Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery. The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened fo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of medicine and surgery Vol. 86; no. 2; pp. 1003 - 1011 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Journal Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
England
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
01-02-2024
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Abstract | This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery.
The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4.
These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82);
= 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68);
= 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15);
= 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61)
= 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60);
= 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69);
= 0.83].
This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery.
The authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4.
These results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82);
= 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68);
= 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15);
= 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61)
= 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60);
= 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69);
= 0.83].
This meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters. IntroductionThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast surgery.MethodsThe authors searched Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus from inception until March 2023. Records were screened for eligible studies, and all relevant outcomes were pooled as an odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI in the meta-analysis models using RevMan version 5.4.ResultsThese results from 11 studies (1021 patients) favored preservation of the ICBN over its dissection in terms of anaesthesia and hypaesthesia [OR 0.50, (95% CI, 0.31-0.82); P = 0.006] and [OR 0.33, (95% CI, 0.16-0.68); P = 0.003], respectively. Whereas the overall effect favored ICBN dissection over preservation in the case of hyperaesthesia [OR 4.34, (95% CI, 1.43-13.15); P = 0.01]. Conversely, no significant variance was detected between the two groups in terms of pain [OR 0.68, (95% CI, 0.28-1.61) P = 0.38], paraesthesia [OR 0.88, (95% CI, 0.49-1.60); P = 0.68], and analgesia [OR 1.46, (95% CI, 0.05-45.69); P = 0.83].ConclusionThis meta-analysis revealed that the preservation of the ICBN has a significant effect on the disturbance of sensory parameters of hypaesthesia and anaesthesia when compared to its dissection. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to precisely compare both techniques on a wider range of parameters. |
Author | Albakri, Khaled A Benmelouka, Amira Y Foppiani, Jose A Al-Dardery, Nada M Abdelsattar, Ahmed T Khaity, Abdulrhman M Lee, Theodore Lin, Samuel J |
AuthorAffiliation | d Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria f 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic c Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan a Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt b Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan g Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA e Georgetown University, Washington DC |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: e Georgetown University, Washington DC – name: d Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria – name: c Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan – name: a Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt – name: b Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan – name: f 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic – name: g Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nada M surname: Al-Dardery fullname: Al-Dardery, Nada M organization: Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt – sequence: 2 givenname: Abdulrhman M surname: Khaity fullname: Khaity, Abdulrhman M organization: Faculty of Medicine, Elrazi University, Khartoum, Sudan – sequence: 3 givenname: Khaled A surname: Albakri fullname: Albakri, Khaled A organization: Faculty of Medicine, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan – sequence: 4 givenname: Ahmed T surname: Abdelsattar fullname: Abdelsattar, Ahmed T organization: Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt – sequence: 5 givenname: Amira Y surname: Benmelouka fullname: Benmelouka, Amira Y organization: Faculty of Medicine, University of Algiers, Algiers, Algeria – sequence: 6 givenname: Theodore surname: Lee fullname: Lee, Theodore organization: Georgetown University, Washington DC – sequence: 7 givenname: Jose A surname: Foppiani fullname: Foppiani, Jose A organization: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA – sequence: 8 givenname: Samuel J surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Samuel J organization: Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38333310$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNpdUU1v1DAQtVAR_aD_ACEfuaT4I5s4XBCqoCAVtRJwtibOuGuU2MXjLNoj_5ws_dCWucxo5r03o3nH7CCmiIy9kuJMiq59-_Vbdyb2QjZKPWNHStRdJYyQB3v1ITsl-rkDiZVuGvOCHWqjl5DiiP25zkiYN1BCinyDmWbiQyBC96-TPC9r5CEWzC5RSX0Gtw4w8riwkPuUeZ8RqHAH0WHmNOcbzAHpHQdOWyo4LeKOZ9wE_M0hDnzCAhVEGLcU6CV77mEkPL3PJ-zHp4_fzz9Xl1cXX84_XFZOGVMqj82gnHS6aY3pXVervlUKwEsEdEa3YpCu9ag01L4dhkauBKqhUY0XRjZan7D3d7q3cz_h4DCWDKO9zWGCvLUJgn06iWFtb9LGSmHqTq92Cm_uFXL6NSMVOwVyOI4QMc1kVadWYvdXs0DrO6jLiSijf9wjhd05aBcH7f8OLrTX-zc-kh780n8BmdWciA |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. 2024 |
DBID | NPM AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001622 |
DatabaseName | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | PubMed CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2049-0801 |
EndPage | 1011 |
ExternalDocumentID | 10_1097_MS9_0000000000001622 38333310 |
Genre | Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | .1- .FO 0R~ 0SF 1P~ 4.4 457 53G 5VS 6I. AAAAV AACTN AAEDT AAEDW AAFTH AAHPQ AAIKJ AAIQE AALRI AASCR AAXUO ABASU ABDIG ABMAC ABVCZ ACGFS ACILI ACXJB ADBBV ADEZE ADGGA ADHPY ADPDF ADRAZ ADVLN AEVXI AEXQZ AFCTW AFDTB AFRHN AFTJW AGHFR AHQNM AINUH AITUG AJNWD AJUYK AJZMW AKRWK ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI AMRAJ AOHHW AOIJS BAWUL DIK DIWNM EBS EEVPB EJD FCALG FDB GNXGY GQDEL GROUPED_DOAJ HYE IKREB IPNFZ IXB KQ8 M41 M48 M~E NCXOZ NPM OK1 OVD OVDNE RIG ROL RPM SSZ TEORI TSPGW Z5R AAYXX CITATION 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-fe6d2c1c36788bc942b722aaf1eaec8370d1c7fe23a4f7dd6150e2d626f081633 |
IEDL.DBID | RPM |
ISSN | 2049-0801 |
IngestDate | Tue Sep 17 21:29:57 EDT 2024 Sat Oct 26 00:23:01 EDT 2024 Thu Nov 21 22:03:07 EST 2024 Sat Nov 02 12:19:18 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | preservation breast cancer post-mastectomy pain syndrome intercostobrachial nerve dissection |
Language | English |
License | Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c288t-fe6d2c1c36788bc942b722aaf1eaec8370d1c7fe23a4f7dd6150e2d626f081633 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10849353/ |
PMID | 38333310 |
PQID | 2925033318 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10849353 proquest_miscellaneous_2925033318 crossref_primary_10_1097_MS9_0000000000001622 pubmed_primary_38333310 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2024 text: 2024-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: Hagerstown, MD |
PublicationTitle | Annals of medicine and surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Ann Med Surg (Lond) |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
Publisher_xml | – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
SSID | ssj0001053668 |
Score | 2.313355 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who underwent breast... IntroductionThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of preservation of the intercostobrachial nerve (ICBN) versus its dissection for patients who... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest crossref pubmed |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 1003 |
SubjectTerms | Reviews |
Title | Preservation versus dissection of the intercostobrachial nerve for breast cancer surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38333310 https://search.proquest.com/docview/2925033318 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10849353 |
Volume | 86 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LT9tAEB41HCouqNACAVpNJa4m2UfsNTfEQ7kEVYVKVS_Weh8CiTgojx_Qf86MH4HQW32wLK1tWZ7Rzjc733wLcKq8dE5LkZSl94l2fJVHwZOhMF7r4CM3J4_vstvf5uqaZXLSrhemJu278vGsepqeVY8PNbfyeeoGHU9s8GNyKYZG52qkBj3oETh8k6PXKyvkV2lquj65PBtM7vJGp7A9RCrlZhz6B1y-50i-CTo3n2CnRYt40XzVLnwI1R58nLT18M_wlxkU3bIqMsNitcC6xF63K-AsIgE8ZE2IuWMJDcqNmdz8hBUzHZEQK5ZMS1-iY_PPcVG3SVP6fI4WX2WesWlxQVt5nIalTWwrZvIFft1c31-Ok3ZThcRJY5ZJDCmZRzhFUcqULteyzKS0Nopgg2MpHC9cFoNUVsfMexaMD9JT3hN5jw6l9mGrmlXhEDBTIVK2NAp2qLUzZTlSVmQuxjwnECbSPiTdLy6eG-2Moqt5k0mK9ybpw_fODgU5OVcubBVmq0Uhc8nlVpp_-nDQ2GX9RkqxeWTYB7NhsfUNLKC9OUJ-VQtpd3509P-PHsO2JJjT8LhPYGs5X4Wv0Fv41bfaK-n8Z_TzBebq7OM |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,729,782,786,887,27933,27934,53800,53802 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
linkToHtml | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3JTtxAEC0FIpFckhCSMNmoSLmacS9jt3OLCGiiMAgJkHKz2r0oSIwHzfIB_HmqvAADN3yy1LZl6VV3VXW9eg3wXXnpnJYiqSrvE-34roiCF0NhvNbBR25OHp_lJ3_Nr0OWycn6XpiGtO-qy_36arpfX_5ruJXXUzfseWLD08mBSI0u1EgNN-A5Tdg0vZelN3srZFlZZvpOuSIfTs6KVqmwu0Qm5bonehRePmRJ3nM7R6-f-sNv4FUXaOLPdnwbnoX6LWxNulL6Dtww-aLfkUUmZ6wW2FTnm04HnEWk2BBZTmLuWH2D0mrmRV9hzSRJpGAXK2a0L9Gx5cxx0XRYU-b9Ay3eKURj2x2DtvY4DUub2E4H5R1cHB2eH4yT7jyGxEljlkkMGSErnCIHZypXaFnlUlobRbDBsYqOFy6PQSqrY-49a80H6Slliny8h1LvYbOe1WEXMFchUqI1CjbV2pmqGikrchdjUVD8JrIBJD025XUru1H25XLCsnyI5QC-9QCWND-46GHrMFstSllIrtTS0jWADy2gt1-k7JxH0gGYNahvH2Dt7fURQrjR4O4R_fj0V_fgxfh8clwe_z758wleSoqWWjr4Z9hczlfhC2ws_OprY9r_AdmhAao |
linkToPdf | http://sdu.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1ZT9wwEB4VKqG-lJ6w0GMq9TVkfWzi8FYBK6p2ERKt1LfI8SGQ2Oxqjx_Qf85MDsrStzZPkWxHkb6xPeP55jPAZ-Wlc1qKpKq8T7TjtyIKXgyF8VoHH7k4-fwqv_hlTs9YJue4r4VpSPuuujmqb6dH9c11w62cT13a88TSy8mJGBpdqJFK5z6mW_CUJu1QPojUm_MVsq4sM321XJGnk6uiVSvsHpFJubkb_eViPmZKPth6xrv_89Mv4HnncOKXts9LeBLqV7Az6VLqr-E3kzD6k1lkksZ6iU2Wvql4wFlE8hGRZSUWjlU4KLxmfvQt1kyWRHJ6sWJm-wodW9ACl02lNUXgx2jxj1I0tlUyaGuP07Cyie30UN7Az_HZj5PzpLuXIXHSmFUSQ0YIC6doozOVK7SscimtjSLY4FhNxwuXxyCV1TH3njXng_QUOkW-5kOpt7Bdz-qwD5irECngGgU71NqZqhopK3IXY1GQHyeyASQ9PuW8ld8o-7Q54Vk-xnMAn3oQS5onnPywdZitl6UsJGdsaQkbwF4L6v0XKUrnluEAzAbc9x1Yg3uzhVButLh7VA_-fehH2Lk8HZffv158O4RnkpymlhX-DrZXi3V4D1tLv_7QWPcd5R0EKg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preservation+versus+dissection+of+the+intercostobrachial+nerve+for+breast+cancer+surgeries%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+medicine+and+surgery&rft.au=Al-Dardery%2C+Nada+M&rft.au=Khaity%2C+Abdulrhman+M&rft.au=Albakri%2C+Khaled+A&rft.au=Abdelsattar%2C+Ahmed+T&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.issn=2049-0801&rft.eissn=2049-0801&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1003&rft.epage=1011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097%2FMS9.0000000000001622&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2049-0801&client=summon |