Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of medicine and surgery Vol. 86; no. 2; pp. 1003 - 1011
Main Authors: Al-Dardery, Nada M, Khaity, Abdulrhman M, Albakri, Khaled A, Abdelsattar, Ahmed T, Benmelouka, Amira Y, Lee, Theodore, Foppiani, Jose A, Lin, Samuel J
Format: Journal Article
Language:English
Published: England Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 01-02-2024
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Abstract This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4. These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); = 0.83]. This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters.
AbstractList This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4. These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); = 0.83]. This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters.
IntroductionThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery.MethodsThe authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4.ResultsThese results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); P = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); P = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); P = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) P = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); P = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); P = 0.83].ConclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters.
Author Albakri, Khaled A
Benmelouka, Amira Y
Foppiani, Jose A
Al-Dardery, Nada M
Abdelsattar, Ahmed T
Khaity, Abdulrhman M
Lee, Theodore
Lin, Samuel J
AuthorAffiliation d Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria
f 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
c Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
a Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
b Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan
g Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
e Georgetown University, Washington DC
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: e Georgetown University, Washington DC
– name: d Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria
– name: c Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
– name: a Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
– name: b Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan
– name: f 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
– name: g Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Nada M
  surname: Al-Dardery
  fullname: Al-Dardery, Nada M
  organization: Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Abdulrhman M
  surname: Khaity
  fullname: Khaity, Abdulrhman M
  organization: Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Khaled A
  surname: Albakri
  fullname: Albakri, Khaled A
  organization: Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ahmed T
  surname: Abdelsattar
  fullname: Abdelsattar, Ahmed T
  organization: Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Amira Y
  surname: Benmelouka
  fullname: Benmelouka, Amira Y
  organization: Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Theodore
  surname: Lee
  fullname: Lee, Theodore
  organization: Georgetown University, Washington DC
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Jose A
  surname: Foppiani
  fullname: Foppiani, Jose A
  organization: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Samuel J
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Samuel J
  organization: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38333310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNpdUU1v1DAQtVAR_aD_ACEfuaT4I5s4XBCqoCAVtRJwtibOuGuU2MXjLNoj_5ws_dCWucxo5r03o3nH7CCmiIy9kuJMiq59-_Vbdyb2QjZKPWNHStRdJYyQB3v1ITsl-rkDiZVuGvOCHWqjl5DiiP25zkiYN1BCinyDmWbiQyBC96-TPC9r5CEWzC5RSX0Gtw4w8riwkPuUeZ8RqHAH0WHmNOcbzAHpHQdOWyo4LeKOZ9wE_M0hDnzCAhVEGLcU6CV77mEkPL3PJ-zHp4_fzz9Xl1cXX84_XFZOGVMqj82gnHS6aY3pXVervlUKwEsEdEa3YpCu9ag01L4dhkauBKqhUY0XRjZan7D3d7q3cz_h4DCWDKO9zWGCvLUJgn06iWFtb9LGSmHqTq92Cm_uFXL6NSMVOwVyOI4QMc1kVadWYvdXs0DrO6jLiSijf9wjhd05aBcH7f8OLrTX-zc-kh780n8BmdWciA
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024
Copyright_xml – notice: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024
DBID NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622
DatabaseName PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle PubMed
CrossRef
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2049-0801
EndPage 1011
ExternalDocumentID 10_1097_MS9_0000000000001622
38333310
Genre Journal Article
Review
GroupedDBID .1-
.FO
0R~
0SF
1P~
4.4
457
53G
5VS
6I.
AAAAV
AACTN
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAFTH
AAHPQ
AAIKJ
AAIQE
AALRI
AASCR
AAXUO
ABASU
ABDIG
ABMAC
ABVCZ
ACGFS
ACILI
ACXJB
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADGGA
ADHPY
ADPDF
ADRAZ
ADVLN
AEVXI
AEXQZ
AFCTW
AFDTB
AFRHN
AFTJW
AGHFR
AHQNM
AINUH
AITUG
AJNWD
AJUYK
AJZMW
AKRWK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMJPA
AMKUR
AMNEI
AMRAJ
AOHHW
AOIJS
BAWUL
DIK
DIWNM
EBS
EEVPB
EJD
FCALG
FDB
GNXGY
GQDEL
GROUPED_DOAJ
HYE
IKREB
IPNFZ
IXB
KQ8
M41
M48
M~E
NCXOZ
NPM
OK1
OVD
OVDNE
RIG
ROL
RPM
SSZ
TEORI
TSPGW
Z5R
AAYXX
CITATION
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-fe6d2c1c36788bc942b722aaf1eaec8370d1c7fe23a4f7dd6150e2d626f081633
IEDL.DBID RPM
ISSN 2049-0801
IngestDate Tue Sep 17 21:29:57 EDT 2024
Sat Oct 26 00:23:01 EDT 2024
Thu Nov 21 22:03:07 EST 2024
Sat Nov 02 12:19:18 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords preservation
breast cancer
post-mastectomy pain syndrome
intercostobrachial nerve
dissection
Language English
License Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c288t-fe6d2c1c36788bc942b722aaf1eaec8370d1c7fe23a4f7dd6150e2d626f081633
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849353/
PMID 38333310
PQID 2925033318
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10849353
proquest_miscellaneous_2925033318
crossref_primary_10_1097_MS9_0000000000001622
pubmed_primary_38333310
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Hagerstown, MD
PublicationTitle Annals of medicine and surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate Ann Med Surg (Lond)
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Publisher_xml – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
SSID ssj0001053668
Score 2.313355
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast...
IntroductionThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
crossref
pubmed
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 1003
SubjectTerms Reviews
Title Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38333310
https://search.proquest.com/docview/2925033318
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10849353
Volume 86
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9tAEB41HCouqNACAVpNJa4m2UfsNTfEQ7kEVYVKVS_Weh8CiTgojx_Qf86MH4HQW32wLK1tWZ7Rzjc733wLcKq8dE5LkZSl94l2fJVHwZOhMF7r4CM3J4_vstvf5uqaZXLSrhemJu278vGsepqeVY8PNbfyeeoGHU9s8GNyKYZG52qkBj3oETh8k6PXKyvkV2lquj65PBtM7vJGp7A9RCrlZhz6B1y-50i-CTo3n2CnRYt40XzVLnwI1R58nLT18M_wlxkU3bIqMsNitcC6xF63K-AsIgE8ZE2IuWMJDcqNmdz8hBUzHZEQK5ZMS1-iY_PPcVG3SVP6fI4WX2WesWlxQVt5nIalTWwrZvIFft1c31-Ok3ZThcRJY5ZJDCmZRzhFUcqULteyzKS0Nopgg2MpHC9cFoNUVsfMexaMD9JT3hN5jw6l9mGrmlXhEDBTIVK2NAp2qLUzZTlSVmQuxjwnECbSPiTdLy6eG-2Moqt5k0mK9ybpw_fODgU5OVcubBVmq0Uhc8nlVpp_-nDQ2GX9RkqxeWTYB7NhsfUNLKC9OUJ-VQtpd3509P-PHsO2JJjT8LhPYGs5X4Wv0Fv41bfaK-n8Z_TzBebq7OM
link.rule.ids 230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,53800,53802
linkProvider National Library of Medicine
linkToHtml http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTtxAEC0FIpFckhCSMNmoSLmacS9jt3OLCGiiMAgJkHKz2r0oSIwHzfIB_HmqvAADN3yy1LZl6VV3VXW9eg3wXXnpnJYiqSrvE-34roiCF0NhvNbBR25OHp_lJ3_Nr0OWycn6XpiGtO-qy_36arpfX_5ruJXXUzfseWLD08mBSI0u1EgNN-A5Tdg0vZelN3srZFlZZvpOuSIfTs6KVqmwu0Qm5bonehRePmRJ3nM7R6-f-sNv4FUXaOLPdnwbnoX6LWxNulL6Dtww-aLfkUUmZ6wW2FTnm04HnEWk2BBZTmLuWH2D0mrmRV9hzSRJpGAXK2a0L9Gx5cxx0XRYU-b9Ay3eKURj2x2DtvY4DUub2E4H5R1cHB2eH4yT7jyGxEljlkkMGSErnCIHZypXaFnlUlobRbDBsYqOFy6PQSqrY-49a80H6Slliny8h1LvYbOe1WEXMFchUqI1CjbV2pmqGikrchdjUVD8JrIBJD025XUru1H25XLCsnyI5QC-9QCWND-46GHrMFstSllIrtTS0jWADy2gt1-k7JxH0gGYNahvH2Dt7fURQrjR4O4R_fj0V_fgxfh8clwe_z758wleSoqWWjr4Z9hczlfhC2ws_OprY9r_AdmhAao
linkToPdf http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ZT9wwEB4VKqG-lJ6w0GMq9TVkfWzi8FYBK6p2ERKt1LfI8SGQ2Oxqjx_Qf85MDsrStzZPkWxHkb6xPeP55jPAZ-Wlc1qKpKq8T7TjtyIKXgyF8VoHH7k4-fwqv_hlTs9YJue4r4VpSPuuujmqb6dH9c11w62cT13a88TSy8mJGBpdqJFK5z6mW_CUJu1QPojUm_MVsq4sM321XJGnk6uiVSvsHpFJubkb_eViPmZKPth6xrv_89Mv4HnncOKXts9LeBLqV7Az6VLqr-E3kzD6k1lkksZ6iU2Wvql4wFlE8hGRZSUWjlU4KLxmfvQt1kyWRHJ6sWJm-wodW9ACl02lNUXgx2jxj1I0tlUyaGuP07Cyie30UN7Az_HZj5PzpLuXIXHSmFUSQ0YIC6doozOVK7SscimtjSLY4FhNxwuXxyCV1TH3njXng_QUOkW-5kOpt7Bdz-qwD5irECngGgU71NqZqhopK3IXY1GQHyeyASQ9PuW8ld8o-7Q54Vk-xnMAn3oQS5onnPywdZitl6UsJGdsaQkbwF4L6v0XKUrnluEAzAbc9x1Yg3uzhVButLh7VA_-fehH2Lk8HZffv158O4RnkpymlhX-DrZXi3V4D1tLv_7QWPcd5R0EKg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preservation+versus+dissection+of+the+intercostobrachial+nerve+for+breast+cancer+surgeries%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+medicine+and+surgery&rft.au=Al-Dardery%2C+Nada+M&rft.au=Khaity%2C+Abdulrhman+M&rft.au=Albakri%2C+Khaled+A&rft.au=Abdelsattar%2C+Ahmed+T&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.issn=2049-0801&rft.eissn=2049-0801&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1003&rft.epage=1011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMS9.0000000000001622&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon