Immunogenicity and Safety of a Purified Vero Rabies Vaccine—Serum Free, Compared With 2 Licensed Vaccines, in a Simulated Rabies Post-Exposure Regimen in Healthy Adults in France: A Randomized, Controlled, Phase 3 Trial

Abstract Background A next-generation Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG2) was developed using the same Pitman–Moore strain as in the licensed purified Vero cell vaccine (PVRV; Verorab) and the human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV; Imovax Rabies®). Methods This dual-center, modified, double-blind, phase...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical infectious diseases Vol. 78; no. 6; pp. 1748 - 1756
Main Authors: Pineda-Peña, Andrea-Clemencia, Jiang, Qian, Petit, Celine, Korejwo-Peyramond, Joanna, Donazzolo, Yves, Latreille, Mathilde, Homery, Marie-Claude, Babin, Valerie, Benamor, Sonia, Pichon, Sylvie, Guinet-Morlot, Françoise, Minutello, Ada-Maria
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: US Oxford University Press 14-06-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background A next-generation Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV-NG2) was developed using the same Pitman–Moore strain as in the licensed purified Vero cell vaccine (PVRV; Verorab) and the human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV; Imovax Rabies®). Methods This dual-center, modified, double-blind, phase 3 study evaluated the immunogenic non-inferiority and safety of PVRV-NG2 with and without concomitant intramuscular human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG) versus PVRV + HRIG and HDCV + HRIG in a simulated post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) regimen. Healthy adults ≥18 years old (N = 640) were randomized 3:1:1:1 to PVRV-NG2 + HRIG, PVRV + HRIG, HDCV + HRIG, or PVRV-NG2 alone (administered as single vaccine injections on days [D] 0, D3, D7, D14, and 28, with HRIG on D0 in applicable groups). Rabies virus neutralizing antibodies (RVNA) titers were assessed pre- (D0) and post-vaccination (D14, D28, and D42) using the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. Non-inferiority, based on the proportion of participants achieving RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL (primary objective), was demonstrated if the lower limit of the 95% CI of the difference in proportions between PVRV-NG2 + HRIG and PVRV + HRIG/HDCV + HRIG was >−5% at D28. Safety was assessed up to 6 months after the last injection. Results Non-inferiority of PVRV-NG2 + HRIG compared with PVRV + HRIG and HDCV + HRIG was demonstrated. Nearly all participants (99.6%, PVRV-NG2 + HRIG; 100%, PVRV + HRIG; 98.7%, HDCV + HRIG; 100%, PVRV-NG2 alone) achieved RVNA titers ≥0.5 IU/mL at D28. Geometric mean titers were similar between groups with concomitant HRIG administration at all time points. Safety profiles were similar between PVRV-NG2 and comparator vaccines. Conclusions In a simulated PEP setting, PVRV-NG2 + HRIG showed comparable immunogenicity and safety to current standard-of-care vaccines. Clinical Trials Registration NCT03965962. The next-generation rabies vaccine PVRV-NG2, demonstrated immunogenic non-inferiority versus standard-of-care vaccines and a favorable safety profile when co-administered with human rabies immunoglobulin or as a stand-alone vaccine in a simulated post-exposure prophylaxis, phase 3 trial in healthy adults. Graphical Abstract Graphical Abstract
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Presented in part: American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2022, Seattle, Washington, 30 October–3 November 2022 (abstract LB-5464); https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/minimising-risk-transmitting-animal-spongiform-encephalopathy-agents-human-veterinary-medicinal).
Potential conflicts of interest. A. C. P. P., Q. J., C. P., J. K. P., V. B., S. B., S. P., F. G. M., and A. M. M. are employees of Sanofi and may hold shares and/or stock options in the company. Y. D. reports other financial or nonfinancial interests as investigator and CEO of 1 of the investigation sites. All other authors report no potential conflicts.
All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae137