Mouth opening limitation and influence of age and surgical location for static fully guided dental implant placement: an observational, cross-sectional clinical study

• Published in: International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery Vol. 53; no. 6; pp. 526 - 532
• Main Authors: Gargallo-Albiol, J., Ortega-Martínez, J., Salomó-Coll, O., López-Boado, A.P., Paternostro-Betancourt, D., Hernández-Alfaro, F.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Denmark Elsevier Inc 01-06-2024
• Subjects: Adult; Age Factors; Age groups; Aged; Computer-aided surgery; Cross-Sectional Studies; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods; Dental Implants; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mouth rehabilitation; Passive range of motion; Surgery, Computer-Assisted - methods; Tooth loss; Passive range of motion; Tooth loss; Computer-aided surgery; Dental implants; Mouth rehabilitation; Age groups
• ISSN: 0901-5027; 1399-0020
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.01.008

The influence of age and region of the mouth was assessed in regard to mouth opening in fully guided implant placement. Ninety patients were included in this study, 30 in each of three age groups (20–34, 35–55, and >55 years). Maximum passive mouth opening was recorded in three locations: incisal, canine, and molar. The minimum distance required to allow the bone drilling sequence through a static fully guided approach was analysed for four implant systems: Straumann, MIS Dentsply, Astra Tech Dentsply, and Dentium. The mean ± standard deviation maximum mouth opening (all 90 patients) was 46.34 ± 7.70 mm, 36.82 ± 5.92 mm, and 30.99 ± 5.40 mm in the incisal, premolar, and molar region, respectively. No significant difference in mouth opening at any of the three locations was found between the age groups (all P > 0.05). However, a correlation was found between increasing age and decreasing average mouth opening in all three mouth regions; each additional 1 year resulted in a mean reduction of 0.13 mm, 0.09 mm, and 0.08 mm in the incisal, premolar, and molar region, respectively. The minimum required mouth opening was most likely to be met for implant placement in the incisal region (98.9% of all patients) and least likely to be met for placement in the molar region, particularly for older patients (as low as 30% of patients). Mouth opening remains a major limitation in fully guided implant surgery, especially in posterior areas and in older patients. The use of some implant systems in the posterior area may be limited to only one in three patients.