The Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum and Urine Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Ovarian Cancer in 15,394 Subjects: An Updated Meta-Analysis
Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent r...
Saved in:
Published in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) Vol. 14; no. 10; p. e30457 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
United States
Cureus Inc
19-10-2022
Cureus |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library. Result and conclusion This meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Registration number This meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library. Result and conclusion This meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Registration number This meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947.Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library. Result and conclusion This meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Registration number This meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947. Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library. Result and conclusion This meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Registration number This meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947. Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods Electronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library. Result and conclusion This meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Registration number This meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947. BackgroundWe aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.MethodsElectronic databases and search engines such as PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched systematically by two independent reviewers to retrieve articles published from inception to June 11, 2022. The diagnostic accuracy of serum and urinary HE4 was computed using the random-effects model in terms of pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). To explain any source of possible heterogeneity, meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tools recommended by the Cochrane Library.Result and conclusionThis meta-analysis included a total of 38 studies of serum HE4 involving 14,745 subjects and five studies for urinary HE4 involving 649 subjects. We observed acceptable pooled sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristics (SROC), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.87-0.95), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91), and 43 (95% CI: 25-72), respectively, for serum HE4 for discriminating ovarian cancer. For urine HE4, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, SROC, and DOR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.90), 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91-0.95), and 55 (95% CI: 15-198), respectively. Therefore, HE4 is a promising biomarker with a high degree of specificity and acceptable sensitivity for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.Registration numberThis meta-analysis was performed after the registration of the protocol in the PROSPERO database with registration number CRD42022324947. |
Author | Singh, Aditya V Sharma, Saumya Nalini, Neelam Singh, Bijeta Singh, Shreshtha Kumar, Amit Prakash, Jay |
AuthorAffiliation | 6 Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, AUS 1 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND 5 Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND 3 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medinirai Medical College, Ranchi, IND 2 Laboratory Medicine, Rajendra institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND 4 Medicine, Laxmi Chandravanshi Medical College, Ranchi, IND |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 4 Medicine, Laxmi Chandravanshi Medical College, Ranchi, IND – name: 1 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – name: 5 Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – name: 2 Laboratory Medicine, Rajendra institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – name: 3 Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medinirai Medical College, Ranchi, IND – name: 6 Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, AUS |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Neelam surname: Nalini fullname: Nalini, Neelam organization: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 2 givenname: Amit surname: Kumar fullname: Kumar, Amit organization: Laboratory Medicine, Rajendra institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 3 givenname: Saumya surname: Sharma fullname: Sharma, Saumya organization: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 4 givenname: Bijeta surname: Singh fullname: Singh, Bijeta