What we know and don't know about great ape cultural communication in the wild

Following the first descriptions of culture in primates, widespread agreement has developed that the term can be applied to nonhumans as group‐specific, socially learned behaviors. While behaviors such as those involving extractive tool use have been researched intensively, we propose that behaviors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of primatology p. e23560
Main Authors: Kalan, Ammie K., Nakano, Robyn, Warshawski, Lindsey
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: 12-10-2023
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Following the first descriptions of culture in primates, widespread agreement has developed that the term can be applied to nonhumans as group‐specific, socially learned behaviors. While behaviors such as those involving extractive tool use have been researched intensively, we propose that behaviors that are more subtle, less likely to be ecologically constrained, and more likely to be socially shaped, such as cultural forms of communication, provide compelling evidence of culture in nonhuman primates. Additionally, cultural forms of communication can provide novel insights into animal cognition such as the capacity for conformity, conventionalized meanings, arbitrariness in signal forms, and even symbolism. In this paper we focus on evidence from studies conducted on wild great apes. First, we provide a thorough review of what exactly we do know, and by extension don't know, about great ape cultural communication. We argue that detailed research on both vocal and gestural communication in wild great apes shows a more nuanced and variable repertoire than once assumed, with increasing support for group‐specific variation. Second, we discuss the relevance of great ape cultural communication and its potential for illustrating evolutionary continuity for human‐like cultural attributes, namely cumulative culture and symbolism. In sum, a concerted effort to examine cultural forms of communication in great apes could reveal novel evidence for cultural capacities that have thus far been heavily debated in the literature and can simultaneously contribute to an improved understanding of the complex minds of our closest living relatives. Both vocal and gestural signals in great apes demonstrate some group‐specific variation with compelling evidence for cultural behaviors in the communicative domain. Cultural variation includes presence/absence of signals but also more nuanced variation in signal form or function. More cross‐site comparisons across and within great ape species are necessary to reveal the full extent and richness of cultural communication in our closest living relatives.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0275-2565
1098-2345
DOI:10.1002/ajp.23560