Experimental and CFD simulation study on anaerobic digestion using dextran pharmaceutical wastewater based on cyclic fluidization hydraulic mixing

Pharmaceutical wastewater is a kind of high‐hazardous waste. To realize non‐waste production, experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation were performed to reveal the hydraulic mechanism of mixing modes. Three digesters, numbered 0# (no‐port), 1# (one‐port), and 4# (four‐port), were...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental progress & sustainable energy Vol. 40; no. 5
Main Authors: Xu, Langui, Yang, Luqian, Guo, Shurui, Zhou, Jiawei, Luo, Tao, Ran, Yi, Li, Jiang, Long, Enshen, Mei, Zili, Huang, Ruyi
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: Hoboken, USA John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01-09-2021
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pharmaceutical wastewater is a kind of high‐hazardous waste. To realize non‐waste production, experiment and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation were performed to reveal the hydraulic mechanism of mixing modes. Three digesters, numbered 0# (no‐port), 1# (one‐port), and 4# (four‐port), were conducted by dextran pharmaceutical wastewater. Digester 0# is the control group without mixing. Mixing mode of bottom inlet and high‐position outlet is employed to 1# and 4#, the outlets of 1# and 4# are centralized outlet with only one port and distributed outlets with four ports, respectively. Experiment result shows the daily biogas production of 1# and 4# are 45% and 58% higher than 0#, and the pollutants removal rate increased 20% and 24%, respectively. CFD simulation shows the second phase (dextran wastewater) of 4# failing to form a complete hydraulic path like the first phase (water), which explain the mixing modes can greatly improve the biogas yield, but the four‐port mode has a weaker advantage than the one‐port.
Bibliography:Funding information
Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Grant/Award Number: CAAS‐ASTIP‐2016‐BIOMA; Key R & D Plan of Sichuan Science and Technology Program, Grant/Award Number: 2020YFN0016; National Key Technology Support Program, Grant/Award Number: 2015BAD21B03; National Nature Science Foundation of China, Grant/Award Numbers: 51308361, 51805166; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Grant/Award Number: 2019TQ0084; Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
ISSN:1944-7442
1944-7450
DOI:10.1002/ep.13656