Interactions between the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio and the salt marsh grasses Phragmites australis and Spartina alterniflora

• Published in: Biological invasions Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 25 - 30
• Main Authors: Robertson, T. L., Weis, J. S.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dordrecht Springer Nature B.V 01-01-2007
• Subjects: Aquariums; Aquatic organisms; Aquatic plants; Brackish; Forage; Grasses; Indigenous plants; Palaemonetes pugio; Phragmites australis; Salt marshes; Shellfish; Shoots; Spartina alterniflora
• ISSN: 1387-3547; 1573-1464
• DOI: 10.1007/s10530-006-9002-z

The grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio, a species common to Spartina alterniflora-dominated marshes, may be sensitive to the invasion of the common reed Phragmites australis in northeastern US salt marshes. We examined two questions: (1) Do grass shrimp have a preference for the native plant over the non-native plant? (2) Are grass shrimp more effective foragers on P. australis? We tested the first hypothesis by comparing the amount of time shrimp spend in physical contact with the plant types over a 1-h period. Shrimp were observed under different arrangements of vegetation to control for differences in conspicuous structural features. Additionally, the amount of time shrimp spent foraging on S. alterniflora and P. australis shoots was compared to determine if shrimp graze more often on S. alterniflora. Shrimp spent significantly more time in contact with S. alterniflora only when plant types were grouped at opposite ends of aquaria, but did not exhibit a foraging preference for this plant type. To address our second question, we investigated the effects of shrimp foraging on stem epifauna, an assemblage of semi-aquatic invertebrates associated with macrophyte shoots. Previous research showed that P. australis supports a lower density of stem-dwelling epifauna relative to S. alterniflora. We hypothesized that the primary grazer of this community, P. pugio, can forage on P. australis stems more effectively due to structural differences between the two plants, causing the lower abundance of epifauna through top-down effects. We exposed individual shoots inhabited by epifauna to shrimp and compared faunal densities on exposed shoots to densities on control shoots after 18 h. The reduction of epifauna by predation was proportional on the two plant types. Therefore, top-down effects can be ruled out as an explanation for the patchy distribution of epifauna observed in P. australis-S. alterniflora marshes.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]