Blockchain-Based Smart Monitoring Framework for Defense Industry
Internet of Things (IoT) technology has been widely adopted across various industries for remote decision-making, monitoring, and surveillance. The proliferation of IoT applications in sensitive sectors, such as national defense and security, has been driven by the ability to obtain in-depth informa...
Saved in:
Published in: | IEEE access Vol. 12; pp. 91316 - 91330 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Piscataway
IEEE
2024
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Internet of Things (IoT) technology has been widely adopted across various industries for remote decision-making, monitoring, and surveillance. The proliferation of IoT applications in sensitive sectors, such as national defense and security, has been driven by the ability to obtain in-depth information on ubiquitous occurrences. Conspicuously, the current research presents a comprehensive framework based on the IoT-empowered Digital Twin technology for assessing the national integrity of defense personnel. The primary objective is to identify the integral behavior of military personnel by securely tracking everyday activities. The proposed method demonstrated the ability to accurately analyze an individual's anomalous occurrences in activities using a hybrid Convolution Neural Network with Gated Recurrent Units. Moreover, each personnel is mapped using a secure blockchain platform for acquiring social interactions and activities to identify potential threats to national security. The proposed model has been validated using challenging date sets obtained from public repositories. The computed results indicate that the proposed solution is successful in facilitating the development of high-quality defense services. The effectiveness of the suggested solution is evaluated using statistical metrics including vulnerable activity recognition (Precision 95.24%), model training and testing (Precision 95.24%, Recall (95.00%), and F-Measure 94.11%), latency rate (7.45 seconds), and data processing cost(<inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">\theta </tex-math></inline-formula>((n-1) logn)). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-3536 2169-3536 |
DOI: | 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3421573 |