organization: Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medinirai Medical College, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 5 givenname: Aditya V surname: Singh fullname: Singh, Aditya V organization: Medicine, Laxmi Chandravanshi Medical College, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 6 givenname: Jay surname: Prakash fullname: Prakash, Jay organization: Critical Care Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, IND – sequence: 7 givenname: Shreshtha surname: Singh fullname: Singh, Shreshtha organization: Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, New South Wales, AUS |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdkU9rGzEQxUVJadI0t56LoJcUsqn-S9tDwbhuXUhJIfFZaLXaRGZXcqTdgL9CPnXkOg1pTzPM_HjMm_cWHIQYHADvMTqXktef7ZTclM8pYly-AkcEC1UprNjBi_4QnOS8RghhJAmS6A04pIJhzqg8Ag_Xtw5-8-YmxDx6C2e2SBq7hbGDVy5NAzShhavkg4PLaTABLja-9e128Bn-TnF0PkAGT5cL9gmW9vLeJF-ouQnWpd0E8zNaM3g1NWtnx_wFzgJcbVozuhb-cqOpZsH02-zzO_C6M312J0_1GKy-L67ny-ri8sfP-eyisqSux6puaswEc6ZtFSKMSdXgtquNxIQIzAWhSirKOREdb4jimBghVYels4g3htJj8HWvu5mawbXWhTGZXm-SH0za6mi8_ncT_K2-ife6FlIqpIrA6ZNAineTy6Muz7Cu701wccqayGKYIlWTgn78D13HKRXDO4qRQmCxu-hsT9kUc06uez4GI73LWe9z1n9yLviHlwae4b-p0kcttaO7 |
Cites_doi | 10.1038/s41598-021-96552-9 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4695 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.03.013 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.044 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.017 10.3892/br.2017.913 10.1007/s40944-017-0168-3 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.017 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1103 10.3892/br.2016.682 10.1080/14737140.2017.1360138 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.106 10.1186/1757-2215-6-45 10.1016/j.cca.2017.05.029 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.008 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101713 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000804 10.1155/2018/7821574 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3924 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201031 10.2478/s11536-013-0218-x 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075 10.1038/modpathol.3800612 10.3390/jpm11111115 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.02.005 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.087 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.020 10.1159/000446238 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.04.011 10.1007/s13277-009-0015-y 10.1155/2018/5289804 10.1007/s13277-014-1811-6 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.031 10.3892/mco.2014.279 10.1007/s13277-014-1945-6 10.1016/j.cca.2011.04.028 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.036 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.015 10.1186/1471-2407-13-423 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.12.004 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.46 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.022 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)06 10.1515/CCLM.2011.709 10.1039/c1lc20479c 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821a3726 10.1007/s13277-011-0204-3 10.1002/cncr.22594 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635 10.1515/cclm-2011-0477 10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7 10.1001/jama.2017.19163 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000192 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092 10.1186/1746-1596-8-11 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318263efa2 10.1001/jama.2017.21926 10.1002/uog.12551 10.3322/caac.20121 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. 2022 Nalini et al. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. – notice: Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. 2022 Nalini et al. |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7X7 7XB 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S PIMPY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.7759/cureus.30457 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central China ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Publicly Available Content Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2168-8184 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_7759_cureus_30457 36415437 |
Genre | Journal Article Review |
