZgivIJQwH7oB85L9ppgYieLFG1MSW-5wvbgadAPboZO-WKCE_uGGDQm_804i1G7nmJcRYriKU0hmjcjpOTT2Y58FLHwXFQdj_wU15H03VmMERkanvj70Jwv5ngINkolYiYYm0nFMCJJs5kxRoSIvEi6kQVXleDCt4IYI6wpkPOVh7Ty0Kw8lBa0K9GG5RlJQwIu0qUJup4F5_Vn2t0mZRHNcZGZNlJ55l2crgUHhUrq0QjKcZ_7zILrSv5fOv9tKkd_an0Ga8NgMg7Ho-n9MawTWipLttvQ_HjP8AQaaZKdljvwEw-dzxc
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LS8NAEB60heLF9yNaNYJ4UELTZLe7exLRlqq1FKzgLWSTiXhJizX_39m8UNSDeM6yr5nd-SYz8y3Aqeau1pK8E-YxdFg3Zo4WOnIQhZCoCSFpU-88fBTjZ3nTNzQ5l1UtTJ7tXoUki5oGw9KUvnfmcdKpC99yU0luMDf_GbqOXIYmM6mFDWhe9e-GozqQ0GOqoPcWyhFdLqvA5k-dfDVN3_Dmt1hpboIGa_-e_DqslujTvirUZQOWMN2E1kMZX9-Cs6lJziuIBuxJf-q8ZK8xxnY8W6CNC5JnLshteBr0p9dDp3xJwYl8QxgakV1nnEWoXU8xrkJFfpYm181LCEH5dOZDH0UkPBdV1yP7xXUofTeJMKQLiMf-DjTSWYp7YKNUImKCsUQqhiFTPZaYS4qQkhdKN7TgvNrEYF4QZgQ1NXK-8oBWHpiVB9KCdrXNQXl2FgEBGunSBF3PgpP6M2m9CWWEKc4y00Yqz7yX07NgtxBPPRpBPO5zn1lwUcniU-e_TWX_T62PoTW5GQSj2_H9AawQiCozudvQeH_L8BCWF3F2VCrjBw_y1-M
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tomotherapy+PET-guided+dose+escalation&rft.jtitle=Strahlentherapie+und+Onkologie&rft.au=Maggio%2C+Angelo&rft.au=Cutaia%2C+Claudia&rft.au=Di+Dia%2C+Amalia&rft.au=Bresciani%2C+Sara&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.pub=Springer+Berlin+Heidelberg&rft.issn=0179-7158&rft.eissn=1439-099X&rft.volume=192&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=102&rft.epage=108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00066-015-0901-8&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s00066_015_0901_8
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0179-7158&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0179-7158&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0179-7158&client=summon