Does follow-up really matter? A convergent mixed methods study exploring follow-up across levels of care in rehabilitation of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases

• Published in: Disability and rehabilitation Vol. 46; no. 23; pp. 1 - 5544
• Main Authors: Berdal, Gunnhild, Sand-Svartrud, Anne-Lene, Linge, Anita Dyb, Aasvold, Ann Margret, Tennebø, Kjetil, Eppeland, Siv G, Hagland, Anne Sirnes, Ohldieck-Fredheim, Guro, Lindtvedt Valaas, Helene, Bø, Ingvild, Klokkeide, Åse, Sexton, Joseph, Azimi, Maryam, Dager, Turid N, Kjeken, Ingvild
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 05-11-2024
• Subjects: mixed methods; health behaviour change; goal setting; motivational interviewing; Rehabilitation; follow-up care; rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases
• ISSN: 0963-8288; 1464-5165; 1464-5165
• DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2310170

To explore what patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) need and receive of follow-up care after specialized rehabilitation, and whether received follow-up is associated with health outcomes after 1 year. Further, to compare these findings with patients' experiences to improve the understanding of how follow-up takes place.
In a mixed methods study, patients received a rehabilitation programme designed to improve the continuity in rehabilitation across care levels. A total of 168 patients completed questionnaires, of which 21 were also interviewed.
At discharge, most patients reported needs for follow-up. These needs were largely met within 1 year, mainly resulting from patients' initiatives to re-connect with previous contacts. The degree of received follow-up was not associated with goal attainment, quality of life, or physical function. Factors related to providers (competence, communication skills), context (delays, limited access to care), and patients (motivation, life situation, preferences) seemed to be decisive for the progress of the rehabilitation process over time.
The results provide evidence that access to follow-up care is crucial to patients with RMDs. However, it also highlights several factors that may influence its impact. These results can be used to optimise design and implementation of future follow-up interventions.