GeographicLocations | Belgium United States--US China Egypt Poland Italy Thailand India |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Italy – name: India – name: China – name: Poland – name: Egypt – name: Belgium – name: Thailand – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | 3V. 53G 5VS 7X7 8FI 8FJ ABUWG ADBBV ADRAZ AFKRA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BCNDV BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI CCPQU FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE KQ8 M48 NPM OK1 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC RPM UKHRP AAYXX CITATION 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-9b91464eadd8024478b1df9a712261562387835526f5b28512a678f17ec05ba33 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2168-8184 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:35:03 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 04:05:48 EDT 2024 Tue Nov 12 17:23:43 EST 2024 Fri Aug 23 03:45:53 EDT 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:23:37 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 10 |
Keywords | carbohydrate antigen 125 biomarker ovarian cancer he4 transvaginal sonography |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2022, Nalini et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c299t-9b91464eadd8024478b1df9a712261562387835526f5b28512a678f17ec05ba33 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9677808/ |
PMID | 36415437 |
PQID | 2742923163 |
PQPubID | 2045583 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9677808 proquest_miscellaneous_2739430892 proquest_journals_2742923163 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_30457 pubmed_primary_36415437 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-10-19 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-10-19 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 10 year: 2022 text: 2022-10-19 day: 19 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: Palo Alto – name: Palo Alto (CA) |
PublicationTitle | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Cureus |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | Cureus Inc Cureus |
Publisher_xml | – name: Cureus Inc – name: Cureus |
References | Bandiera E (ref25) 2011; 20 Ahmed AA (ref29) 2019; 43 Shen F (ref24) 2017; 471 Priyanka V (ref32) 2017; 16 ref17 Dong L (ref47) 2008; 43 Molina R (ref52) 2011; 32 Kaijser J (ref36) 2014; 43 van Nagell JR Jr (ref6) 2007; 109 Lenhard M (ref56) 2011; 49 Ruggeri G (ref55) 2011; 412 Anton C (ref50) 2012; 67 Lin J (ref15) 2013; 167 Siegel R (ref1) 2011; 61 McInnes MD (ref18) 2018; 319 Gentry-Maharaj A (ref54) 2020; 222 Grossman DC (ref3) 2018; 319 Wang J (ref12) 2014; 35 Jacob F (ref40) 2011; 121 Fan Q (ref58) 2017; 7 Mitre A (ref48) 2020; 8 Ortiz-Muñoz B (ref51) 2014; 35 Chudecka-Głaz AM (ref66) 2015; 440 Chen X (ref22) 2015; 440 Dewan R (ref21) 2019; 20 Karlsen MA (ref53) 2012; 127 Scaletta G (ref13) 2017; 17 Lawicki S (ref26) 2013; 6 Moore RG (ref5) 2008; 108 Wei SU (ref34) 2016; 5 Wang S (ref61) 2011; 11 Yanaranop M (ref35) 2017; 82 Terzic MM (ref23) 2014; 9 ref2 Zhen S (ref4) 2014; 2 Aslan K (ref30) 2020; 49 Macedo AC (ref9) 2014; 24 Suri A (ref64) 2021; 11 Pitta Dda R (ref20) 2013; 13 Nolen B (ref39) 2010; 117 Galgano MT (ref63) 2006; 19 Abdalla N (ref27) 2018; 2018 Holcomb K (ref45) 2011; 205 Wu L (ref14) 2012; 22 Abdel-Azeez HA (ref28) 2010; 11 Van Gorp T (ref43) 2011; 104 Hamed EO (ref49) 2013; 8 Hellstrom I (ref59) 2010; 296 Dayyani F (ref11) 2016; 26 Whiting PF (ref19) 2011; 155 Andersen MR (ref42) 2010; 116 Park Y (ref38) 2011; 44 Chang X (ref44) 2011; 21 Huang J (ref16) 2018; 231 Anastasi E (ref41) 2010; 31 Montagnana M (ref46) 2011; 49 Macuks R (ref60) 2012; 13 Elorriaga MÁ (ref7) 2021; 11 Oranratanaphan S (ref31) 2018; 2018 Dochez V (ref65) 2019; 12 Drapkin R (ref62) 2005; 65 Ferraro S (ref10) 2013; 66 Liao JB (ref57) 2015; 137 Yu S (ref8) 2012; 50 Goff BA (ref37) 2017; 147 Wilailak S (ref33) 2015; 26 |
References_xml | – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: ref64 article-title: Diagnostic measures comparison for ovarian malignancy risk in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a meta-analysis publication-title: Sci Rep doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96552-9 contributor: fullname: Suri A – volume: 13 year: 2012 ident: ref60 article-title: Urinary concentrations of human epidydimis secretory protein 4 (He4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a case--control study publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.9.4695 contributor: fullname: Macuks R – volume: 296 year: 2010 ident: ref59 article-title: Detection of the HE4 protein in urine as a biomarker for ovarian neoplasms publication-title: Cancer Lett doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2010.03.013 contributor: fullname: Hellstrom I – volume: 137 year: 2015 ident: ref57 article-title: Detection of the HE4 protein in urine as a biomarker for ovarian neoplasms: clinical correlates publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.044 contributor: fullname: Liao JB – volume: 108 year: 2008 ident: ref5 article-title: The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvic mass publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.10.017 contributor: fullname: Moore RG – volume: 7 year: 2017 ident: ref58 article-title: Diagnostic value of urinary-to-serum human epididymis protein 4 ratio in ovarian cancer publication-title: Biomed Rep doi: 10.3892/br.2017.913 contributor: fullname: Fan Q – volume: 43 year: 2008 ident: ref47 article-title: [The values of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 and CA(125) assay in the diagnosis of ovarian malignancy] (Article in Chinese) publication-title: Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi contributor: fullname: Dong L – volume: 16 year: 2017 ident: ref32 article-title: A comparative study of RMI and ROMA in women presenting with an adnexal mass publication-title: Indian J Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1007/s40944-017-0168-3 contributor: fullname: Priyanka V – volume: 205 year: 2011 ident: ref45 article-title: Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.017 contributor: fullname: Holcomb K – volume: 20 year: 2019 ident: ref21 article-title: Diagnostic performance of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) for prediction of malignancy in ovarian masses publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.4.1103 contributor: fullname: Dewan R – volume: 5 year: 2016 ident: ref34 article-title: The diagnostic value of serum HE4 and CA-125 and ROMA index in ovarian cancer publication-title: Biomed Rep doi: 10.3892/br.2016.682 contributor: fullname: Wei SU – ident: ref17 – volume: 17 year: 2017 ident: ref13 article-title: The role of novel biomarker HE4 in the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of ovarian cancer: a systematic review publication-title: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther doi: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1360138 contributor: fullname: Scaletta G – volume: 155 year: 2011 ident: ref19 article-title: QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009 contributor: fullname: Whiting PF – volume: 127 year: 2012 ident: ref53 article-title: Evaluation of HE4, CA125, risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) and risk of malignancy index (RMI) as diagnostic tools of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.07.106 contributor: fullname: Karlsen MA – volume: 6 year: 2013 ident: ref26 article-title: The plasma concentration of VEGF, HE4 and CA125 as a new biomarkers panel in different stages and sub-types of epithelial ovarian tumors publication-title: J Ovarian Res doi: 10.1186/1757-2215-6-45 contributor: fullname: Lawicki S – ident: ref2 – volume: 471 year: 2017 ident: ref24 article-title: Performance of ROMA based on Architect CA 125 II and HE4 values in Chinese women presenting with a pelvic mass: a multicenter prospective study publication-title: Clin Chim Acta doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.05.029 contributor: fullname: Shen F – volume: 231 year: 2018 ident: ref16 article-title: Diagnostic value of HE4 in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.008 contributor: fullname: Huang J – volume: 49 year: 2020 ident: ref30 article-title: Comparison of HE 4, CA 125, ROMA score and ultrasound score in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses publication-title: J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101713 contributor: fullname: Aslan K – volume: 26 year: 2016 ident: ref11 article-title: Diagnostic performance of risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm against CA125 and HE4 in connection with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000804 contributor: fullname: Dayyani F – volume: 2018 year: 2018 ident: ref31 article-title: Assessment of diagnostic values among CA-125, RMI, HE4, and ROMA for cancer prediction in women with nonfunctional ovarian cysts publication-title: Obstet Gynecol Int doi: 10.1155/2018/7821574 contributor: fullname: Oranratanaphan S – volume: 65 year: 2005 ident: ref62 article-title: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is a secreted glycoprotein that is overexpressed by serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas publication-title: Cancer Res doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3924 contributor: fullname: Drapkin R – volume: 11 year: 2010 ident: ref28 article-title: HE4 and mesothelin: novel biomarkers of ovarian carcinoma in patients with pelvic masses publication-title: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev contributor: fullname: Abdel-Azeez HA – volume: 66 year: 2013 ident: ref10 article-title: Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs carbohydrate antigen 125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review publication-title: J Clin Pathol doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201031 contributor: fullname: Ferraro S – volume: 9 year: 2014 ident: ref23 article-title: Diagnostic value of serum tumor markers evaluation for adnexal masses publication-title: Cent Eur J Med doi: 10.2478/s11536-013-0218-x contributor: fullname: Terzic MM – volume: 49 year: 2011 ident: ref46 article-title: The ROMA (Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm) for estimating the risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in women presenting with pelvic mass: is it really useful? publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.075 contributor: fullname: Montagnana M – volume: 19 year: 2006 ident: ref63 article-title: Comprehensive analysis of HE4 expression in normal and malignant human tissues publication-title: Mod Pathol doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800612 contributor: fullname: Galgano MT – volume: 11 year: 2021 ident: ref7 article-title: Biomarkers in ovarian pathology: from screening to diagnosis. Review of the literature publication-title: J Pers Med doi: 10.3390/jpm11111115 contributor: fullname: Elorriaga MÁ – volume: 117 year: 2010 ident: ref39 article-title: Serum biomarker panels for the discrimination of benign from malignant cases in patients with an adnexal mass publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.02.005 contributor: fullname: Nolen B – volume: 116 year: 2010 ident: ref42 article-title: Use of a symptom index, CA125, and HE4 to predict ovarian cancer publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.10.087 contributor: fullname: Andersen MR – volume: 147 year: 2017 ident: ref37 article-title: Combining a symptom index, CA125 and HE4 (triple screen) to detect ovarian cancer in women with a pelvic mass publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.08.020 contributor: fullname: Goff BA – volume: 82 year: 2017 ident: ref35 article-title: Is the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm better than other tests for predicting ovarian malignancy in women with pelvic masses? publication-title: Gynecol Obstet Invest doi: 10.1159/000446238 contributor: fullname: Yanaranop M – volume: 44 year: 2011 ident: ref38 article-title: Diagnostic performances of HE4 and CA125 for the detection of ovarian cancer from patients with various gynecologic and non-gynecologic diseases publication-title: Clin Biochem doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.04.011 contributor: fullname: Park Y – volume: 31 year: 2010 ident: ref41 article-title: HE4: a new potential early biomarker for the recurrence of ovarian cancer publication-title: Tumour Biol doi: 10.1007/s13277-009-0015-y contributor: fullname: Anastasi E – volume: 2018 year: 2018 ident: ref27 article-title: Does the risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm provide better diagnostic performance than HE4 and CA125 in the presurgical differentiation of adnexal tumors in Polish women? publication-title: Dis Markers doi: 10.1155/2018/5289804 contributor: fullname: Abdalla N – volume: 35 year: 2014 ident: ref12 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of serum HE4, CA125 and ROMA in patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Tumour Biol doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1811-6 contributor: fullname: Wang J – volume: 222 year: 2020 ident: ref54 article-title: Serum HE4 and diagnosis of ovarian cancer in postmenopausal women with adnexal masses publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.07.031 contributor: fullname: Gentry-Maharaj A – volume: 2 year: 2014 ident: ref4 article-title: Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 and carbohydrate antigen 125 as markers in ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Mol Clin Oncol doi: 10.3892/mco.2014.279 contributor: fullname: Zhen S – volume: 35 year: 2014 ident: ref51 article-title: HE4, Ca125 and ROMA algorithm for differential diagnosis between benign gynaecological diseases and ovarian cancer publication-title: Tumour Biol doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1945-6 contributor: fullname: Ortiz-Muñoz B – volume: 412 year: 2011 ident: ref55 article-title: HE4 and epithelial ovarian cancer: comparison and clinical evaluation of two immunoassays and a combination algorithm publication-title: Clin Chim Acta doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.04.028 contributor: fullname: Ruggeri G – volume: 167 year: 2013 ident: ref15 article-title: Human epididymis protein 4 for differential diagnosis between benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.10.036 contributor: fullname: Lin J – volume: 440 year: 2015 ident: ref66 article-title: ROMA, an algorithm for ovarian cancer publication-title: Clin Chim Acta doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.015 contributor: fullname: Chudecka-Głaz AM – volume: 13 year: 2013 ident: ref20 article-title: Symptoms, CA125 and HE4 for the preoperative prediction of ovarian malignancy in Brazilian women with ovarian masses publication-title: BMC Cancer doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-423 contributor: fullname: Pitta Dda R – volume: 43 year: 2019 ident: ref29 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of CA125 and HE4 in ovarian carcinoma patients and the effect of confounders on their serum levels publication-title: Curr Probl Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2018.12.004 contributor: fullname: Ahmed AA – volume: 26 year: 2015 ident: ref33 article-title: Distinguishing benign from malignant pelvic mass utilizing an algorithm with HE4, menopausal status, and ultrasound findings publication-title: J Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.3802/jgo.2015.26.1.46 contributor: fullname: Wilailak S – volume: 121 year: 2011 ident: ref40 article-title: No benefit from combining HE4 and CA125 as ovarian tumor markers in a clinical setting publication-title: Gynecol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.022 contributor: fullname: Jacob F – volume: 67 year: 2012 ident: ref50 article-title: A comparison of CA125, HE4, risk ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA), and risk malignancy index (RMI) for the classification of ovarian masses publication-title: Clinics (Sao Paulo) doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(05)06 contributor: fullname: Anton C – volume: 49 year: 2011 ident: ref56 article-title: The diagnostic accuracy of two human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) testing systems in combination with CA125 in the differential diagnosis of ovarian masses publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2011.709 contributor: fullname: Lenhard M – volume: 11 year: 2011 ident: ref61 article-title: Integration of cell phone imaging with microchip ELISA to detect ovarian cancer HE4 biomarker in urine at the point-of-care publication-title: Lab Chip doi: 10.1039/c1lc20479c contributor: fullname: Wang S – volume: 21 year: 2011 ident: ref44 article-title: Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as a serum tumor biomarker in patients with ovarian carcinoma publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31821a3726 contributor: fullname: Chang X – volume: 32 year: 2011 ident: ref52 article-title: HE4 a novel tumour marker for ovarian cancer: comparison with CA 125 and ROMA algorithm in patients with gynaecological diseases publication-title: Tumour Biol doi: 10.1007/s13277-011-0204-3 contributor: fullname: Molina R – volume: 109 year: 2007 ident: ref6 article-title: Ovarian cancer screening with annual transvaginal sonography: findings of 25,000 women screened publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.22594 contributor: fullname: van Nagell JR Jr – volume: 20 year: 2011 ident: ref25 article-title: Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635 contributor: fullname: Bandiera E – volume: 50 year: 2012 ident: ref8 article-title: Diagnostic value of HE4 for ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis publication-title: Clin Chem Lab Med doi: 10.1515/cclm-2011-0477 contributor: fullname: Yu S – volume: 12 year: 2019 ident: ref65 article-title: Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review publication-title: J Ovarian Res doi: 10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7 contributor: fullname: Dochez V – volume: 319 year: 2018 ident: ref18 article-title: Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163 contributor: fullname: McInnes MD – volume: 24 year: 2014 ident: ref9 article-title: Accuracy of serum human epididymis protein 4 in ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000192 contributor: fullname: Macedo AC – volume: 104 year: 2011 ident: ref43 article-title: HE4 and CA125 as a diagnostic test in ovarian cancer: prospective validation of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606092 contributor: fullname: Van Gorp T – volume: 8 year: 2013 ident: ref49 article-title: Significance of HE4 estimation in comparison with CA125 in diagnosis of ovarian cancer and assessment of treatment response publication-title: Diagn Pathol doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-11 contributor: fullname: Hamed EO – volume: 22 year: 2012 ident: ref14 article-title: Diagnostic value of serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in ovarian carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis publication-title: Int J Gynecol Cancer doi: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e318263efa2 contributor: fullname: Wu L – volume: 319 year: 2018 ident: ref3 article-title: Screening for ovarian cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21926 contributor: fullname: Grossman DC – volume: 43 year: 2014 ident: ref36 article-title: Are serum HE4 or ROMA scores useful to experienced examiners for improving characterization of adnexal masses after transvaginal ultrasonography? publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.12551 contributor: fullname: Kaijser J – volume: 61 year: 2011 ident: ref1 article-title: Cancer statistics, 2011: the impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.20121 contributor: fullname: Siegel R – volume: 8 year: 2020 ident: ref48 article-title: Evaluation of HE4, CA125 as a diagnostic tools in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer in Albanian women publication-title: Int J Adv Sci Eng Technol contributor: fullname: Mitre A – volume: 440 year: 2015 ident: ref22 article-title: Development of a multimarker assay for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pelvic masses publication-title: Clin Chim Acta doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.11.013 contributor: fullname: Chen X |
SSID | ssj0001072070 |
Score | 2.285544 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods... BackgroundWe aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian... Background We aim to determine the diagnostic accuracy of both serum and urinary human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) in the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Methods... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | e30457 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Biopsy Cervical cancer Epidemiology/Public Health Ethnicity Immunoassay Medical diagnosis Meta-analysis Mortality Obstetrics/Gynecology Oncology Ovarian cancer Urine Womens health |
Title | The Diagnostic Accuracy of Serum and Urine Human Epididymis Protein 4 (HE4) in Ovarian Cancer in 15,394 Subjects: An Updated Meta-Analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36415437 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2742923163 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2739430892 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9677808 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LixNBEG7MHsSL-Da6Lr2goOAk06_09N5CNsteogsa8Db0a3DATEKSEfYv-KutmkfY6G1vw3TNg67qrq-rqr8m5H3kafQxNYlyhUukkMgBqWMSLPhKUTjOJs0htt_0lx_Z5RxpclS_F6Yp2veuHFW_VqOq_NnUVm5WftzXiY1vFjODrGdpNh6QAWDDO0v0JrCSag523Ba5a63M2NfbWO9GmBPUx-7nP0z5b2nkHV9z9YQ87kAinbY_85Q8iNUz8nDRpcGfkz-gXHrZFsmBCJ16-Lj1t3RdUBj89YraKtAlbuyjTZSezjdlKMMtKJXeIDNDWVFJP17P5ScKl19_w4oZpGZoAlu8w9RnYSSFaQXjNLsLOq3ocoPRgUAXcW-TnszkBVlezb_PrpPuUIXEg-fZJ8YZmBwlGFDIwD9LnTkWCmM1AyDGEA1lGAxSfFIoxwGPcQv-rGA6-lQ5K8RLclKtq_iaUGt8UDZmiqdBRs9dKKQtPLhdFgJjbkg-9H2db1rujBzWHKiTvNVJ3uhkSE57ReTdCNrlmEJG8DkRQ3J-aIZuwoSGreK6RhmB7PGZ4UPyqtXb4UNiAtBECni5PtLoQQB5tY9bwNwafu3OvN7c-8m35BHHXRJY-GJOycl-W8d3ZLAL9Vljq38BI63yMA |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,53800,53802 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Zj9MwELbYRQJeuI_CAkYCCaRNGx-pY96qbldFbJeV2Eq8Rb4iItG0ahuk_Qv8amZyVFt427coniRW5rNnPDP-TMj7wOPgQqyjxOY2kkIiB6QKkTdgK0VuORvWh9h-V-c_0pMJ0uQk3V6Yumjf2aJf_lr0y-JnXVu5WrhBVyc2uJiNNbKexenggNyG8RrH1xbpdWglVhyQ3JS5K5XogavWodr0MSuo9g3Qf17lv8WR16zN6YMb9vMhud-6l3TUND8it0L5mNyZtQn0J-QPwIKeNOV1IEJHDjpt3BVd5hSmjWpBTenpHLcE0jq-Tyerwhf-CuBAL5DToSippB-nE_mJwuW337DWBqkxgmeNd1hyLLSkMCFhhGfzmY5KOl9hXMHTWdiaqKNBeUrmp5PL8TRqj2OIHNisbaSthmlVAvR8CpZdqtQyn2ujGLhwDP2oFMNICR_mieXgyXEDljBnKrg4sUaIZ-SwXJbhBaFGO5-YkCY89jI4bn0uTe7AYDPvGbM98qHTUbZqWDcyWK2gLrNGl1mtyx456hSYtWNvk2HyGd3WoeiRd7tm-E2YCjFlWFYoI5B3PtW8R543-t59SAzBqZECXq72kLATQEbu_RYAQM3M3Sr85Y2ffEvuTi9nZ9nZl_Ovr8g9jnstsHxGH5HD7boKr8nBxldvarz_BU-cB9Q |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lj9MwELbYRVpxYXkuXRYwEkggkSZ2nDrmVvWhRdClElTiFvkVEYmmUdsg7V_gVzOTpNUWbnCLkklieT57xjPjz4S88jzy1kcqSExuAhEL5ICUPnAabGWcG84GzSG2X-TVt3Q8QZqc_VFfTdG-NUW__LHsl8X3prayWtpwVycWzmcjhaxnURpWLg-PyG0YsxG_sVBvwiuR5IDmttRdykSFtl77etPHzKA8NEJ_eZZ_FkjesDjT0_9o6z1yt3Mz6bAVuU9u-fIBOZl1ifSH5BfAg47bMjsQoUMLDdf2mq5yCtNHvaS6dHSBWwNpE-enk6pwhbsGWNA5cjsUJRX0zeVEvKVw-fknrLlBaoQgWuMdlryLlaAwMWGkZ_OeDku6qDC-4OjMb3Wwo0N5RBbTydfRZdAdyxBYsF3bQBkF06sACDrodyFkapjLlZYMXDmG_lSK4aSED_LEcPDouAaLmDPpbZQYHcePyXG5Kv0TQrWyLtE-TXjkhLfcuFzo3ILhZs4xZnrk9U5PWdWyb2SwakF9Zq0-s0afPXKxU2LWjcFNhklodF8HcY-83D-GbsKUiC79qkaZGPnnU8V75KzV-f5H8QCcGxHDx-UBGvYCyMx9-ARA0DB0d0o__-c3X5CT-Xiaffpw9fEpucNxywVW0agLcrxd1_4ZOdq4-nkD-d-YhQpU |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+Diagnostic+Accuracy+of+Serum+and+Urine+Human+Epididymis+Protein+4+%28HE4%29+in+Ovarian+Cancer+in+15%2C394+Subjects%3A+An+Updated+Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us+%28Palo+Alto%2C+CA%29&rft.au=Nalini+Neelam&rft.au=Kumar%2C+Amit&rft.au=Sharma%2C+Saumya&rft.au=Singh+Bijeta&rft.date=2022-10-19&rft.pub=Cureus+Inc&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=10&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759%2Fcureus.30457&rft.externalDBID=HAS_PDF_LINK |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2168-8184&client=summon |